6 Dem congressmen/woman call for INSURRECTION against the trump administration

"18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy​

prev | next
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)"




1763680126279.webp
 
AND Democrats resorted to this video because they have lost in the courts. Failing to stop Trump via the courts, now they seek to directly undermine the commander in chief, the law and courts be damned. Dems can't point to a single order Trump has given that wasn't legal.
 
That explains why you didn't understand my post!
Yet you can't explain why.

And my post explains why he says immoral and impeachable things like this:

He hopes the more violent members of his cult get the message.
 
Too bad these democrats are not in the military, Trump could order a general to shoot them at sunrise. But I just don't think the GOP has the stones to impeach these six, sad, in a way, our system of jurisprudence does not work at all.
For about the 1000th time I have posted on this forum, READ YOUR CONSTITUTION! You can't impeach members of Congress!
 

"18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy​

prev | next
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)"




View attachment 1186107
What does that have to do with anything?

Refusing illegal orders is not sedition. In fact, it's protected by law.
 
Last edited:
Just because some leftists have no respect for the chain of command doesn't mean I shouldn't.

;)
Now you can describe for us how refusing an illegal order represents lack of respect for the chain of command.

See you in never, because that's the dumbest shit anyone has ever heard.
 
GIs and their dependents have been given every shot known to man, forever.
Good reason to never vote for ignorant self serving Democrat politicians and I'm not so sure on the dependents..
 

"18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy​

prev | next
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)"




View attachment 1186107
Well, except they didn't do that.

The biggest mistake made by those in opposition of the statement was designed by the statement itself. Nothing said in the video was false. That makes it kind of hard to prove a crime, doesn't it? However, the suggestion that some orders have been given that might have been illegal isn't specifically stated. You would have a severely difficult time proving a violation of the law by what was actually said, even though everyone knows what they meant.
 
The folks the blowhard wants to hang were reminding those who serve of their oath to the Constitution.

Such a patriotic statement should not trigger such an hysterical call to violence,

If the blowhard orders anyone to hang public servants, I trust they will defer to the Constitution rather than appease the blowhard's implicit claim that he can override the Constitution.
Their Commies. Slotnick really lost the election as an example. The Commies cult of course cheated, and she was anointed as Senator.
 
The irony here, of course, is that Trump IMMEDIATELY showed exactly why this warning had to be issued.
 


Let's put this simply: democrats are forcing a collision between the democrats party and the government. Democrats are like a car full of crazy people ahead of you on the highways weaving wildly until they crash into you, just so they can tell the cops that show up that you hit therm--- they did their best to avoid you, but you swerved wildly into them forcing the collision.

The democrat party must go and its leaders imprisoned for insurrection, but the GOP just keeps trying to avoid the inevitable:
  1. They stole an election.
  2. They set up a confrontation with capitol police so they could blame it on Trump.
  3. They spent a year in hearings trying to hang Trump and sway public opinion with fake evidence.
  4. They spent two more years in illegal, twisted attempts to prosecute him for fake crimes.
  5. They tried to destroy him with a 3/4 billion dollar fine for a difference in opinion over a clerical entry in a book that if it were even really an actual crime, the time to prosecute had already long expired, but they did it anyway.
  6. They have tried to protect illegals while banning ICE from doing its job.
  7. Now they are calling for our military to stand in insurrection against their own commander.
This is no longer a matter of mere committee, negotiation, or settlement--- the democrat party is a seditious, out of control anti-American treasonous threat to the country which must be disbanded and its leaders arrested. Literally 9 out of 10 of every problem in this country is now tied to the actions of the democrats.
 
I keep saying This cannot be repaired through legal channels.
They went outside the bounds to get us here ----

Excellent synopsis and point---

You just don't try to drive out of a location that you only got to by helicopter in the first place.
 
The irony here, of course, is that Trump IMMEDIATELY showed exactly why this warning had to be issued.


Still waiting for you and all of the other lefties on here to condone or condemn your party telling the military to cause obstruction as so far it hasn't happened yet.
 
You are an idiot. They said ILLEGAL orders. He is calling for their MURDER for restating their oath of office.
Our nation is becoming more and more numb to ethics, morals, integrity and character. Even though many people have a lot of it. We are ready for televised death hunt programs. And we have so many potential players in that type of arena. The big club is ready for their comeuppance. A dictatorship would jump on this as the people vying for leadership whittle down their opponents. Think of the ratings. With people working on different types of death hunts pitting them against each other.
 
Well, except they didn't do that.

The biggest mistake made by those in opposition of the statement was designed by the statement itself. Nothing said in the video was false. That makes it kind of hard to prove a crime, doesn't it? However, the suggestion that some orders have been given that might have been illegal isn't specifically stated. You would have a severely difficult time proving a violation of the law by what was actually said, even though everyone knows what they meant.

You are just speaking about their public statement. What has their little conspiracy said in emails, text messaging, etc?

They opened a door and the DOJ is going to drive a truck through it.
 
15th post

"18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy​


Rock & Roll. I mean, let's get serious, never mind they are calling for sedition against the US government, but they are already announcing what crimes they intend if they get back in power starting with prosecuting every member of ICE.

Democrats: arrest all the federal agents and turn loose the rapists, thugs and murderers! That is literally their mantra.
 
So to the media it is only a problem when Trump/Right wing people call for the hanging of people, but when the left does even worse, they get a free pass for it.
 
Back
Top Bottom