Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You said, "You don’t know shit about modern vaccines which use evolutionary related constructs to alter the immune system,"Not all medicines use evolution related attributes to develope. VACCINES DO . But, all medicines approved by the FDA are tested not to affect you or the child of a oregnan5 woman. If it does , there are warnings. Evolution is dependent upon the dna passed from one
generation to another.
You're being silly. And you don't know the science. There is no such thing as "nothing". Nothing doesn't exist, it's a figment of your imagination.Could you create an eyeball out of nothing? Have you ever seen nothing create anything? Silly boy.
Then why are you asking me ? It has the same function in almost all living organisms.,I know what DNA or RNA does in vaccines.
You fabricated a god out of nothing.Could you create an eyeball out of nothing? Have you ever seen nothing create anything? Silly boy.
Your faith that no God exists is stellar.You fabricated a god out of nothing.
Many groups say they have created different ones, but there is no Evidence any has.
`
I said there was "No evidence." That's a Fact, Not Faith.Your faith that no God exists is stellar.
You have faith that there's no evidence. But the evidence surrounds you.I said there was "No evidence." That's a Fact, Not Faith.
`
You have faith that there's no evidence. But the evidence surrounds you.
When you look at a Corvette engine ... it's clear that all the intricate parts and the manner in which they go together are designed. They didn't fall into place by accident. So we all agree that a Corvette is the product of an intelligent mind and an intelligent designer. Far more intricate than a Corvette engine is the human eye. I'll let you draw your own conclusion. If you're not able to see that such a design is a product of an intelligent Designer, then you're probably never going to accept the "evidence" of Intelligent Design.What you call 'Evidence' is FAITH and could also be called 'a rock.' (or a 'hill' or a 'green bean')
LOL
There is No Evidence of your god that couldn't be claimed as Evidence of ANYTHING else or ANY OTHER God.
`
You seem to be avoiding the point that the number of scientists who accept evolutionary theory absolutely dwarfs the number who actually reject it.Moderator tells me I must edit the opening post but provides no link or method by which I can edit it as requested. Let's cooperate, shall we? The thoughts of pages and pages of scientists confirm my observations and scientific opinions. That should be glaringly obvious.
How primitive Darwinists can cling to "A>B>C>D" nonsense prattled by bitter atheists like Richard Dawkins escapes me. He can't even have his ugly teeth fixed with all his millions earned by selling books full of lies.
The fossil record shows the clear evolutionary development of the eye. The same is true for every ID argument I have ever read.When you look at a Corvette engine ... it's clear that all the intricate parts and the manner in which they go together are designed. They didn't fall into place by accident. So we all agree that a Corvette is the product of an intelligent mind and an intelligent designer. Far more intricate than a Corvette engine is the human eye. I'll let you draw your own conclusion. If you're not able to see that such a design is a product of an intelligent Designer, then you're probably never going to accept the "evidence" of Intelligent Design.
Show me a fossil of an eye. Your opinion is FAR from fact. You'll have to do better. Pictures please.The fossil record shows the clear evolutionary development of the eye. The same is true for every ID argument I have ever read.
The number of wolves who want to eat a sheep far outpaces the number of wolves who don't.You seem to be avoiding the point that the number of scientists who accept evolutionary theory absolutely dwarfs the number who actually reject it.
When you look at a Corvette engine ... it's clear that all the intricate parts and the manner in which they go together are designed. They didn't fall into place by accident. So we all agree that a Corvette is the product of an intelligent mind and an intelligent designer. Far more intricate than a Corvette engine is the human eye. I'll let you draw your own conclusion. If you're not able to see that such a design is a product of an intelligent Designer, then you're probably never going to accept the "evidence" of Intelligent Design.
First, Eye is soft Tissue. Fossils are for the most part Bone or Bone impression that survive.Show me a fossil of an eye. Your opinion is FAR from fact. You'll have to do better. Pictures please.
Show me a fossil of an eye. Your opinion is FAR from fact. You'll have to do better. Pictures please.
I appreciate your cut and paste, but Wikipedia is as trustworthy as Biden is. That's why I never use it as a reference. The Bible has been around a lot longer and has been a bestseller for centuries. I think I'll stick with something more tried and true.Junkyard tornado
The junkyard tornado, also known as Hoyle's Fallacy, is an argument used to deride the probability of abiogenesis as comparable to "the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747."[1][2][3] It was used originally by English astronomer Fred Hoyle (1915–2001), who applied statistical analysis to the origin of life, but similar observations predate Hoyle and have been found all the way back to Darwin's time,[1] and indeed to Cicero in classical times.[4] While Hoyle himself was an atheist, the argument has since become a mainstay in the rejection of evolution by religious groups.
This argument is rejected by the vast majority of biologists.
From the modern evolutionary standpoint, while the odds of the sudden construction of higher lifeforms are indeed improbably remote, evolution proceeds in many smaller stages, each driven by natural selection rather than by chance, over a long period of time.
The transition as a whole is plausible, as each step improves survivability; the Boeing 747 was not designed in a single unlikely burst of creativity, just as modern lifeforms were not constructed in one single unlikely event, as the junkyard tornado posits."..."
Junkyard tornado - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
`
You 100% Trust a 1700 yr old Cherry-picked ALTERED FABLE/four from of scores of Gospels (that don't even mention dinosaurs) but you don't like heavily Footnoted (with Scientific studies) Wikipedia?I appreciate your cut and paste, but Wikipedia is as trustworthy as Biden is. That's why I never use it as a reference. The Bible has been around a lot longer and has been a bestseller for centuries. I think I'll stick with something more tried and true.
Yes! I 100% trust God's Word which is timeless since He's timeless.You 100% Trust a 1700 yr old Cherry-picked ALTERED FABLE/four from of scores of Gospels (that don't even mention dinosaurs) but you don't like heavily Footnoted (with Scientific studies) Wikipedia?
Genesis doesn't even have Kweation or it's order right.
You're an Incurable member of the Planets biggest CULT which has NO EVIDENCE from Any source.
You lost at every Turn/Every part of this debate you Putrid Pilgrim.
Smart, less doctrinaire believers (80+ IQ) Understand you Cannot prove or even Hard Evidence a god, and that their belief is FAITH. So that there can't be any winning that debate.
So they are satisfied with that thought.
You are just plain Indoctrinated and Stupid.
`
There is NO "god" in evidence.Yes! I 100% trust God's Word which is timeless since He's timeless.
"In your opinion"Have you heard of cause and effect. For every effect ... there was a cause. But there can be only ONE first cause. The first cause was uncaused else it would not be the first cause but, rather, the second cause. So the first cause is eternal. The first Cause, in my opinion, is God (our Intelligent Designer).
