7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world

[Faun]

Stupid enough to figure you out? Well who is the dumb one now?

You are. You idiotically think Democrats took over Congress in 2006. Goes a long way in explaining why you also b'lieve Obama funded a group to influence a non-existent election.

Well who took over Congress in 2006 the gray Martians that Neil Armstrong and edgar mitchel kept claiming were on the moon?

Neither party took over in 2006, forum jester

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

 

[Wyatt earp]

You are. You idiotically think Democrats took over Congress in 2006. Goes a long way in explaining why you also b'lieve Obama funded a group to influence a non-existent election.

Well who took over Congress in 2006 the gray Martians that Neil Armstrong and edgar mitchel kept claiming were on the moon?

Neither party took over in 2006, forum jester

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

You should change your name to Jan on the Brady bunch, always blowing up my alerts with stupid drama stuff...


OK Jan, what bullshit you going to tell us now? Tippy wasn't speaker of the house in 1982?




.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Well who took over Congress in 2006 the gray Martians that Neil Armstrong and edgar mitchel kept claiming were on the moon?

Neither party took over in 2006, forum jester

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

You should change your name to Jan on the Brady bunch, always blowing up my alerts with stupid drama stuff...


OK Jan, what bullshit you going to tell us now? Tippy wasn't speaker of the house in 1982?




.

.


Or are you going to tell us Bill Clinton was never impeached? What asinine story you going to post now Jan Brady (faun). ?


.

 

[Faun]

Well who took over Congress in 2006 the gray Martians that Neil Armstrong and edgar mitchel kept claiming were on the moon?

Neither party took over in 2006, forum jester

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

You should change your name to Jan on the Brady bunch, always blowing up my alerts with stupid drama stuff...


OK Jan, what bullshit you going to tell us now? Tippy wasn't speaker of the house in 1982?




.

Why are you blaming me because you're too stupid to know how to reply to post?

 

[Faun]

Neither party took over in 2006, forum jester

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

You should change your name to Jan on the Brady bunch, always blowing up my alerts with stupid drama stuff...


OK Jan, what bullshit you going to tell us now? Tippy wasn't speaker of the house in 1982?




.

.


Or are you going to tell us Bill Clinton was never impeached? What asinine story you going to post now Jan Brady (faun). ?


.

You should answer your own question since you're asking yourself.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Neither party took over in 2006, forum jester

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

You should change your name to Jan on the Brady bunch, always blowing up my alerts with stupid drama stuff...


OK Jan, what bullshit you going to tell us now? Tippy wasn't speaker of the house in 1982?




.

Why are you blaming me because you're too stupid to know how to reply to post?

Neither party took over in 2006, forum jester

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

You should change your name to Jan on the Brady bunch, always blowing up my alerts with stupid drama stuff...


OK Jan, what bullshit you going to tell us now? Tippy wasn't speaker of the house in 1982?




.

Why are you blaming me because you're too stupid to know how to reply to post?

^^^

 

[Wyatt earp]

You are. You idiotically think Democrats took over Congress in 2006. Goes a long way in explaining why you also b'lieve Obama funded a group to influence a non-existent election.

Well who took over Congress in 2006 the gray Martians that Neil Armstrong and edgar mitchel kept claiming were on the moon?

Neither party took over in 2006, forum jester

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

I am not the one always throwing a tantrum around here..or make up shit...


So once again ( I will be nice) your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?



.

 

[danielpalos]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Another cut and paste by a genius who doesn't know the def of liberal.
No Latin in college or no college period?

I am practicing on, "color by numbers" simplicity, specifically for the right wing.

“As Mankind becomes more liberal, they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protections of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations of justice and liberality.”

― George Washington

 

[Faun]

Well who took over Congress in 2006 the gray Martians that Neil Armstrong and edgar mitchel kept claiming were on the moon?

Neither party took over in 2006, forum jester

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

I am not the one always throwing a tantrum around here..or make up shit...


So once again ( I will be nice) your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?



.

Now you're changing what you said. I can only take that to mean even you realize what you said before was completely retarded.

Earlier, you asked, "Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?"

But now you ask, "your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?"

"Taking over" the Congress does not occur at the same time they "win" the election.

It's amazing how stupid you are.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Another cut and paste by a genius who doesn't know the def of liberal.
No Latin in college or no college period?

I am practicing on, "color by numbers" simplicity, specifically for the right wing.

“As Mankind becomes more liberal, they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protections of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations of justice and liberality.”

― George Washington

What you think I don't have Google? Did you happen to take it out of context and leave out a part snowflake?


Letter from George Washington to the Roman Catholics in the United States


As mankind become more liberal they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protection of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations in examples of justice and liberality. And I presume that your fellow-citizens will not forget the patriotic part which you took in the accomplishment of their Revolution, and the establishment of their government; or the important assistance which they received from a nation in which the Roman Catholic faith is professed. ~ George Washington



.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Another cut and paste by a genius who doesn't know the def of liberal.
No Latin in college or no college period?

I am practicing on, "color by numbers" simplicity, specifically for the right wing.

“As Mankind becomes more liberal, they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protections of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations of justice and liberality.”

― George Washington

What you think I don't have Google? Did you happen to take it out of context and leave out a part snowflake?


Letter from George Washington to the Roman Catholics in the United States


As mankind become more liberal they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protection of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations in examples of justice and liberality. And I presume that your fellow-citizens will not forget the patriotic part which you took in the accomplishment of their Revolution, and the establishment of their government; or the important assistance which they received from a nation in which the Roman Catholic faith is professed. ~ George Washington



.

Idiot, don't try me

.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Neither party took over in 2006, forum jester

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

I am not the one always throwing a tantrum around here..or make up shit...


So once again ( I will be nice) your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?



.

