6 New Gun Control Laws Pass in California

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

New California Law Lowers the Bar for Gun Seizures
Legislation allows temporary confiscation of guns from people considered a danger to themselves or others

"""....

California, which already has some of the toughest gun restrictions in the nation, this week moved forward with a sweeping new package of gun control laws that underscores the power of the Democratically controlled state to carve its own path on the issue. On Friday, Gov. Jerry Brown signed six gun-control bills into law, including an expansion of the 1989 law known as the assault weapons ban.

Under the confiscation law, which went into effect in January, California residents can lose their weapons without being convicted of a crime, or being institutionalized. Police or immediate family members must persuade a judge to sign off on what is called a gun violence restraining order, which lasts up to 21 days, but can be extended. (O/P's note: Fantastic!)

The law has so far been used to seize guns in 33 cases, in some instances from mentally unstable people who had made threats or were suicidal, according to data through mid-June provided to The Wall Street Journal by the California attorney general and law-enforcement agencies."""

New California Law Lowers the Bar for Gun Seizures

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Hopefully, this will be another instance of that phenomenon of California being a trendsetter for the rest of the country. Stuff that starts in CA usually moves east.

These new laws will not forbid individuals from forming a well-regulated militia, as stated in the 2nd Amendment.

 

[Iceweasel]

Hopefully, this will be another instance of that phenomenon of California being a trendsetter for the rest of the country. Stuff that starts in CA usually moves east.

These new laws will not forbid individuals from forming a well-regulated militia, as stated in the 2nd Amendment.

The second amendment isn't just about militias. Chanting your retarded world view over and over doesn't bring it any closer to reality, it just proves you are an idiot.

Taking guns from someone said to be suicidal is an over react by the nanny state. Sane people need to leave California like I did back in the 80s, it is circling the drain.

 

[jasonnfree]

The road to total gun control, one step at a time. Guaranteed that people with a poor credit rating will be in the gun grabbers sights one day. Irresponsible with your finances, then you're probably going to be irresponsible with your firearms. Maybe first they'll go after people with bad driving records.

 

[Auld Phart]

"Lowers the Bar"

Excellent way to put it

 

[Freewill]

Hopefully, this will be another instance of that phenomenon of California being a trendsetter for the rest of the country. Stuff that starts in CA usually moves east.

These new laws will not forbid individuals from forming a well-regulated militia, as stated in the 2nd Amendment.

The second amendment says nothing about the right to form a well regulated militia. It does says that it is a right for the PEOPLE to bare arms.

 

[Freewill]

What will the new laws do about situations like this?

Kathryn Steinle family files claims against San Francisco over her death by illegal immigrant

 

[gipper]

Hopefully, this will be another instance of that phenomenon of California being a trendsetter for the rest of the country. Stuff that starts in CA usually moves east.

These new laws will not forbid individuals from forming a well-regulated militia, as stated in the 2nd Amendment.

The second amendment isn't just about militias. Chanting your retarded world view over and over doesn't bring it any closer to reality, it just proves you are an idiot.

Taking guns from someone said to be suicidal is an over react by the nanny state. Sane people need to leave California like I did back in the 80s, it is circling the drain.

Liberal Think:

- A woman should have the unlimited right to decide whether her unborn child lives or dies.

- American citizens should NOT have the unlimited right to protect themselves, so they should not be allowed to possess guns.
(exceptions for the elites and military...and of course criminals, but liberals are not aware that criminals don't abide by the law)

 

[Katzndogz]

These laws will not withstand a constitutional challenge.

 

[Freewill]

Hopefully, this will be another instance of that phenomenon of California being a trendsetter for the rest of the country. Stuff that starts in CA usually moves east.

These new laws will not forbid individuals from forming a well-regulated militia, as stated in the 2nd Amendment.

The second amendment isn't just about militias. Chanting your retarded world view over and over doesn't bring it any closer to reality, it just proves you are an idiot.

Taking guns from someone said to be suicidal is an over react by the nanny state. Sane people need to leave California like I did back in the 80s, it is circling the drain.

Liberal Think:

- A woman should have the unlimited right to decide whether her unborn child lives or dies.

- American citizens should have the unlimited right to protect themselves, so they should not be allowed to possess guns.
(exceptions for the elites and military...and of course criminals, but liberals are not aware that criminals don't abide by the law)

As representative of the liberal left Mrs. Tuzla Clinton said that the unborn child, at anytime, has no constitutional right to life.

