2020 Electoral College Map. Jan 2019.

StatesPoll

Member
Dec 27, 2015
41
7
21

Details: StatesPoll,com on Twitter


Dv5zvBEW0AAcofw.jpg
 
Mi is not tilting to the R, we will vote Dem. Florida , if we can stop the Republicans from cheating Fl will be Dem area.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
Mi is not tilting to the R, we will vote Dem. Florida , if we can stop the Republicans from cheating Fl will be Dem area.

Despite of White Evangelical's low turnouts.
Preisdential Election 2016, Michigan: White Evan vote share 27%.
MI Sen 2018: White Evan vote share 19%.

John James(R) got 45.8%.

White Evans in MI
2016: 27% Share, Trump 81% / Clinton 14%
2018: 19% Share, James 69% / Stabenow 30%

I guess 2020 White Evan's turnouts and % might be similar as 2016.

https://www.foxnews.com/midterms-2018/voter-analysis?filter=MI&type=S

2016 election results: Michigan Exit polls
 
Last edited:
We got 3 women, SOS Dem women first since 95, AG first Dem women since 2001, and Gov a dem women. We have a republican Senate since 1984.

The UP votes Rep, even though many are on the ACA and Medicaid, and we won't have Hillary to run against Trump, which will be a huge factor. We will be vote Dem. The new SOS will open up Secretary of States offices that the Republicans closed.

Florida is very close. WI went Democratic.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6


Despite of White Evangelical's low turnouts.
Preisdential Election 2016, Wisconsin: White Evan vote share 28%.
WI Gov 2018: White Evan vote share 16%.

Evers 49.5% / Walker 48.4%.

White Evans in WI
2016: 28% Share, Trump 73% / Clinton 23%
2018: 16% Share, Walker(R) 80% / Evers(D) 20%

I guess 2020 Wisconsin White Evan's turnouts and % might be similar as 2016.

D +1.1% with very very low turnouts of White Evan.
Imagine normal White Evan turnouts in 2020.

Voter Analysis - Fox News Midterms 2018 America's Election HQ

2016 election results: Wisconsin Exit polls
 


Despite of White Evangelical's low turnouts.
Preisdential Election 2016, Wisconsin: White Evan vote share 28%.
WI Gov 2018: White Evan vote share 16%.

Evers 49.5% / Walker 48.4%.

White Evans in WI
2016: 28% Share, Trump 73% / Clinton 23%
2018: 16% Share, Walker(R) 80% / Evers(D) 20%

I guess 2020 Wisconsin White Evan's turnouts and % might be similar as 2016.

Voter Analysis - Fox News Midterms 2018 America's Election HQ

2016 election results: Wisconsin Exit polls
I love it when people who don’t believe polls point to them
 


Despite of White Evangelical's low turnouts.
Preisdential Election 2016, Wisconsin: White Evan vote share 28%.
WI Gov 2018: White Evan vote share 16%.

Evers 49.5% / Walker 48.4%.

White Evans in WI
2016: 28% Share, Trump 73% / Clinton 23%
2018: 16% Share, Walker(R) 80% / Evers(D) 20%

I guess 2020 Wisconsin White Evan's turnouts and % might be similar as 2016.

Voter Analysis - Fox News Midterms 2018 America's Election HQ

2016 election results: Wisconsin Exit polls
I love it when people who don’t believe polls point to them
Really? Do you have a quote from THIS poster stating that they don't believe in polls?
 


Despite of White Evangelical's low turnouts.
Preisdential Election 2016, Wisconsin: White Evan vote share 28%.
WI Gov 2018: White Evan vote share 16%.

Evers 49.5% / Walker 48.4%.

White Evans in WI
2016: 28% Share, Trump 73% / Clinton 23%
2018: 16% Share, Walker(R) 80% / Evers(D) 20%

I guess 2020 Wisconsin White Evan's turnouts and % might be similar as 2016.

Voter Analysis - Fox News Midterms 2018 America's Election HQ

2016 election results: Wisconsin Exit polls
I love it when people who don’t believe polls point to them
Really? Do you have a quote from THIS poster stating that they don't believe in polls?
Stfu idiot.
 


Despite of White Evangelical's low turnouts.
Preisdential Election 2016, Wisconsin: White Evan vote share 28%.
WI Gov 2018: White Evan vote share 16%.

Evers 49.5% / Walker 48.4%.

White Evans in WI
2016: 28% Share, Trump 73% / Clinton 23%
2018: 16% Share, Walker(R) 80% / Evers(D) 20%

I guess 2020 Wisconsin White Evan's turnouts and % might be similar as 2016.

