2012 NBA Playoffs

Based on everything I've seen? Not a chance. He'd have to rip off 2 more championships and then you may have an argument, but still we will probably disagree. If you weren't old enough to see Jordan, its a shame. The only one that was Jordan before Jordan was Dr. J. A highlight real. Athletic like Jordan, but not a 6 time champ. One word to describe Jordan. Winner. Now Kobe has the rings, but what did it take? Shaq? One of the greatest centers of all time? And it took them years to figure it out. So Kobe just isn't as impressive as Jordan was. But damn close. No shame in Kobe's game. And I give him props for doing it without Shaq. I'm definately a fan.
Jordan was over-rated. The most dominant force the NBA has ever seen was Wilt Chamberlain. The greatest winner was Bill Russell. Jordan's teams would've lost to:
  • '67 Philidelphia Warriors
  • '70 New York Knicks
  • '71 Milwalkee Bucks
  • '72 Lakers
  • '77 Portland Trailblazers
  • '85 Lakers
  • '86 Celtics
  • '87 Lakers
All those Bull's teams had one fatal flaw, a dominant player at the 5 spot. You do not answer a Russell, Chamberlain or Jabbar, with a Perdue or Cartwright. Any championship team with a hall of fame center would've ate their lunch.

Agreed. An easy tell is that if Jordan was that dominant he would have been winning 50 games and not having losing seasons before Pippen got there. Jordan jockers will whine, but he was just getting started. Yea? He took his team from 27 wins to 39 wins? Bird took his team from 29 wins to 60 and a conference final.

And yea, the 90's was pretty watered down for a team with no good 5 to be winning that much. And a team like the 86 C's or 87 Lakers would likely sweep the Bulls (especially if it was reff'd by 70's standards in which it wasn't ***** ball.)

Jordan had to deal with the Bad Boys. 10 great guys on that team. And they did knock Jordan on his ass. And before them Jordan had to deal with Bird. He was young. Cut him some slack. Jordan retired Bird, the Bad Boys and Magic Johnson. That's why he's the greatest.

I'm sure you would agree that Bird had a much better supporting cast than Jordan. Right? Or are you going to start being a Bulls jocker and compare that team to the Celtics? You can't have it both ways now. So you are either admitting that Bird had a better team or you are comparing the Bulls to what you consider one of the greatest teams of all time? And that's why Jordan is the greatest. He did it 6 times with an inferior team. Your words, not mine. :eusa_whistle:

And come on. Until he got Pippen? Like Pippen is that great? Wade got LeBron and how has that worked out? Jordan did it with average centers at best. Role players. And he won 6 championships. Bird? So with a better team, Bird won less? Interesting.

P.S. I think the Jordan, Pippen and Rodman team is one of the best all time. Didn't they win the most games? Rodman was great. Is he in the Hall of Fame yet? I know he's broke.
 
Jordan was over-rated. The most dominant force the NBA has ever seen was Wilt Chamberlain. The greatest winner was Bill Russell. Jordan's teams would've lost to:
  • '67 Philidelphia Warriors
  • '70 New York Knicks
  • '71 Milwalkee Bucks
  • '72 Lakers
  • '77 Portland Trailblazers
  • '85 Lakers
  • '86 Celtics
  • '87 Lakers
All those Bull's teams had one fatal flaw, a dominant player at the 5 spot. You do not answer a Russell, Chamberlain or Jabbar, with a Perdue or Cartwright. Any championship team with a hall of fame center would've ate their lunch.

Agreed. An easy tell is that if Jordan was that dominant he would have been winning 50 games and not having losing seasons before Pippen got there. Jordan jockers will whine, but he was just getting started. Yea? He took his team from 27 wins to 39 wins? Bird took his team from 29 wins to 60 and a conference final.

And yea, the 90's was pretty watered down for a team with no good 5 to be winning that much. And a team like the 86 C's or 87 Lakers would likely sweep the Bulls (especially if it was reff'd by 70's standards in which it wasn't ***** ball.)

Jordan had to deal with the Bad Boys. 10 great guys on that team. And they did knock Jordan on his ass. And before them Jordan had to deal with Bird. He was young. Cut him some slack. Jordan retired Bird, the Bad Boys and Magic Johnson. That's why he's the greatest.

