200 congressMEN were treated with Ivermectin.

[AMart]

Would be nice too see their Pfizer stock trading history.

 

[22lcidw]

Most vaccines take more than one initial dose. That IS NORMAL, and expected.

Why Some Vaccines Require More Than One Dose

Why Some Vaccines Require More Than One Dose

www.huffpost.com

______________

Despite being declared beaten in 2000, measles is back, due largely to declining vaccination rates in parts of the United States.
"We should not be in this boat," Dr. Pritish Tosh, an infectious diseases physician and researcher at the Mayo Clinic, told The Huffington Post. "This is a completely preventable disease."

That's because of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, which Tosh called "phenomenal" in its ability to protect large percentages of the general population.

The vaccine is one of several different vaccines, however, that are given in multiple doses. Children receive the first dose of the MMR vaccine between 12 and 15 months and the second before they go to school, around age 4 to 6.

Every vaccine ever created has to take many variables into consideration, he explained, including the individual pathogen or bug; how our immune systems respond to it; what parts of the bug can be used to generate an immune response that is protective in nature; and also how long that response will last. Because that equation is notably complex, sometimes a second (or third) dose is a good idea.

"Sometimes, if you take a large group of people with one vaccination you might expect 90 percent [to be protected]," he said. "But if you give a second dose, you may get up to 98 percent." Rather than testing the population to find the 10 percent not protected by the first dose, "what is probably a more straightforward strategy is just giving two doses to insure you have that high level of protection," he said.

Children's immune systems may not be developed enough to produce the kind of lasting immune response they need for a lifetime of protection, said Tosh. So some of the precise timing required for various vaccines takes into consideration "when you would expect a child to be able to actually generate protective immunity," he said.

But at any age, a second dose can help fine-tune a person's protection. "The first time you are presented with a pathogen, you generate an immune response," he said. "But then if you are presented with that same pathogen again a few years later, your immune system is able to produce a more specific and longer-lasting response in general."

Take, for example, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, which is administered in three doses. The second shot is given one to two months after the initial dose, and the third is given six months after the first. It's recommended for use in girls and boys at around ages 11 or 12 and up to age 26 in women and 21 in men, because we're less likely to generate the type of protective immunity we need after those ages, said Tosh.

That doesn't mean that a child who has had only a single dose of, say, the measles vaccine, is unprotected. "Some people may on one dose generate [a] long-lasting and very specific immune response. Some people may need two doses," said Tosh. "It's difficult to determine who those people are going to be." Which is why, he stressed, "I would recommend if people have not gotten their full initial complement of vaccines, to get their catchup doses."

Trust is difficult. What if people believing they are protecting themselves in this virus issue end up being the Puppies with the vaccine being the sand fleas.

 

[Rogue AI]

It calls out in the article that they can only presume what fully vaccinated requires, with time.... They may think it's one dose or two doses, but need another one.... later on....

It really is just a normal part of the vaccine process.....honestly!

If they don't know, it's experimental.

 

[BlindBoo]

And wouldn't it cure shit for brains too?

It would be a bonus!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So since these treatments are generic drugs, meaning the patents have run out, are they being demonized by the media who are all paid hundreds of millions of dollars in advertising?

BEFORE

The vaccines these treatments were WIDELY BEING used and quite successfully.

The left ......sigh

Natural Immunity has no Lobbyists

 

[Juicin]

Most vaccines take more than one initial dose. That IS NORMAL, and expected.

Why Some Vaccines Require More Than One Dose

Why Some Vaccines Require More Than One Dose

www.huffpost.com

______________

Despite being declared beaten in 2000, measles is back, due largely to declining vaccination rates in parts of the United States.
"We should not be in this boat," Dr. Pritish Tosh, an infectious diseases physician and researcher at the Mayo Clinic, told The Huffington Post. "This is a completely preventable disease."

That's because of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, which Tosh called "phenomenal" in its ability to protect large percentages of the general population.

The vaccine is one of several different vaccines, however, that are given in multiple doses. Children receive the first dose of the MMR vaccine between 12 and 15 months and the second before they go to school, around age 4 to 6.

Every vaccine ever created has to take many variables into consideration, he explained, including the individual pathogen or bug; how our immune systems respond to it; what parts of the bug can be used to generate an immune response that is protective in nature; and also how long that response will last. Because that equation is notably complex, sometimes a second (or third) dose is a good idea.

"Sometimes, if you take a large group of people with one vaccination you might expect 90 percent [to be protected]," he said. "But if you give a second dose, you may get up to 98 percent." Rather than testing the population to find the 10 percent not protected by the first dose, "what is probably a more straightforward strategy is just giving two doses to insure you have that high level of protection," he said.

Children's immune systems may not be developed enough to produce the kind of lasting immune response they need for a lifetime of protection, said Tosh. So some of the precise timing required for various vaccines takes into consideration "when you would expect a child to be able to actually generate protective immunity," he said.

But at any age, a second dose can help fine-tune a person's protection. "The first time you are presented with a pathogen, you generate an immune response," he said. "But then if you are presented with that same pathogen again a few years later, your immune system is able to produce a more specific and longer-lasting response in general."

Take, for example, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, which is administered in three doses. The second shot is given one to two months after the initial dose, and the third is given six months after the first. It's recommended for use in girls and boys at around ages 11 or 12 and up to age 26 in women and 21 in men, because we're less likely to generate the type of protective immunity we need after those ages, said Tosh.

