6 Dem congressmen/woman call for INSURRECTION against the trump administration

Our troops swore an oath to the Constitution and they are legally required to disobey any order that would violate the Constitution or the UCMJ. It can also be argued that those same troops are to abide by international laws and treaties of which the US is party and therefore obligated to disobey orders that would cause any of those laws or provisions to be violated.

It really is amazing how much leftist feelings know about every subject on this forum.
 
For making sure that our military knows that they do not have to obey illegal orders from their leaders, the Sec of Defense or the president.
Actually they do or they will be court martialed and shot at sunrise or thrown in prison.

Be respectful about it, say "No Sir or No Mam, that order is illegal, and therefore I am not Constitutionally bound to obey it." You are protected by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or UCMJ.
Good luck trying that bullshit.
 
Sedition, telling the military to disobey direct orders

We see what democrats are doing, they are encouraging sedition.

This is extreme political warfare, now democrats are actively encouraging the military to be part of a coup
 
He also didn't say, "Storm the Capitol and stop congress so I can win the election", but thats the message that was received.
Horseshit.
Surely you understand this. Surely you understand that a president's words carry weight. That some people interpret them as both orders and permission.
They do.

And I’m gonna surprise you right now. I disagree with what he did actually say. And I further agree that his words could be construed as an invitation (by some moron) to use violence against Sen, Kelly and those others.

But that wasn’t my point. My point was: Criticize what he actually DID say, but don’t undercut your own objection by putting words in his mouth. (And I don’t mean you. I mean those who misquoted him.)
 
Dupe

 
Democrats seem to embrace illogical behavior at every opportunity, I'm glad their fading to zero relevance and a precautionary farce of humanity.
 
This is not a mistake or a poorly worded statement; it is a calculated and dangerous escalation in their decade-long campaign of resistance against President Trump and the voters who support him.

They do not believe he is a legitimate president, and they will stop at nothing, including attempting to cripple the command structure of our armed forces, to remove him from power.

It is a sickening spectacle that every patriot must condemn.
 
Post 118. And I'm just a guy on the internet just like you. Apparently, some of you cared enough to quote something that was directed at me, claiming i didn't answer a question I did.

Now my question is. If "we" don't care, why are you even responding?
No you didn't. You posted an article about the UN. What does that have to do with anything alleged as being illegal by these Senators. They mentioned NOTHING, dumbass!
 
Horseshit.
Well, you're wrong. We have hours and hours of video of them explicitly calling Trump's tweets, " Orders"

Nearly to a man, they said that they received the message that Trump wanted them to do that.

So get your reflexive tantrum over with, then come back to reality.

See you then.
 
In the wake of Charlie Kirk, there were calls by the right to end the violent rhetoric under accusations it was fueling hate and violence (which I agree with). I guess the president didn't get that memo.

Trump doubles down and calls for the execution of Democrat lawmakers. More from Trump claims their words are seditious and states they should be put to death.

For the record, sedition is the advocacy of violence against the government. The lawmakers involved were advocating peace by the government. It's kind of literally the opposition of sedition.

Screenshot2025-11-20at10.42.41AM.png


It should also be noted that the maximum punishment under the actual sedition statute is 20 years, it does not include death.


You know he's lying, why bother answering him?
 
That should be amended to say "disobey legal orders." Big difference between legal and illegal.

So in other words, you are an advocate for the policy that before any order is followed in the military, it should be reviewed for legality first.

So when Eisenhower, Patton, or MacArthur, JFK, or any military leader gives an order to attack, we should submit the order for legal review for a few weeks first before a panel of constitutional experts first to determine if our commander's orders are even legal first while our troops and country are getting the shit kicked out of them.

Just who do you work for exactly?
 
He also didn't say, "Storm the Capitol and stop congress so I can win the election", but thats the message that was received.

Surely you understand this. Surely you understand that a president's words carry weight. That some people interpret them as both orders and permission.
Not what he said. Nowhere near in fact. You know that and can't handle the truth. You are simply a lying sack of shit because that's what you wanted him to say, and don't have the honesty to admit it. Your TDS us rotting your brain. seek help!
 
15th post
This is not a mistake or a poorly worded statement; it is a calculated and dangerous escalation in their decade-long campaign of resistance against President Trump and the voters who support him.
There's no law the unhinged Democrats won't break to undermine this president and the American people who put him in office. Democrats are so unhinged by losing power there's nothing not even assassination they won't use to desperately try to claw back that power.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom