6 Dem congressmen/woman call for INSURRECTION against the trump administration

This is what I quoted from you. In post 70

So, you changed the context by claiming that what you meant by "charged" was putting out an indictment or something. Something that doesn't make sense in context. Why would I even assume you have that power? And simply ignore the second sentence.

Just so you could claim that you didn't say this to claim that this is the crime you think they committed.

So one of us is playing "language games" it isn't me.
Charge = A legal application of authority

Opinion = The beliefs and world views of an individual human.
 
In the wake of Charlie Kirk, there were calls by the right to end the violent rhetoric under accusations it was fueling hate and violence (which I agree with). I guess the president didn't get that memo.

Trump doubles down and calls for the execution of Democrat lawmakers. More from Trump claims their words are seditious and states they should be put to death.

For the record, sedition is the advocacy of violence against the government. The lawmakers involved were advocating peace by the government. It's kind of literally the opposition of sedition.

Screenshot2025-11-20at10.42.41AM.png


It should also be noted that the maximum punishment under the actual sedition statute is 20 years, it does not include death.

Not in agreement with Trump on this, but, those six should face consequences for their seditious remarks…and shame on you Taz for using the most skewed site you could find…says volumes about you.
 
Charge = A legal application of authority

Opinion = The beliefs and world views of an individual human.
Yes and charge in this context is that you meant that that was the charge that "in your opinion" should be levied. Hence the second sentence that you ignored. Again nobody is presuming or would logically presume you have that power.

Again, "language games"
This is not my first rodeo. And changing the meaning of what you said is a common tactic when people like you can't keep their story straight for more than 2 posts.
 
15th post
That's how stupid he thinks they are.

Is he right?

I plead the fifth. :lol: But I will say this....I'm just as amazed now with this current phenomenon as I was when I saw the same exact thing during Mr. Slick Clinton's presidency. He literally could do no wrong in his loyalists' eyes.

 
In the wake of Charlie Kirk, there were calls by the right to end the violent rhetoric under accusations it was fueling hate and violence (which I agree with). I guess the president didn't get that memo.

Trump doubles down and calls for the execution of Democrat lawmakers. More from Trump claims their words are seditious and states they should be put to death.

For the record, sedition is the advocacy of violence against the government. The lawmakers involved were advocating peace by the government. It's kind of literally the opposition of sedition.

Screenshot2025-11-20at10.42.41AM.png


It should also be noted that the maximum punishment under the actual sedition statute is 20 years, it does not include death.

Execution - the carrying out of a plan, order, or course of action.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom