Oh, I wasn't saying it was a good thing, my little nutbag. I was saying that if all you wingnuts have is this, you really don't have much of anything. Definitely not enough to warrant the amount of time that was put into it.
Pretty pathetic after all these years, really, dontcha think?
Lying is enough, you stupid shit!
You're only saying that because of who you perceive as lying.
No moron, 4 people died, she lied about it. She is a person who was given a position of trust and authority. To you left wing nutjobs, lying is almost a pre-requisite to success, but you people are fucked in the head. She lied and needs to be held accountable for it.
Well, you know, I did a little digging and...
Oct. 15: Clinton, in an
interview on CNN, blamed the “fog of war” when asked why the administration initially claimed the attack began with the anti-Muslim video, even though the State Department never reached that conclusion. “In the wake of an attack like this in the fog of war, there’s always going to be confusion, and I think it is absolutely fair to say that everyone had the same intelligence,” Clinton said. “Everyone who spoke tried to give the information they had. As time has gone on, the information has changed, we’ve gotten more detail, but that’s not surprising. That always happens.”
Benghazi Timeline
There's a lot more than just that one paragraph, but basically she explained herself early on and it was obviously not enough. Why would it be, after all?
But I'll reiterate: this kind of thing really is small potatoes. When you get right down to it, you wingnuts really don't have shit if this is all you're gonna hang on her, especially considering all the other crap assholes like you tried to tar her and the President with that got debunked.