Now you're changing what you said. I can only take that to mean even you realize what you said before was completely retarded.

Earlier, you asked, "Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?"

But now you ask, "your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?"

"Taking over" the Congress does not occur at the same time they "win" the election.

It's amazing how stupid you are.

Now that's your retort temper tantrum Jan Brady .? To analyze my spelling and grammar?


Jesus you are a god damn funny clown,.



Cookie..

 

[danielpalos]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Another cut and paste by a genius who doesn't know the def of liberal.
No Latin in college or no college period?

I am practicing on, "color by numbers" simplicity, specifically for the right wing.

“As Mankind becomes more liberal, they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protections of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations of justice and liberality.”

― George Washington

What you think I don't have Google? Did you happen to take it out of context and leave out a part snowflake?


Letter from George Washington to the Roman Catholics in the United States


As mankind become more liberal they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protection of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations in examples of justice and liberality. And I presume that your fellow-citizens will not forget the patriotic part which you took in the accomplishment of their Revolution, and the establishment of their government; or the important assistance which they received from a nation in which the Roman Catholic faith is professed. ~ George Washington



.

It has more to do with, "natural rights".

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Another cut and paste by a genius who doesn't know the def of liberal.
No Latin in college or no college period?

I am practicing on, "color by numbers" simplicity, specifically for the right wing.

“As Mankind becomes more liberal, they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protections of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations of justice and liberality.”

― George Washington

What you think I don't have Google? Did you happen to take it out of context and leave out a part snowflake?


Letter from George Washington to the Roman Catholics in the United States


As mankind become more liberal they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protection of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations in examples of justice and liberality. And I presume that your fellow-citizens will not forget the patriotic part which you took in the accomplishment of their Revolution, and the establishment of their government; or the important assistance which they received from a nation in which the Roman Catholic faith is professed. ~ George Washington



.

It has more to do with, "natural rights".

Lmfao idiot you just confirmed we are a Christian nation..


.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Neither party took over in 2006, forum jester

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

I am not the one always throwing a tantrum around here..or make up shit...


So once again ( I will be nice) your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?



.

Now you're changing what you said. I can only take that to mean even you realize what you said before was completely retarded.

Earlier, you asked, "Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?"

But now you ask, "your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?"

"Taking over" the Congress does not occur at the same time they "win" the election.

It's amazing how stupid you are.

29 stars now for my OP....


Got anything else you want to throw at me faun? I am the road runner and you are Wiley E. Coyote ....beep beep

.

 

[danielpalos]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Another cut and paste by a genius who doesn't know the def of liberal.
No Latin in college or no college period?

I am practicing on, "color by numbers" simplicity, specifically for the right wing.

“As Mankind becomes more liberal, they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protections of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations of justice and liberality.”

― George Washington

What you think I don't have Google? Did you happen to take it out of context and leave out a part snowflake?


Letter from George Washington to the Roman Catholics in the United States


As mankind become more liberal they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protection of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations in examples of justice and liberality. And I presume that your fellow-citizens will not forget the patriotic part which you took in the accomplishment of their Revolution, and the establishment of their government; or the important assistance which they received from a nation in which the Roman Catholic faith is professed. ~ George Washington



.

It has more to do with, "natural rights".

Lmfao idiot you just confirmed we are a Christian nation..


.

it has to do with "foreign nationals in the US".

 

[Faun]

What you think I don't have Google? Did you happen to take it out of context and leave out a part snowflake?


Letter from George Washington to the Roman Catholics in the United States


As mankind become more liberal they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protection of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations in examples of justice and liberality. And I presume that your fellow-citizens will not forget the patriotic part which you took in the accomplishment of their Revolution, and the establishment of their government; or the important assistance which they received from a nation in which the Roman Catholic faith is professed. ~ George Washington



.

Idiot.....

.

Hey, we agree on something. How 'bout that?

 

[Faun]

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

I am not the one always throwing a tantrum around here..or make up shit...


So once again ( I will be nice) your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?



.

Now you're changing what you said. I can only take that to mean even you realize what you said before was completely retarded.

Earlier, you asked, "Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?"

But now you ask, "your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?"

"Taking over" the Congress does not occur at the same time they "win" the election.

It's amazing how stupid you are.

29 stars now for my OP....


Got anything else you want to throw at me faun? I am the road runner and you are Wiley E. Coyote ....beep beep




View attachment 128677



.

Well you do have the mentality of a 4 year old, so yeah, cartoons are about your speed.

 

[Faun]

So you back taking a poop and want to throw another tantrum?

So in your alternative reality ... Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?..
.

Do you even know what day it is? Who even allows you to go online?

So once again in your scary world the Democrats didn't win the house and Senate in 2006?


.

Why are you insulting yourself again? Too stupid to figure out the quote thing, huh?

I am not the one always throwing a tantrum around here..or make up shit...


So once again ( I will be nice) your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?



.

Now you're changing what you said. I can only take that to mean even you realize what you said before was completely retarded.

Earlier, you asked, "Harry Reid didn't take over the Senate and Nancy didn't take over the house cream puff?"

But now you ask, "your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?"

"Taking over" the Congress does not occur at the same time they "win" the election.

It's amazing how stupid you are.

Now that's your retort temper tantrum Jan Brady .? To analyze my spelling and grammar?


Jesus you are a god damn funny clown,.



Cookie..


View attachment 128673

You're truly fucking retarded. Nowhere in that post did I say anything about your spelling or grammar. And I could have had I wanted to.

 

[edthecynic]

So once again ( I will be nice) your going to tell us Nancy didn't win speaker of the house and Harry didn't win control of the Senate in 2006?

Pelosi was elected Speaker of the House on Jan 3, 2007 and her term as Speaker began Jan 4, 2007.