Voter Analysis - Fox News Midterms 2018 America's Election HQ

2016 election results: Wisconsin Exit polls
I love it when people who don’t believe polls point to them
Really? Do you have a quote from THIS poster stating that they don't believe in polls?
Stfu idiot.
So that would be a no. Got it.

Now, stfu.
 
If the dems put up one of their usual "can't vote for" candidates, the above map should be fairly close. If the dems put up a "reasonably good" candidate, then all bets are off.
 
Voter Analysis - Fox News Midterms 2018 America's Election HQ

I see John James didn't get any votes from Hispanics or Blacks. Must be the Trump effect, or that Debbie S. is doing an excellent job. White evans voted for him. You know up in the UP there are no blacks and in northern Mi or rural areas, and Grand Rapids goes Republican. Trump in Eaton Rapids, mainly white area, said "What have you got to loose, addressing blacks.

Hopefully we will got with Warren or Beto. Warren can ask Trump why he didn't give a million bucks to charity of her choice.
 

This is based largely on a 2 year old exit poll and a Fox News voter analysis?

Can you spell 'biased'?

Means little/nothing.

And considering the pasting the Reps took in the House last November...it also seems HIGHLY unlikely.

White Evangelicals are inelastic(support % and turnouts both) in a Presidential Year.
White Evan's support % and turnouts might be a smilar with 2016, very likely
 
Darkwind said:
A freakishly stupid bed wetting parasite said:
Exactly what it was programmed to repeat whenever someone it hates posts a poll.
Really? Do you have a quote from THIS poster stating that they don't believe in polls?

When certain "news" apparatchiks use "polling data" that was manipulated in the first place, in order to influence public opinion no one should be surprised when the results are flawed and the pollsters lose credibility.

When people post polls that defy the leftist narrative, then all of a sudden the posters become less credible?

That's not quite how credibility works, not that truth or facts ever caused a synapse to function in whatever sphincter regressive marxist pukes use for a "mind".

.
 

This is based largely on a 2 year old exit poll and a Fox News voter analysis?

Can you spell 'biased'?

Means little/nothing.

And considering the pasting the Reps took in the House last November...it also seems HIGHLY unlikely.

Don't do your touchdown dance too soon:
1. The president's party ALWAYS loses seats in the mid-terms
2. 40 GOP incumbents bailed, which is unusually high
3. The courts helped the dems gerrymander (or un-gerrymander) seats
4. The GOP picked up 2 seats in the Senate, so there was no "wave"
5. If tradition/history holds, Trump will win re-election in 2020
 
We do have an issue in Fl, since the SOS is elected by the Gov and he skated in by the skin of his teeth, we have a Republican problem.

I expect another recount, its the only way they can win.
 
He won’t win PA MI or WI again


Despite of White Evangelical's low turnouts.
Preisdential Election 2016, Wisconsin: White Evan vote share 28%.
WI Gov 2018: White Evan vote share 16%.

Evers 49.5% / Walker 48.4%.

White Evans in WI
2016: 28% Share, Trump 73% / Clinton 23%
2018: 16% Share, Walker(R) 80% / Evers(D) 20%

I guess 2020 Wisconsin White Evan's turnouts and % might be similar as 2016.

Voter Analysis - Fox News Midterms 2018 America's Election HQ

2016 election results: Wisconsin Exit polls
I love it when people who don’t believe polls point to them
Really? Do you have a quote from THIS poster stating that they don't believe in polls?
Stfu idiot.
So that would be a no. Got it.

Now, stfu.

Beotch!

 
Darkwind said:
A freakishly stupid bed wetting parasite said:
Exactly what it was programmed to repeat whenever someone it hates posts a poll.
Really? Do you have a quote from THIS poster stating that they don't believe in polls?

When certain "news" apparatchiks use "polling data" that was manipulated in the first place, in order to influence public opinion no one should be surprised when the results are flawed and the pollsters lose credibility.

When people post polls that defy the leftist narrative, then all of a sudden the posters become less credible?

That's not quite how credibility works, not that truth or facts ever caused a synapse to function in whatever sphincter regressive marxist pukes use for a "mind".

.
Sure, but I wasn't addressing that. I was addressing the thread deflection that the OP didn't believe in polls. Since there is no credible proof that the OP has ever stated that he/she does not believe in polls, then the reply was nothing but a pure troll.

Truthfully, it is far too early for any data of this kind to have any real meaning. I wouldn't believe it regardless as I AM on record as not believing a poll is anything other than information used to manipulate public opinion.
 

Forum List

Back
Top