I'm sure you would agree that Bird had a much better supporting cast than Jordan. Right? Or are you going to start being a Bulls jocker and compare that team to the Celtics? You can't have it both ways now. So you are either admitting that Bird had a better team or you are comparing the Bulls to what you consider one of the greatest teams of all time? And that's why Jordan is the greatest. He did it 6 times with an inferior team. Your words, not mine. :eusa_whistle:

And come on. Until he got Pippen? Like Pippen is that great? Wade got LeBron and how has that worked out? Jordan did it with average centers at best. Role players. And he won 6 championships. Bird? So with a better team, Bird won less? Interesting.

P.S. I think the Jordan, Pippen and Rodman team is one of the best all time. Didn't they win the most games? Rodman was great. Is he in the Hall of Fame yet? I know he's broke.

I wouldn't agree with that nonsense at all. Jordan didn't retire the 80's stars. Age and injury did. That is pretty clear. And they wiped the floor with him in their prime.

What Jordan did do is beat the 80's B stars in the watered down 90s in a league in which Stern couldn't do enough to give Jordan every advantage (cough: push off on Russell).

Jordan was zero for five in actually even having a winning season without Pippen. How can you possibly so easily ignore that reality? Like another poster said, he was the third best player on his own college team. When he retired the first time, the Bulls didn't lose much.

Bird beat him 14 times in a row. If Dirk beat Durant 14 straight times or LBJ beat Kobe 14 straight times or KG beat Duncan 14 straight times; we wouldn't be calling out Durant, Kobe or Duncan as the greatest most likely.

Yes, of course Bird had a better team when he did it. That's not the point. The point is that if Jordan was so great he wouldn't have got his ass swept twice. He wouldn't have put up a donut in the 4th quarter while Bird was busting 15 in his eye with McHale out on his own home court. He wouldn't have choked in the Game 4 at home of the 1989 ECF against the Pistions, up 2-1 at home!

And why were Bird's teams so great? You can point to talent; but how misguided is that. He never played with a great athlete like a Pippen or even a Worthy. When he was finally going to get a chance with Bias, the dude died. He won, because he was out there playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers. He won because he was arguably the greatest shooter of all-time to boot.

Jordan was a unique talent. I'll give him that. And he did some things on the court better than anyone probably ever has. But you have to keep it in perspective. Basketball is still a team sport and it's not athleticism only. It still comes down to a comprehensive skill set.

And it's not a a matter of simply admitting that either Bird was better or his team was better b/c the Bulls were inferior to prior teams. It's a matter of understanding the eras. You have no idea how much expansion diluted the talent as it was already on the down hill. Look at league scoring by year to see. At one point, Stern was so desperate that he moved the three point line in. And to the end, watch yt vids of Jordan in the three point contest vs. Bird in the three point contest and you'll see the crazy difference in their shots.

You have to understand just how much better the 80's were than the 90's. There were four, maybe five teams that I would rank better than the Bulls. The Celtics and Lakers of course. But an equally worthy team is the Sixers who had went to a couple championships in the late seventies and went to a few more in the early 80's. Bird literally had to compete against two "dynasty" quality teams. People forget that the Sixers went 10 deep and their bench was about as good as their starters. And in a three or four year span there, Moses Malone and Dr. J won all the MVPs.

Then the Twin Tower Rockets were good for a few years there; but certainly not as good for as long as the Bulls. And the Bad Boys; I mean really the mid 80's to late 80's Bad Boys pretty much have it on the Bulls too.

It's simply idiotic to take a simple minded approach by ring counting or all of the sudden Robert Horry is great at 7 rings or Bill Russell is greatest by far at 11 rings. You have to look at all the details.
 
Last edited:
Wilt averaged less than 30 head to head vs. Russell in 142 match-ups. I'd say that Russell contained him just fine.
That was an average. Wilt scored 62 points on Russell and had 6 other games over 50 points. He also averaged almost 30 rebounds a game against Russell and he set the single game rebound record of 55 against Russell.

Wilt and Russell played against each other 142 times in 10 years. Russell's team won 88, Wilt's teams won 74. (14 game difference)

In those games Wilt averaged 28.7 ppg and 28.7 rpg, Russell averaged 14.5ppg and 23.7rpg

Wilt's high game vs. Russell was 62, and he had six other 50+ point games against Russell . Russell's high game against Wilt was 37, and he had only two other 30+ point games against Wilt.

Wilt's record 55 rebound game was against Russell, and he had six other 40+ rebound games vs. Bill.
Russell only had one 40+ rebound night against Wilt.
As you can see, Wilt had his way with Russell.

Rebounds from the olden days is an over-rated stat. There was a lot more misses b/c of the ball and FG percent was down.

