danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #21
yes, it is about the class warfare of appealing to ignorance of any clue and any Cause.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Capitalism puts the control of the means of production in a very few private hands. When technological improvements like computers reduce the demand for labor, isn't it only natural those relatively few hands belonging to CEOs and their boards of directors feel entitled to keep 90% of the resulting productivity gains?Why?
yes, it is about the class warfare of appealing to ignorance of any clue and any Cause.
"Here’s how FDR summed it up:Great. Now back to the subject of the OP.
Restoring the minimum wage to a level corresponding to half the average wage (as it was in the late 1960s), and providing workers a real chance to obtain and practice collective bargaining would go a long way in reestablishing a link between productivity and pay.I believe we merely need to reserve labor from that market at the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage for wages to better correlate with productivity, with that form of full employment of resources in that market
"Is America in the throes of a class war?yes, it is about the class warfare of appealing to ignorance of any clue and any Cause.
"Here’s how FDR summed it up:Great. Now back to the subject of the OP.
“'The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism—ownership of Government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.'” (Franklin D. Roosevelt: “Message to Congress on Curbing Monopolies.,” April 29, 1938. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project.
Is this what you had in mind, Vet?
40 Years of Economic Policy in One Chart CounterPunch Tells the Facts Names the Names
I believe we merely need to reserve labor from that market at the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage for wages to better correlate with productivity, with that form of full employment of resources in that market.
I think automation played a huge role, jet engines and computers, for example, make it possible for management to control a workforce on the opposite side of the planet nearly as efficiently as one on the opposite side of the street. I suspect all the productivity gains of the past forty years have gone to capital because of the basic architecture of capitalism itself. What is to become of millions of workers displaced by technology?
Supply and demand?No, I was merely explaining why wages have stagnated. It's not some nefarious plot, it's not class warfare, it's simple economics.
Supply and demand?No, I was merely explaining why wages have stagnated. It's not some nefarious plot, it's not class warfare, it's simple economics.
Wages stagnated because women were driven into the workforce by stagnating wages?
Sounds circular.
Jet air travel and computers partially explain how capitalists in the US and Europe were able to outsource middle class jobs across an ocean without jeopardizing any control over their workforce. I don't think it's coincidental that US wages began stagnating when computers and jet engines revolutionized capitalism.That was nothing but a bunch of randomly assembled statements which have no logical connection whatsoever. Accessibility of air travel is not automation.
Are you saying wages stagnated because women entered the work force?Not sure what you don't understand. No one said women were driven into the workforce. SMH. It's like talking to children.
Jet air travel and computers partially explain how capitalists in the US and Europe were able to outsource middle class jobs across an ocean without jeopardizing any control over their workforce. I don't think it's coincidental that US wages began stagnating when computers and jet engines revolutionized capitalism.That was nothing but a bunch of randomly assembled statements which have no logical connection whatsoever. Accessibility of air travel is not automation.
Are you saying wages stagnated because women entered the work force?Not sure what you don't understand. No one said women were driven into the workforce. SMH. It's like talking to children.
Even if you're correct about women entering the workforce in the 1970s was responsible for wage stagnation (and you've offered no proof it is) how would that explain the fact that between 2000 and 2012 wages were flat or declined for the entire bottom 60% of wage distribution despite productivity growing by almost 25% over that period?Yes. Finally you see it
Even if you're correct about women entering the workforce in the 1970s was responsible for wage stagnation (and you've offered no proof it is) how would that explain the fact that between 2000 and 2012 wages were flat or declined for the entire bottom 60% of wage distribution despite productivity growing by almost 25% over that period?Yes. Finally you see it
A Decade of Flat Wages The Key Barrier to Shared Prosperity and a Rising Middle Class Economic Policy Institute
In your mind, apparently. You've established a correlation between women entering the workforce in the 1970s and wage stagnation, but you've shown no proof women entering the workforce forty years ago caused wage stagnation.And to answer your question, the law of supply and demand again. It's really not that complicated.