Based on everything I've seen? Not a chance. He'd have to rip off 2 more championships and then you may have an argument, but still we will probably disagree. If you weren't old enough to see Jordan, its a shame. The only one that was Jordan before Jordan was Dr. J. A highlight real. Athletic like Jordan, but not a 6 time champ. One word to describe Jordan. Winner. Now Kobe has the rings, but what did it take? Shaq? One of the greatest centers of all time? And it took them years to figure it out. So Kobe just isn't as impressive as Jordan was. But damn close. No shame in Kobe's game. And I give him props for doing it without Shaq. I'm definately a fan.
Jordan was over-rated. The most dominant force the NBA has ever seen was Wilt Chamberlain. The greatest winner was Bill Russell. Jordan's teams would've lost to:
- '67 Philidelphia Warriors
- '70 New York Knicks
- '71 Milwalkee Bucks
- '72 Lakers
- '77 Portland Trailblazers
- '85 Lakers
- '86 Celtics
- '87 Lakers
All those Bull's teams had one fatal flaw, a dominant player at the 5 spot. You do not answer a Russell, Chamberlain or Jabbar, with a Perdue or Cartwright. Any championship team with a hall of fame center would've ate their lunch.
Agreed. An easy tell is that if Jordan was that dominant he would have been winning 50 games and not having losing seasons before Pippen got there. Jordan jockers will whine, but he was just getting started. Yea? He took his team from 27 wins to 39 wins? Bird took his team from 29 wins to 60 and a conference final.
And yea, the 90's was pretty watered down for a team with no good 5 to be winning that much. And a team like the 86 C's or 87 Lakers would likely sweep the Bulls (especially if it was reff'd by 70's standards in which it wasn't ***** ball.)