And yes, Wilt had one 60 plus game in 142 tries against Russell. Good for him. He was still contained. He still averaged less than 30. He still lost every time to Russell when it counted.

And frankly, when he had Elgin Baylor and Jerry West (The Logo) as your teammates, then I don't know exactly how much stock I'd put in the teammate argument. The C's just understood what it took to win.
 
I wonder if it's them or Philly just didn't show up tonight...I'm not able to watch it, but they played the Celts hard the first two. After the season Boston had I really can't believe they are where they are now.
It won't last. They're old and not going anywhere.

Whos going to stop them in the East? Miami without Bosh is very vulnerable, if Boston keeps their shit together they have a shot to make it to the Finals.
 
I wonder if it's them or Philly just didn't show up tonight...I'm not able to watch it, but they played the Celts hard the first two. After the season Boston had I really can't believe they are where they are now.
It won't last. They're old and not going anywhere.

Whos going to stop them in the East? Miami without Bosh is very vulnerable, if Boston keeps their shit together they have a shot to make it to the Finals.

Feeling better today, bro?

I told you about game 3.....
 
Boston is destroying the 76ers tonight.

It's a shame that they screwed around in Boston. They could be going for a sweep on Philly's home court and then get needed rest.

That would have been the ideal situation, because Chris Bosh is gone the Heat/Pacers series is going to be alot closer than they would like, I don't know if the Pacers can win but they can definently make life very difficult for the Heat, Miami has absolutely no one that can play against David West or Roy Hibbert right now.
 
It won't last. They're old and not going anywhere.

Whos going to stop them in the East? Miami without Bosh is very vulnerable, if Boston keeps their shit together they have a shot to make it to the Finals.

Feeling better today, bro?

I told you about game 3.....

I feel MUCH better, I would like to see us take care of business on Friday also. I don't want to breath life back into the Sixers.
 
The Lakers are in some serious shit now against the Thunder, they have to win the next 2 in LA to have a shot.
 
I wonder if it's them or Philly just didn't show up tonight...I'm not able to watch it, but they played the Celts hard the first two. After the season Boston had I really can't believe they are where they are now.
It won't last. They're old and not going anywhere.

Whens the last time a young team won the championship?
 
Agreed. An easy tell is that if Jordan was that dominant he would have been winning 50 games and not having losing seasons before Pippen got there. Jordan jockers will whine, but he was just getting started. Yea? He took his team from 27 wins to 39 wins? Bird took his team from 29 wins to 60 and a conference final.

And yea, the 90's was pretty watered down for a team with no good 5 to be winning that much. And a team like the 86 C's or 87 Lakers would likely sweep the Bulls (especially if it was reff'd by 70's standards in which it wasn't ***** ball.)

Jordan had to deal with the Bad Boys. 10 great guys on that team. And they did knock Jordan on his ass. And before them Jordan had to deal with Bird. He was young. Cut him some slack. Jordan retired Bird, the Bad Boys and Magic Johnson. That's why he's the greatest.

I'm sure you would agree that Bird had a much better supporting cast than Jordan. Right? Or are you going to start being a Bulls jocker and compare that team to the Celtics? You can't have it both ways now. So you are either admitting that Bird had a better team or you are comparing the Bulls to what you consider one of the greatest teams of all time? And that's why Jordan is the greatest. He did it 6 times with an inferior team. Your words, not mine. :eusa_whistle:

And come on. Until he got Pippen? Like Pippen is that great? Wade got LeBron and how has that worked out? Jordan did it with average centers at best. Role players. And he won 6 championships. Bird? So with a better team, Bird won less? Interesting.

P.S. I think the Jordan, Pippen and Rodman team is one of the best all time. Didn't they win the most games? Rodman was great. Is he in the Hall of Fame yet? I know he's broke.

I wouldn't agree with that nonsense at all. Jordan didn't retire the 80's stars. Age and injury did. That is pretty clear. And they wiped the floor with him in their prime.

What Jordan did do is beat the 80's B stars in the watered down 90s in a league in which Stern couldn't do enough to give Jordan every advantage (cough: push off on Russell).

Jordan was zero for five in actually even having a winning season without Pippen. How can you possibly so easily ignore that reality? Like another poster said, he was the third best player on his own college team. When he retired the first time, the Bulls didn't lose much.

Bird beat him 14 times in a row. If Dirk beat Durant 14 straight times or LBJ beat Kobe 14 straight times or KG beat Duncan 14 straight times; we wouldn't be calling out Durant, Kobe or Duncan as the greatest most likely.