But the whole of the liberal thought is that they know how to take care of people best. Give them 90 percent of your hard earned and they will show you life like you could never imagine. They want to take care of you yet the unborn child can be killed, makes no sense but neither does Mrs. Tuzla and liberalism.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The road to total gun control, one step at a time. Guaranteed that people with a poor credit rating will be in the gun grabbers sights one day. Irresponsible with your finances, then you're probably going to be irresponsible with your firearms. Maybe first they'll go after people with bad driving records.

The Slippery Slope is a fallacy in which a person asserts that some event must inevitably follow from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question

 

[jknowgood]

Let me know how the new laws keep another mass murder not to happen.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Hopefully, this will be another instance of that phenomenon of California being a trendsetter for the rest of the country. Stuff that starts in CA usually moves east.

These new laws will not forbid individuals from forming a well-regulated militia, as stated in the 2nd Amendment.

The second amendment says nothing about the right to form a well regulated militia. It does says that it is a right for the PEOPLE to bare arms.

Wrong, Scalia said this in Heller, he also stated the 2nd A. was not an absolute right. Lies by omission are still lies, but you know this! And that makes you a liar.

The 2nd A. wording has been parsed over and over, it what you posted was true, the 2nd would not have included the first two phrases: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State"

Please explain why these two phrases were included, if the original intent was solely: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Let me know how the new laws keep another mass murder not to happen.

another Idiot-gram ^^^ from the crazy right wing.

 

[Auld Phart]

Hopefully, this will be another instance of that phenomenon of California being a trendsetter for the rest of the country. Stuff that starts in CA usually moves east.

These new laws will not forbid individuals from forming a well-regulated militia, as stated in the 2nd Amendment.

The second amendment says nothing about the right to form a well regulated militia. It does says that it is a right for the PEOPLE to bare arms.

Wrong, Scalia said this in Heller, he also stated the 2nd A. was not an absolute right. Lies by omission are still lies, but you know this! And that makes you a liar.

The 2nd A. wording has been parsed over and over, it what you posted was true, the 2nd would not have included the first two phrases: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State"

Please explain why these two phrases were included, if the original intent was solely: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"?

Please explain why these two phrases were included, if the original intent was solely: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"?

Militias were made up from the people, but not all people were eligible to join the militia.

 

[Freewill]

Hopefully, this will be another instance of that phenomenon of California being a trendsetter for the rest of the country. Stuff that starts in CA usually moves east.

These new laws will not forbid individuals from forming a well-regulated militia, as stated in the 2nd Amendment.

The second amendment says nothing about the right to form a well regulated militia. It does says that it is a right for the PEOPLE to bare arms.

Wrong, Scalia said this in Heller, he also stated the 2nd A. was not an absolute right. Lies by omission are still lies, but you know this! And that makes you a liar.

The 2nd A. wording has been parsed over and over, it what you posted was true, the 2nd would not have included the first two phrases: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State"

Please explain why these two phrases were included, if the original intent was solely: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"?

 

[jknowgood]

Let me know how the new laws keep another mass murder not to happen.

another Idiot-gram ^^^ from the crazy right wing.

Let know how the gun control prevents the liberal to do a mass shooting. Idiot lol.

 

[martybegan]

These laws will not withstand a constitutional challenge.

Especially the one that bans any semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine. Plus it creates two classes of citizens, because people who already own them can keep theirs if they register it.

 

[JimBowie1958]

New California Law Lowers the Bar for Gun Seizures
Legislation allows temporary confiscation of guns from people considered a danger to themselves or others

"""....

California, which already has some of the toughest gun restrictions in the nation, this week moved forward with a sweeping new package of gun control laws that underscores the power of the Democratically controlled state to carve its own path on the issue. On Friday, Gov. Jerry Brown signed six gun-control bills into law, including an expansion of the 1989 law known as the assault weapons ban.

Under the confiscation law, which went into effect in January, California residents can lose their weapons without being convicted of a crime, or being institutionalized. Police or immediate family members must persuade a judge to sign off on what is called a gun violence restraining order, which lasts up to 21 days, but can be extended. (O/P's note: Fantastic!)

The law has so far been used to seize guns in 33 cases, in some instances from mentally unstable people who had made threats or were suicidal, according to data through mid-June provided to The Wall Street Journal by the California attorney general and law-enforcement agencies."""

New California Law Lowers the Bar for Gun Seizures

It is very convenient that California give us all an example of how much they want to take our guns away by any contrivance imaginable so close to the general election.

 

[JimBowie1958]

- American citizens should NOT have the unlimited right to protect themselves, so they should not be allowed to possess guns.
(exceptions for the elites and military...and of course criminals, but liberals are not aware that criminals don't abide by the law)