EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 95,000
- 71,022
- 3,645
Who decides whether or not the order is unlawful?Your father suggested orders should be obeyed even when they are unlawful?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who decides whether or not the order is unlawful?Your father suggested orders should be obeyed even when they are unlawful?
Well that makes sense!So in other words, you are an advocate for the policy that before any order is followed in the military, it should be reviewed for legality first.
So when Eisenhower, Patton, or MacArthur, JFK, or any military leader gives an order to attack, we should submit the order for legal review for a few weeks first before a panel of constitutional experts first to determine if our commander's orders are even legal first while our troops and country are getting the shit kicked out of them.
Just who do you work for exactly?

Another one who can't answer.STFU! Off topic, dumbass!
Then its not an issue is it.Trump has never given an unlawful order. I laugh at your idea of fascism.
Rock & Roll. I mean, let's get serious, never mind they are calling for sedition against the US government, but they are already announcing what crimes they intend if they get back in power starting with prosecuting every member of ICE.
Democrats: arrest all the federal agents and turn loose the rapists, thugs and murderers! That is literally their mantra.
The inevitable call to violence.I keep saying
This cannot be repaired through legal channels.
They went outside the bounds to get us here ----
Who is "us?"
Thats not parsing. Its their oath of enlustment.
The inevitable call to violence.
It is the duty of anyone who swears an oath to the Constitution to refuse to follow illegal orders.They are advocating for the overthrow of the US government and the refusal to carry out directives by their commander. Senators and congressmen know little enough about the Constitution--- constitutional scholars themselves often disagree as to the meanings--- I've yet to meet a single jarhead serving along the front lines who was a "constitutional scholar" on the side to be able to meaningfully and dutifully question the "constitutionality" of any and every directive given him.
What you are really advocating for is the collapse of our military.
English please, Hot Sauce.That's your stumble?
It is the duty of anyone who swears an oath to the Constitution to refuse to follow illegal orders.
English please, Hot Sauce.That's your stumble?
Right, he should explain something to someone who is totally clueless about the basics of this issue, but pretends he's an authority.Enlistment? Show me where....
We have never had a President call for the murder of his political opponents before.
Members of the military are legally obligated to obey the orders of the President of the United States and the officers appointed over them, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The UCMJ states that an order is lawful unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders. This means that service members can refuse to obey orders that violate the law or the Constitution.Completely missing the actual discussion, Einstein.
English please, Hot Sauce.
Your shithole scumbag's advocating death for those who advocate Constitutional fidelity is unAmerican.Well, never mind that Obumma had an American citizen hunted down and executed overseas without due process, shitferbrains, all Trump has stated is the obvious that calling for an overthrow of the government by other government officials is insurrection.
The fact is that no president other than Trump has ever had to deal with shithole scumbags as the democrap party has become since GW Bush left office.
Since GW Bush left on 1/21/09, it has been all democraps all the time except for Trump, and it has all been perilously downhill since, except for Trump pulling us out of a dive.
Those six democrats ought to be pulled from their beds at 4AM tomorrow morning, then arrested and charged with sedition with intent to overthrow the USA.
You gotta be kidding me! This is the military. We should not have been in WW 1, WW 2, Korea, Viet Nam, Middle East 1 and Middle East 2 from your statement. That mantra died when we had the Spanish American War before we changed our gold and silver backed currency in 1913 to a Fiat currency to make wars easy. You live good because that was what your currency became and where the real economic and financial power emanates from the area known as "the city" in London.Your crackpot nonsense aside, it is the duty of those who swear an oath to the Constitution to refuse illegal orders.