Yes, of course Bird had a better team when he did it. That's not the point. The point is that if Jordan was so great he wouldn't have got his ass swept twice. He wouldn't have put up a donut in the 4th quarter while Bird was busting 15 in his eye with McHale out on his own home court. He wouldn't have choked in the Game 4 at home of the 1989 ECF against the Pistions, up 2-1 at home!

And why were Bird's teams so great? You can point to talent; but how misguided is that. He never played with a great athlete like a Pippen or even a Worthy. When he was finally going to get a chance with Bias, the dude died. He won, because he was out there playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers. He won because he was arguably the greatest shooter of all-time to boot.

Jordan was a unique talent. I'll give him that. And he did some things on the court better than anyone probably ever has. But you have to keep it in perspective. Basketball is still a team sport and it's not athleticism only. It still comes down to a comprehensive skill set.

And it's not a a matter of simply admitting that either Bird was better or his team was better b/c the Bulls were inferior to prior teams. It's a matter of understanding the eras. You have no idea how much expansion diluted the talent as it was already on the down hill. Look at league scoring by year to see. At one point, Stern was so desperate that he moved the three point line in. And to the end, watch yt vids of Jordan in the three point contest vs. Bird in the three point contest and you'll see the crazy difference in their shots.

You have to understand just how much better the 80's were than the 90's. There were four, maybe five teams that I would rank better than the Bulls. The Celtics and Lakers of course. But an equally worthy team is the Sixers who had went to a couple championships in the late seventies and went to a few more in the early 80's. Bird literally had to compete against two "dynasty" quality teams. People forget that the Sixers went 10 deep and their bench was about as good as their starters. And in a three or four year span there, Moses Malone and Dr. J won all the MVPs.

Then the Twin Tower Rockets were good for a few years there; but certainly not as good for as long as the Bulls. And the Bad Boys; I mean really the mid 80's to late 80's Bad Boys pretty much have it on the Bulls too.

It's simply idiotic to take a simple minded approach by ring counting or all of the sudden Robert Horry is great at 7 rings or Bill Russell is greatest by far at 11 rings. You have to look at all the details.

You make a lot of great points. Can't say you are wrong. But just some things to consider. Jordan clearly peaked when he won his first 3 championships, took a break, and then came back and still owned the sport. He wasn't the same guy who lost to the Celtics, Pistons or Lakers. Not the same guy that played in college. Do you know why I was such a great wrestler my senior year? Because I got beat up my Sophomore and Junior years by Seniors. Who knows who would beat who if we were both seniors. Typically we always think the older kid was better but that's only because he beat up on the younger one for 3 years. Hard to get that out of our memory. I often wonder if I was as good as B. Blair. He was a beast! But so was I. But I think if I met him today I would still be intimidated by him. I hate younger kids who run into me and suggest they could have beat me if we were both seniors. Disrespectful to their elders I say. I never do that to older guys. I go by who did better at the State tournament. Doesn't matter if my competition was better than yours. I took 5th and I know guys who wrestled at really low weight classes but they placed higher than me. So I bow to them, even though they were at ***** weight classes. :eusa_shhh:

Jordan is still the best. Sorry. Who do you think is the best?

I'll even give you that the league was watered down when Jordan won, but he still owned it. No one else came close during his time. Ewing, Reggie Miller, Karl Malone, Mourning. They all tried but couldn't come close.
 
Agreed. An easy tell is that if Jordan was that dominant he would have been winning 50 games and not having losing seasons before Pippen got there. Jordan jockers will whine, but he was just getting started. Yea? He took his team from 27 wins to 39 wins? Bird took his team from 29 wins to 60 and a conference final.

And yea, the 90's was pretty watered down for a team with no good 5 to be winning that much. And a team like the 86 C's or 87 Lakers would likely sweep the Bulls (especially if it was reff'd by 70's standards in which it wasn't ***** ball.)

Jordan had to deal with the Bad Boys. 10 great guys on that team. And they did knock Jordan on his ass. And before them Jordan had to deal with Bird. He was young. Cut him some slack. Jordan retired Bird, the Bad Boys and Magic Johnson. That's why he's the greatest.

I'm sure you would agree that Bird had a much better supporting cast than Jordan. Right? Or are you going to start being a Bulls jocker and compare that team to the Celtics? You can't have it both ways now. So you are either admitting that Bird had a better team or you are comparing the Bulls to what you consider one of the greatest teams of all time? And that's why Jordan is the greatest. He did it 6 times with an inferior team. Your words, not mine. :eusa_whistle:

And come on. Until he got Pippen? Like Pippen is that great? Wade got LeBron and how has that worked out? Jordan did it with average centers at best. Role players. And he won 6 championships. Bird? So with a better team, Bird won less? Interesting.

