based on OAN say so, which really, is no better than the say so of CNN, MSNBC, WaPo or the NYT
I'd disagree. CNN, et al. all have long proven records of fake news, spin and lying. OAN does not to my knowledge.
. . of course you would disagree.
Honestly, given their history, I would probably trust OANN more than CNN, MSNBC, WaPo, and the NYT. . . not sure about WSJ though. I find the funding behind OANN suspect, just like WSJ.
When you don't even make an attempt to hide your bias? meh.
en.wikipedia.org
I am just making the point, that if the thread is going to be in CDZ, instead of politics, the podcast should tell it's viewers the sources used and make it easy for us, or the OP should supply the links.
I debated for three years in high-school, and two years on a Big Ten debate squad, the affirmative has the burden of proof.
Most intelligent folks know, OANN has a conservative bias, so they will necessarily present evidence for their case with a bias, thus, the evidence should be open to examination by those who want to have. . ."A CLEAN DEBATE."
The founder of One America News Network, set to be unveiled at CPAC today, talks to David Freedlander.
www.thedailybeast.com
The San Diego family behind niche cable channel WealthTV is partnering with the Washington Times to launch a 24-hour conservative-leaning cable news network.
www.wsj.com