6 Dem congressmen/woman call for INSURRECTION against the trump administration

[BackAgain]

Yes

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115582703277798715

So then, the accurate answer is “no.”

He threatened nobody with death

And has already been noted, sedition is not a death penalty matter, anyway.

Do try to keep up, you ridiculous troll.

 

[forkup]

Yes. But none have been given. To suggest that orders are unlawful, would be sedition. So far, the liberal DEMs have couched their language to not cross the line ... yet!

I really, really.... really would like it that people look up the definition of words before they utter them with such great confidence.

 

[BackAgain]

They wet themselves over Schumer telling Gorsuch "We're coming for you," but Trump says six members of Congress should be hanged and excuses, excuses, excuses from the cult.

Not what he said.

One might expect a higher level of posting from you.

One would be disappointed.

 

[BackAgain]

I really, really.... really would like it that people look up the definition of words before they utter them with such great confidence.

Too bad that doesn’t include you.

Alas.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

^^^ This should offend Jewish people.

Comparing Trump to Hitler make Hitler not seem as bad.

Adolf thinks trump has gone too far.
I Vud neva get away with this sht TOMMY

 

[RhodyPatriot]

They wet themselves over Schumer telling Gorsuch "We're coming for you,"

Yeah.

He didn't just say it to Gorsuch.

He said it to all the conservative justices right outside the Supreme Court including adding "Reap the Whirlwind!"

Then an assassination attempt was incoming shortly thereafter.

In fact, which side keeps trying to kill the other side's politicians?

It's pretty obvious.

To the unbiased who don't get their "news" from ******* Daily KOS.

 

[forkup]

So then, the accurate answer is “no.”

He threatened nobody with death

And has already been noted, sedition is not a death penalty matter, anyway.

Do try to keep up, you ridiculous troll.

I never said threatened, I said deserved

the president of the United States saying publicly that six US congressmen deserve death?

So, the accurate answer is yes, that's exactly what he said. But A for effort for this turd.

And the point that I was making has never been that he would personally order their death. But that he is "cavalier" suggesting it. Care to try your hand at some more polishing? I know you don't mind the smell.

 

[TNHarley]

So now MAGA wants the military to abide by illegal orders?

 

[forkup]

Too bad that doesn’t include you.

Alas.

It seems to me that I have a better understanding of words than you do. I for instance don't confuse the word threaten with deserve.

 

[Nobody911]

American citizens can oppose illegal orders issued by the US president due to the principles established in the Constitution and the rule of law. Here’s how and why they can do so:

1. Constitutional Protections: The U.S. Constitution outlines the framework for government authority and individual rights. Citizens have the right to free speech and assembly, allowing them to voice dissent against illegal orders.
2. Legal Framework: If a presidential order is deemed unconstitutional or illegal, citizens can challenge it through the courts. The judiciary serves as a check on executive power, ensuring that actions taken by the president comply with the law.
3. Civil Disobedience: Citizens may engage in civil disobedience as a form of protest against unjust laws or orders. This nonviolent resistance can draw public attention and lead to legal and social consequences for the individual, but it is a recognized form of opposition.
4. Political Participation: Citizens can participate in political processes by contacting their representatives, voting, or forming movements to advocate against the order. Engaging in the democratic process can influence change and uphold the rule of law.
In sum, the ability to oppose illegal orders stems from constitutional rights, access to the judiciary, and participation in democratic processes, reinforcing the principle that no one is above the law, not even the president.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Adolf thinks trump has gone too far.
I Vud neva get away with this sht TOMMY

Hitler killed millions of jews systematically in camps and you compare him to Trump.

That is antisemitic to its core.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It appears that they have no idea what they're talking about. I know: Shocking.

Yes, a military person can refuse a direct order if they believe it is unlawful. If they are later court martialed for it, they are liable if they were wrong. But they indeed CAN refuse a direct order if they believe it is unlawful. Fact.

No, no one is saying that Trump has issued any unlawful orders. That, of course, is not the point. That's not what the people in the PSA are saying. So that's just a weak, transparent straw man the Trumpsters are trying to spin.

They want a ******* American Pinochet. Our Founders did not. Our Founders were trying to protect us from EXACTLY what is happening RIGHT NOW. We'll see how it goes.

Then WHY are they saying it? Bet you can't answer that one?

They are saying it so some disgruntled military member will misinterpret their statement and believe a lawful order is illegal and not follow it. That is their entire purpose in making that stupid pronouncement.

Mark Kelly is the first husband of a wife shot in the head that suffered brain damage, making him a Democrat!

They wet themselves over Schumer telling Gorsuch "We're coming for you," but Trump says six members of Congress should be hanged and excuses, excuses, excuses from the cult.

Well, except he didn't say that, did he?

 

[Mack The Finger]

Democrats are trying to stretch and say that if you call them traitors, that is a threat.

I hear ya...they live in another world.

BTW: do you know if any LIBs try to assinate Trump...lately ?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

For the record, sedition is the advocacy of violence against the government.

In other words, what Trump is doing.

Every accusation = a confession

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes. But none have been given.

The warning is for the future, not the past, professor.

 

[Mac-7]

What happens to trump if the killings are deemed to be illegal? Conviction in abstentia in the Hague? Impeachment? Resignation?

That will depend entirely on who controls the senate in the coming years

The Hague has no authority over US presidents

 

[berg80]

Yes. But none have been given. To suggest that orders are unlawful, would be sedition. So far, the liberal DEMs have couched their language to not cross the line ... yet!

I invite defenders of all things Don to read why what he is ordering to be done is illegal.

Legal Flaws in the Trump Administration’s Notice to Congress on “Armed Conflict” with Drug Cartels​

Legal Flaws in the Trump Administration’s Notice to Congress on “Armed Conflict” with Drug Cartels

Top legal expert analyzes the Trump administration's notice to Congress of an "armed conflict" with drug cartels.

www.justsecurity.org

 

[berg80]

That will depend entirely on who controls the senate in the coming years

The Hague has no authority over US presidents

Neither do US courts from what I can see.

 

[BackAgain]

I never said threatened, I said deserved

He also didn’t say that.

So, the accurate answer is yes, that's exactly what he said. But A for effort for this turd.

No. It isn’t. So you get another F, you turd.

And the point that I was making has never been that he would personally order their death. But that he is "cavalier" suggesting it. Care to try your hand at some more polishing? I know you don't mind the smell.

No. He was apparently conflating sedition and treason. But in neither case was he being cavalier.

Try your hand at honesty. I KNOW you can’t abide that.

 

[BackAgain]

Neither do US courts from what I can see.

But of course, you can’t see anything with your head always so far up your ass.