6 Dem congressmen/woman call for INSURRECTION against the trump administration

He also didn't say, "Storm the Capitol and stop congress so I can win the election", but thats the message that was received.

Surely you understand this. Surely you understand that a president's words carry weight. That some people interpret them as both orders and permission.

That explains why you didn't understand my post!
 
The Biden Administration forced military members to take the covid shot, just wondering how you felt about that?
.
GIs and their dependents have been given every shot known to man, forever.
 
There's no law the unhinged Democrats won't break to undermine this president and the American people who put him in office. Democrats are so unhinged by losing power there's nothing not even assassination they won't use to desperately try to claw back that power.

Absolutely - Democrats understand the big picture

And the dumb ******* Republicans fight with each other over minute details -
 
So in other words, you are an advocate for the policy that before any order is followed in the military, it should be reviewed for legality first.

So when Eisenhower, Patton, or MacArthur, JFK, or any military leader gives an order to attack, we should submit the order for legal review for a few weeks first before a panel of constitutional experts first to determine if our commander's orders are even legal first while our troops and country are getting the shit kicked out of them.

Just who do you work for exactly?
The Dem's meaning was clear, DEFY president Trump's orders.
 
The warning is for the future, not theiSNT IT SOMETHING past, professor.iS

Post 161 leads you to a legal review. It doesn't just say what order was illegal but why.
Diint american soldiers swear an oath to serve trump ?
Certainly the illegal bombings in the west indies and the troops on the streets of the US rause concerns.
 
That should be amended to say "disobey legal orders." Big difference between legal and illegal.

Please give us a list of illegal orders from a commander and at least one example of a time such an order was ever given.
 
The Dem's meaning was clear, DEFY president Trump's orders.

Too bad these democrats are not in the military, Trump could order a general to shoot them at sunrise. But I just don't think the GOP has the stones to impeach these six, sad, in a way, our system of jurisprudence does not work at all.
 
15th post
In the wake of Charlie Kirk, there were calls by the right to end the violent rhetoric under accusations it was fueling hate and violence (which I agree with). I guess the president didn't get that memo.

Trump doubles down and calls for the execution of Democrat lawmakers. More from Trump claims their words are seditious and states they should be put to death.

For the record, sedition is the advocacy of violence against the government. The lawmakers involved were advocating peace by the government. It's kind of literally the opposition of sedition.

Screenshot2025-11-20at10.42.41AM.png


It should also be noted that the maximum punishment under the actual sedition statute is 20 years, it does not include death.

The folks the blowhard wants to hang were reminding those who serve of their oath to the Constitution.

Such a patriotic statement should not trigger such an hysterical call to violence,

If the blowhard orders anyone to hang public servants, I trust they will defer to the Constitution rather than appease the blowhard's implicit claim that he can override the Constitution.
 
Too bad these democrats are not in the military, Trump could order a general to shoot them at sunrise. But I just don't think the GOP has the stones to impeach these six, sad, in a way, our system of jurisprudence does not work at all.

I keep saying

This cannot be repaired through legal channels.

They went outside the bounds to get us here ----
 
Back
Top Bottom