P.S. I think the Jordan, Pippen and Rodman team is one of the best all time. Didn't they win the most games? Rodman was great. Is he in the Hall of Fame yet? I know he's broke.

Jordan was zero for five in actually even having a winning season without Pippen. How can you possibly so easily ignore that reality? Like another poster said, he was the third best player on his own college team. When he retired the first time, the Bulls didn't lose much.

.

Pippen couldn't win wiht Barkley and Olajuwon?

And remember Pippen couldn't win with this?

Greg Anthony G 6-0
Stacey Augmon F-G 6-6
Erick Barkley G 6-1
Dale Davis F 6-11
Gary Grant G 6-3 185
Antonio Harvey F-C 6-11
Shawn Kemp F-C 6-10
Will Perdue C 7-0 240
Scottie Pippen
Arvydas Sabonis C 7-3 279
Detlef Schrempf F-C 6-9 214
Steve Smith G 6-7 200
Damon Stoudamire G 5-10 171
Rod Strickland G 6-3 175
Rasheed Wallace F-C
Bonzi Wells G-F
 
I say the biggest FAIL in NBA history is Kobe, Shaq, Payton, Malone. How did they not win?
 
I say the biggest FAIL in NBA history is Kobe, Shaq, Payton, Malone. How did they not win?

Well Gary Payton and Karl Malone were a shell of their former selves by the time they got to the Lakers, they were not the players they used to be. Hell Karl Malone barely even played in the Finals that year.
 
15th post
Jordan had to deal with the Bad Boys. 10 great guys on that team. And they did knock Jordan on his ass. And before them Jordan had to deal with Bird. He was young. Cut him some slack. Jordan retired Bird, the Bad Boys and Magic Johnson. That's why he's the greatest.

I'm sure you would agree that Bird had a much better supporting cast than Jordan. Right? Or are you going to start being a Bulls jocker and compare that team to the Celtics? You can't have it both ways now. So you are either admitting that Bird had a better team or you are comparing the Bulls to what you consider one of the greatest teams of all time? And that's why Jordan is the greatest. He did it 6 times with an inferior team. Your words, not mine. :eusa_whistle:

And come on. Until he got Pippen? Like Pippen is that great? Wade got LeBron and how has that worked out? Jordan did it with average centers at best. Role players. And he won 6 championships. Bird? So with a better team, Bird won less? Interesting.

P.S. I think the Jordan, Pippen and Rodman team is one of the best all time. Didn't they win the most games? Rodman was great. Is he in the Hall of Fame yet? I know he's broke.

I wouldn't agree with that nonsense at all. Jordan didn't retire the 80's stars. Age and injury did. That is pretty clear. And they wiped the floor with him in their prime.

What Jordan did do is beat the 80's B stars in the watered down 90s in a league in which Stern couldn't do enough to give Jordan every advantage (cough: push off on Russell).

Jordan was zero for five in actually even having a winning season without Pippen. How can you possibly so easily ignore that reality? Like another poster said, he was the third best player on his own college team. When he retired the first time, the Bulls didn't lose much.

Bird beat him 14 times in a row. If Dirk beat Durant 14 straight times or LBJ beat Kobe 14 straight times or KG beat Duncan 14 straight times; we wouldn't be calling out Durant, Kobe or Duncan as the greatest most likely.

Yes, of course Bird had a better team when he did it. That's not the point. The point is that if Jordan was so great he wouldn't have got his ass swept twice. He wouldn't have put up a donut in the 4th quarter while Bird was busting 15 in his eye with McHale out on his own home court. He wouldn't have choked in the Game 4 at home of the 1989 ECF against the Pistions, up 2-1 at home!

And why were Bird's teams so great? You can point to talent; but how misguided is that. He never played with a great athlete like a Pippen or even a Worthy. When he was finally going to get a chance with Bias, the dude died. He won, because he was out there playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers. He won because he was arguably the greatest shooter of all-time to boot.

Jordan was a unique talent. I'll give him that. And he did some things on the court better than anyone probably ever has. But you have to keep it in perspective. Basketball is still a team sport and it's not athleticism only. It still comes down to a comprehensive skill set.

