6 Dem congressmen/woman call for INSURRECTION against the trump administration


For making sure that our military knows that they do not have to obey illegal orders from their leaders, the Sec of Defense or the president. Be respectful about it, say "No Sir or No Mam, that order is illegal, and therefore I am not Constitutionally bound to obey it." You are protected by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or UCMJ.

Now we all know that the president and his Sec of Defense, not being the brightest crackers in the barrel, will threaten you with all sorts of dire consequences if you refuse to obey an illegal order. But, stand firm, the courts will back you up. It might pay to remind them of the Nuremberg trials after WWII.
Unfortunately, we have a history of undeclared wars with the Progressive leaders violating them. The Viet Nam War was a Progressive Socialist production. It was prog versus prog with the Republicans sitting on their hands with a draft based on picking ping pong balls out for birth dates. Ironically a forced draft like that may have many people not show up because a growing number of men will not die for women anymore.
 
So to the media it is only a problem when Trump/Right wing people call for the hanging of people, but when the left does even worse, they get a free pass for it.
What officeholders other than Trump are calling for people to be hanged for advocating fidelity to the Constitution?
 
it is the duty of those who swear an oath to the Constitution to refuse illegal orders.

It is the duty of the military to follow the orders from their commanders without question. If one of those orders later proves in violation of the Constitution and you refused to carry it out, you better be prepared to prove it at your hearing and pray they don't put you before the firing squad first.
 
You are just speaking about their public statement. What has their little conspiracy said in emails, text messaging, etc?

They opened a door and the DOJ is going to drive a truck through it.
What authorization are you going to use to investigate? Their statement is factual. What crime has been committed?

The DEMs just had their asses handed to them over Jack Smith's illegal searches, getting Senator's phone records without their knowledge.

What they actually did is a brilliant political move. They can say something that is true and alluding to the fact that something illegal might be happening without calling the specific act illegal. It's like plausible deniability. They can scream, "That's not what we meant!" and it is true, but not what they wanted to do. All we can do is call them out on what they are alluding to, but you cannot prove they did it with true malicious intent.
 

For making sure that our military knows that they do not have to obey illegal orders from their leaders, the Sec of Defense or the president. Be respectful about it, say "No Sir or No Mam, that order is illegal, and therefore I am not Constitutionally bound to obey it." You are protected by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or UCMJ.

Now we all know that the president and his Sec of Defense, not being the brightest crackers in the barrel, will threaten you with all sorts of dire consequences if you refuse to obey an illegal order. But, stand firm, the courts will back you up. It might pay to remind them of the Nuremberg trials after WWII.
This is actual sedition
 
What officeholders other than Trump are calling for people to be hanged for advocating fidelity to the Constitution?

They are advocating for the overthrow of the US government and the refusal to carry out directives by their commander. Senators and congressmen know little enough about the Constitution--- constitutional scholars themselves often disagree as to the meanings--- I've yet to meet a single jarhead serving along the front lines who was a "constitutional scholar" on the side to be able to meaningfully and dutifully question the "constitutionality" of any and every directive given him.

What you are really advocating for is the collapse of our military.
 
This is a call for treason but democrats know the press will always take their side. If republicans had tried this 2 years ago . . .



Illegal orders haven't been given by the president. He's relying on the Constitution and federal laws to do what the Demoncrats were ignoring. Also, after Trump was elected, there was a significant surge in enlistments, so the military will stand with their Commander-in-Chief.
 
What authorization are you going to use to investigate? Their statement is factual. What crime has been committed?

The DEMs just had their asses handed to them over Jack Smith's illegal searches, getting Senator's phone records without their knowledge.

What they actually did is a brilliant political move. They can say something that is true and alluding to the fact that something illegal might be happening without calling the specific act illegal. It's like plausible deniability. They can scream, "That's not what we meant!" and it is true, but not what they wanted to do. All we can do is call them out on what they are alluding to, but you cannot prove they did it with true malicious intent.

Authorization? Who is in charge of DOJ and the Executive Branch?

Oh, these Democrats will know.

Seizing the conspiracy's communications will be the brilliant political move. Then, the DOJ can release the evidence.
 
15th post

For making sure that our military knows that they do not have to obey illegal orders from their leaders, the Sec of Defense or the president. Be respectful about it, say "No Sir or No Mam, that order is illegal, and therefore I am not Constitutionally bound to obey it." You are protected by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or UCMJ.

Now we all know that the president and his Sec of Defense, not being the brightest crackers in the barrel, will threaten you with all sorts of dire consequences if you refuse to obey an illegal order. But, stand firm, the courts will back you up. It might pay to remind them of the Nuremberg trials after WWII.

So what were Trump's illegal orders?
 
Yet you can't explain why.

And my post explains why he says immoral and impeachable things like this:

He hopes the more violent members of his cult get the message.

I said Trump is full of crap and I'm not sure why anyone would take him seriously ESPECIALLY when it comes to holding democrats accountable for ANYTHING
 
Back
Top Bottom