Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 102,604
- 84,061
- 3,645
What "dangerous clauses"? And, even if you produce them, you have only made an argument for getting rid of those clauses, not for scrapping net neutrality altogether. So you're not making a good argument, which itself is compounded by your inability to specifically name the dangers, and instead defering to appeal to emotion./----/ "My God, you preposterous rubes. Did you really think Obama’s agents in the FCC were going to apply a “light touch” to anything? Did you seriously believe they’d pass up on the opportunity to insert toxic clauses that would give them open-ended power to regulate content later, once it’s too late for you deluded activists to do anything about it? How can you possibly think the prospective expense of this scheme would deter them in the least?What in the world are you babbling about? How did net neutrality make the internet worse for you?/----/ The Internet was great the first 15 years until the Gubmint wanted to stick their greedy little power hungry paws into it. President Trump rolled it back. Deal with it. Besides, I recall when Liberals were champions of freedom of choice and no Government interference.This is a perfect example of a grown man willing to make himself seem like a retarded idiot, just to protect his little Trumpie. As if Obama inserted concepts like "science-based" and "evidence-based" into the work of scientists. Damn this is embarrassing. And we have about 20 million of these fools in this country. And their endless squawking makes it seem like 2 billion.he is UNcontrolling the control invoked by Obama who put all that horseshit in there in the first place!
Excuse you brownshirt, "dealing with it" in a civilized, western country means speaking out and voting against it. It appears it is you who is the sensitive one.
Net neutrality is not a liberal/conservative issue. You are just knee-jerking on a topic you know nothing about. When did "conservative" get redefined to mean, "just take the opposite position of anything a liberal says"? How mindless.
“It is likely that only companies that can afford years of litigation to answer these questions will be able to rely on the rule at all… A multi-factor test gives the FCC an awful lot of discretion, potentially giving an unfair advantage to parties with insider influence…” Yes, children, that’s the point. That’s a feature, not a bug. That’s the reason statists are so interested in Net Neutrality.
They’ll use that discretion to impose super-heavy burdens on political adversaries, but they’ll be dumping plenty of cost burdens on everyone… and then they’ll blame what remains of the free market for those costs… and present an even more onerous set of New Deal regulations to an anguished public as the only solution." --- John Haywood
'Net Neutrality' Is a Problem, Not a Solution - Breitbart