And it's not a a matter of simply admitting that either Bird was better or his team was better b/c the Bulls were inferior to prior teams. It's a matter of understanding the eras. You have no idea how much expansion diluted the talent as it was already on the down hill. Look at league scoring by year to see. At one point, Stern was so desperate that he moved the three point line in. And to the end, watch yt vids of Jordan in the three point contest vs. Bird in the three point contest and you'll see the crazy difference in their shots.

You have to understand just how much better the 80's were than the 90's. There were four, maybe five teams that I would rank better than the Bulls. The Celtics and Lakers of course. But an equally worthy team is the Sixers who had went to a couple championships in the late seventies and went to a few more in the early 80's. Bird literally had to compete against two "dynasty" quality teams. People forget that the Sixers went 10 deep and their bench was about as good as their starters. And in a three or four year span there, Moses Malone and Dr. J won all the MVPs.

Then the Twin Tower Rockets were good for a few years there; but certainly not as good for as long as the Bulls. And the Bad Boys; I mean really the mid 80's to late 80's Bad Boys pretty much have it on the Bulls too.

It's simply idiotic to take a simple minded approach by ring counting or all of the sudden Robert Horry is great at 7 rings or Bill Russell is greatest by far at 11 rings. You have to look at all the details.

You make a lot of great points. Can't say you are wrong. But just some things to consider. Jordan clearly peaked when he won his first 3 championships, took a break, and then came back and still owned the sport. He wasn't the same guy who lost to the Celtics, Pistons or Lakers. Not the same guy that played in college. Do you know why I was such a great wrestler my senior year? Because I got beat up my Sophomore and Junior years by Seniors. Who knows who would beat who if we were both seniors. Typically we always think the older kid was better but that's only because he beat up on the younger one for 3 years. Hard to get that out of our memory. I often wonder if I was as good as B. Blair. He was a beast! But so was I. But I think if I met him today I would still be intimidated by him. I hate younger kids who run into me and suggest they could have beat me if we were both seniors. Disrespectful to their elders I say. I never do that to older guys. I go by who did better at the State tournament. Doesn't matter if my competition was better than yours. I took 5th and I know guys who wrestled at really low weight classes but they placed higher than me. So I bow to them, even though they were at ***** weight classes. :eusa_shhh:

Jordan is still the best. Sorry. Who do you think is the best?

I'll even give you that the league was watered down when Jordan won, but he still owned it. No one else came close during his time. Ewing, Reggie Miller, Karl Malone, Mourning. They all tried but couldn't come close.

While I'm sure you were much more skillful you're senior year as a wrestler, I'm sure you were also much more stronger and certainly not on the downhill of your physical skills.

And let me put it this way; had Bird and McHale still been healthy, even in their older years; I wouldn't have bet on them to lose to a prime Jordan and Pippen. They wiped the floor with them before the injuries and that wasn't changing.

Forward to Jordan on his last legs. Who was he competing against? An older Reggie Miller, an older Patrick Ewing, an older Clyde Drexler, an older and fatter Charles Barkley, an older John Stockton and Karl Malone. You can't pretend that those situations are at all the same. And had he not retired the first time, experts tend to believe he would have lost to the older Olajuwon and Older Drexler whereas Bird wiped the floor with a prime Olajuwon and Sampson Twin Tower combo.

You stick any Bulls team into the 80's and they're not the favorite. And depending on the year, maybe about the 4th or 5th best team only. The Bulls were basically a Miami Heat plus one team. They're not all that great despite our propensity to label them a dynasty.
 
Last edited:
marquis2.gif
 
I knew that the Pacers would blow out the Heat in one of their two home games. They aren't slouches and the Heat are over rated. The Pacers played very tough against a much better Bulls team last year and they were a break or two away from winning that series.
 
Greg Anthony G 6-0
Stacey Augmon F-G 6-6
Erick Barkley G 6-1
Dale Davis F 6-11
Gary Grant G 6-3 185
Antonio Harvey F-C 6-11
Shawn Kemp F-C 6-10
Will Perdue C 7-0 240
Scottie Pippen
Arvydas Sabonis C 7-3 279
Detlef Schrempf F-C 6-9 214
Steve Smith G 6-7 200
Damon Stoudamire G 5-10 171
Rod Strickland G 6-3 175
Rasheed Wallace F-C
Bonzi Wells G-F

I'm sure the refs had something to say about it. But Pippen was the engine to that team and those Blazers were the better team. So they choked. It happens. But it wasn't b/c Pippen wasn't great. He was a bit past his prime by then, but he was very important to that team and making them the realistic best team that year.
 
Back
Top Bottom