- Oct 12, 2009
- 58,613
- 10,629
- 2,030
Aren't we already above 3 meters of sea level?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not one legit study makes that claim. Try again mammy.
Don't you ever get tired of being completely wrong on every topic every time? Apparently not, because you always want come back again to be even more wrong.
http://www.atm.damtp.cam.ac.uk/mcintyre/shakun-co2-temp-lag-nat12.pdf
Global warming preceded by increasing carbon dioxide concentrations during the last deglaciation
Shakun et al (2012)
---
Here we construct a record of global surface temperature from 80 proxy records and show that temperature is correlated with and generally lags CO2 during the last (that is, the most recent) deglaciation.
---
I'll summarize it for deniers, who make it a point of pride to refuse to read actual science.
CO2 was _not_ the initial little kick that started the deglaciation.
However, after the first little kick by something else, CO2 quickly took over as the primary driver.
Shakun has been shown to be crap many times over. I said LEGIT. Learn English clown girl.
By whom? Published in which peer reviewed journal? Link?
Shakun has been shown to be crap many times over. I said LEGIT. Learn English clown girl.
westwall said:Given to you many times over. Go find them again.
mamooth how are you coming along on fining how much we have to lower CO2 in order to Stop the seas from rising?
mamooth how are you coming along on fining how much we have to lower CO2 in order to Stop the seas from rising?
Moonglow could still make fart bubbles in Morse code to give weather reports that glow in the moonlight.I doubt I live to see it...
of course you will not see it-------you behind will be under water
And a different odor for each weather system....But what I don't get is, why did lightbulbs dramatically increase in price over future shore erosion?Moonglow could still make fart bubbles in Morse code to give weather reports that glow in the moonlight.I doubt I live to see it...
of course you will not see it-------you behind will be under water
What will they see?Well, my one year old grandson will see it. And his children and grandchildren.
What will they see?Well, my one year old grandson will see it. And his children and grandchildren.
Whats fascinating is.........alarmists have been throwing bombs like this for over 20 years...........and where has it gotten them? But they keep doing it........
Meanwhile, President Trump is dismissing alarmists off scientific panels in the EPA left and right. Whats not to get that youre doing it wrong if you're an alarmist? The fascist approach to science is failing spectacularly in the real world.
Whats fascinating is.........alarmists have been throwing bombs like this for over 20 years...........and where has it gotten them? But they keep doing it........
Meanwhile, President Trump is dismissing alarmists off scientific panels in the EPA left and right. Whats not to get that youre doing it wrong if you're an alarmist? The fascist approach to science is failing spectacularly in the real world.
Its managed to make many of these phonies rich, like ManBearPig, for one. There's big bucks in climate alarmism.
Whats fascinating is.........alarmists have been throwing bombs like this for over 20 years...........and where has it gotten them? But they keep doing it........
Meanwhile, President Trump is dismissing alarmists off scientific panels in the EPA left and right. Whats not to get that youre doing it wrong if you're an alarmist? The fascist approach to science is failing spectacularly in the real world.
Its managed to make many of these phonies rich, like ManBearPig, for one. There's big bucks in climate alarmism.
A polar shift could very well do it.Something really bad is going to have to happen to get to 3+ meters by 2100.
We're 3.4mm per year at the current rate (1 meter = 1,000 mm and we're talking 3 meters so 3,000 mm)
3,000mm/3.4mm/year =882 years at current rate
How fast would sea level have to raise for this to occur? 2100-2017=83 years
So to get 3 more meters of sea levels within the next 83 years we'd have to 3,000mm/83 years = 36mm or .036M per year if linear. This is 1.4 inches per year of global sea level rise!
Seeing it is likely to be experiential in nature means you get the point that something seriously fucked would need to happen.
Interesting post, though none of it relates to AGW.Studying the sea level rise in the rapid warm up that started this interglacial, we see many times that there was a pause in the sea level rise, and at other times, as much as 3 feet of rise in a decade.
The behavior of this ancient ice sheet—called Laurentide—has puzzled scientists for decades because its periods of melting and splintering into the sea occurred at the coldest times in the last Ice Age. Ice should melt when the weather is warm, but that's not what happened.
"We've shown that we don't really need atmospheric warming to trigger large-scale disintegration events if the ocean warms up and starts tickling the edges of the ice sheets," said Jeremy Bassis, U-M associate professor of climate and space sciences and engineering. "It is possible that modern-day glaciers, not just the parts that are floating but the parts that are just touching the ocean, are more sensitive to ocean warming than we previously thought."
This mechanism is likely at work today on the Greenland ice sheet and possibly Antarctica. Scientists know this in part due to Bassis' previous work. Several years ago, he came up with a new, more accurate way to mathematically describe how ice breaks and flows. His model has led to a deeper understanding of how the Earth's store of ice could react to changes in air or ocean temperatures, and how that might translate to sea level rise.
Last year, other researchers used it to predict that melting Antarctic ice could raise sea levels by more than three feet, as opposed to the previous estimate that Antarctica would only contribute centimeters by 2100.
In the new study, Bassis and his colleagues applied a version of this model to the climate of the last Ice Age, which ended about 10,000 years ago. They used ice core and ocean-floor sediment records to estimate water temperature and how it varied. Their aim was to see if what's happening in Greenland today could describe the behavior of the Laurentide Ice Sheet.
How an Ice Age paradox could inform sea level rise predictions | University of Michigan News