500 scientists say there is no climate emergency

[ding]

Why?

Because it will show just how much the planet's landmass and ocean circulation system is uniquely configured for COLDER temperatures and climate fluctuations and environmental uncertainty. As well as what the true catastrophic risk is to mankind from climate changes which is colder temperatures and not warmer temperatures.

 

[ding]

All of this will free climate scientists from their current bondage and allegiance to AGW and will give them a new crisis to justify their jobs and grants. They will be free to criticize the past narrative of AGW and will find plenty of evidence to discuss using the empirical climate evidence of the geologic record.

 

[Delldude]

Liar. You have never read a word of it.

You mean the one where they claim humans have unequivocally caused climate change?
There has been no scientific data that has said unequivocally......only things like 'may' or 'could' be 'linked'.

Get with it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How so?

Because when someone doesn't do something, it doesn't mean they cant. Your illogic is what the mind of a child looks like.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What’s happening with AMOC?

Scientists discuss the state of the Atlantic Ocean’s ‘conveyor belt’

www.whoi.edu

Oh look, a video you didn't watch and a link you didn't read.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You mean the one where they claim humans have unequivocally caused climate change?

And there is the proof you have never read a word of it

Just give liars all the rope they need. The will just expose themselves.

 

[Delldude]

And there is the proof you have never read a word of it

Just give liars all the rope they need. The will just expose themselves.

So you didn't read it is what you're saying?

That is one of their findings from it.........there are more bizarre claims......

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you didn't read it is what you're saying?

That is one of their findings from it.........there are more bizarre claims......

You didn't read it, is what you are saying, with your weird lies.

You can stop. You aren't fooling anyone.

 

[Robert W]

Well that's the most idiotic and childish lie any of us will read for quite a while. How fking stupid.

You can't prove it if your life depended on it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You can't prove it if your life depended on it.

Prove what? You don't even know what you are whining about.

 

[Robert W]

I would have to say the funniest moment in the history of the climate science denial industry was when the Kochs funded a climate study they hoped would undermine the consensus. It was pretty expensive.

Naturally, the study confirmed the already existing consensus of the evidence.

Good stuff.

You can't prove that.

 

[Robert W]

Prove what? You don't even know what you are whining about.

You should feel better about yourself should you stop whining.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You can't prove that.

I don't need to prove publicly available facts to random internet crybabies. Anyone can look it up.

 

[Robert W]

I don't need to prove publicly available facts to random internet crybabies. Anyone can look it up.

I provided proof and you told on your children by calling them liars.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I provided proof and you told on your children by calling them liars.

No you didn't. You are one bizarre little person.

 

[Crick]

You mean the one where they claim humans have unequivocally caused climate change?
There has been no scientific data that has said unequivocally......only things like 'may' or 'could' be 'linked'.

Get with it.

View attachment 854914

The IPCC's Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers, uses the term twice in its introduction: speaking first of human causation of temperature increase and then of rising carbon dioxide. "Unequivocal"

 

[Robert W]

No you didn't. You are one bizarre little person.

I did. And you are lying again. And you talk shit about little children. What kind of teacher does that to little kids?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I did. And you are lying again. And you talk shit about little children. What kind of teacher does that to little kids?

Nobody wants to hear a grown man whine.

 

[ding]

And why a lie and not just wrong? How would the collapse of the AMOC show that he had been lied to? And why would it go in that direction anyway? I would have said that the collapse of the AMOC would show YOU that everything YOU believe on this topic is false. The AMOC will have stopped with no change in the glacial/interglacial cycle, no change in the tectonic configuration of the planet, no change in the thermal isolation of either pole. Why do you think the collapse of the AMOC would help your side in this debate?

It's funny that you don't understand the significance and consequence of the collapse of the AMOC.

It will show just how much the planet's landmass and ocean circulation system is uniquely configured for COLDER temperatures and climate fluctuations and environmental uncertainty. As well as what the true catastrophic risk is to mankind from climate changes which is colder temperatures and not warmer temperatures.

It will free climate scientists from their current bondage and allegiance to AGW and will give them a new crisis to justify their jobs and grants. They will be free to criticize the past narrative of AGW and will find plenty of evidence to discuss using the empirical climate evidence of the geologic record.

Your world will crumble around your feet.

 

[ding]

Because when someone doesn't do something, it doesn't mean they cant. Your illogic is what the mind of a child looks like.

No. That's isn't necessarily true. Your logic is flawed.

You're upset. It's understandable.