That doesn't mean that a child who has had only a single dose of, say, the measles vaccine, is unprotected. "Some people may on one dose generate [a] long-lasting and very specific immune response. Some people may need two doses," said Tosh. "It's difficult to determine who those people are going to be." Which is why, he stressed, "I would recommend if people have not gotten their full initial complement of vaccines, to get their catchup doses."

measles is not a cold

there are animal resevoirs

even if the vaccine was effective as the measles vaccine, and the spread was much lower, still wouldn't work because the mutations would occur in animals

Which is why they vaccinate zoo animals and deer, LOL

Not that it matters, these mrna vaccines do not prevent spread for any substantive length of time

We did not cure the common cold people, if we did our case rates would have dropped months ago.

 

[Care4all]

If they don't know, it's experimental.

All new vaccines are experimental, on doses needed for full immunity.... Not for safety measures....safety has to pass trials early on....actually, before human trials, then during trial followup, early in process of trials. The duration of the vaccines simply takes time, the dose needed, simply takes time, to figure that out.... Based on antibody creation and waning that may take place.

 

[DrLove]

Yep, there is no doubt in my mind that there are 200 idiots in congress.

 

[Care4all]

measles is not a cold

there are animal resevoirs

even if the vaccine was effective as the measles vaccine, and the spread was much lower, still wouldn't work because the mutations would occur in animals

Which is why they vaccinate zoo animals and deer, LOL

Not that it matters, these mrna vaccines do not prevent spread for any substantive length of time

We did not cure the common cold people, if we did our case rates would have dropped months ago.

And chicken pox? Shingles? HPV shots? Tetnus?

It is possible we will need a covid shot seasonally, just like a flu shot.... But we still don't know that yet....we simply need time, to figure that all out.

 

[Juicin]

And chicken pox? Shingles? HPV shots? Tetnus?

It is possible we will need a covid shot seasonally, just like a flu shot.... But we still don't know that yet....we simply need time, to figure that all out.

Even with seasonal shots, we're never going to get the mix just right to end covid in anythign approaching the way we ended measles

Clearly is not going to happen

Yes each flu shot they have a chance to end influenza too, hasn't happened yet. Don't hold your breathe, you'll die.

They couldn't even justify* bringing a cold vaccine to market pre 2020. That's how hard it is. It's not going to happen. We are not going to vax our way out of this. As we knew in 2019. Was never on the table to anyone sane. And again even if they could. Animal reservoirs would ruin it and we would have this problem again sooner or later.

edit - and that shingles vax is a joke. Every old man i've ever met who got it...Got shingles right after lol

Not a huge sample size but still. Fuck that shingles vax i'll take my chances

 

[Lesh]

That's because dearest simpleton -- there's a DIFF between prophylactic treatment and therapeutics. THANKS for pointing out the diff between public health messaging and actual science.

For instance HCQuine is on the WHO list of top 100 administered drugs. It has an IMPECCABLE safety record and is the GO TO drug for PREVENTION of malaria.. Because it reduces the "case numbers" of folks who GET full blown malarial infections.. But once they GET malaria -- the drug formulary CHANGES to a new set of therapeutics..

All this is WAAY thefuck too complicated for you or Joe Biden to comprehend. That's why he and wallinsky rely on mandates and punishments for vaccines and wont MENTION natural immunity or prophylactic drugs..

Yea...HCQ is great...for malaria.

Horse dewormer is great for deworming horses.

Neither to squat for covid though

 

[Lesh]

And chicken pox? Shingles? HPV shots? Tetnus?

It is possible we will need a covid shot seasonally, just like a flu shot.... But we still don't know that yet....we simply need time, to figure that all out.

Going for my Moderna booster tomorrow

Yea!@

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What a crock of shit. Science INFORMS public health...

And "pushing natural immunity" when we have a vaccine is fucking STUPID.

We HAVE vaccines that are safe and effective and you're telling people that getting the virus is better.

You're insane

He meant if you already have natural immunity you may not need a vaccine.

 

[Lesh]

He meant if you already have natural immunity you may not need a vaccine.

So Azog is the "stupid to English " translator?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Going for my Moderna booster tomorrow

Yea!@

Free stuff and Herr Lesh is front and center. This also confirms you're an old man.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So Azog is the "stupid to English " translator?

I need to translate it for you. Obviously he did not insinuate for you to catch the virus LOL.

 

[Lesh]

I need to translate it for you. Obviously he did not insinuate for you to catch the virus LOL.

As we have seen from your posts...you are fluent in "stupid".

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

As we have seen from your posts...you are fluent in "stupid".

That is why I understand you so well.

 

[Clipper]

The original Tweet from Kory was "100 to 200".. And a FURTHER tweet clarified that NO "Frontline Doctor" would release medical records of anyone they treated".. The SOURCE was "member or staff" inside CONGRESS -- NOT Dr. Kory..

As much as I dismiss ANYTHING on Twitter - folks should KNOW that "important people" ARE getting scripts filled for Ivermectin or HCQuine. Usually THROUGH Frontline Doctors (as I'm told) and this story is probably credible..

For instance -- Mark Levin recently volunteered that he's been on HCQuine for about 18 months now.. AND -- he's fully vaccinated. He's some kind of heart patient but has had no issues..

Who gives a fuck what Levin does? If he has a heart it's ruled by his bank account. And anyone who listens to that asshole & takes medical advice from that fuck gets what they deserve.

 

[Rogue AI]

Does this booster requirement to be fully vaxxed mean we are a nation of unvaxxed heathens again? Or will the lying government just carry over the newly minted heathens presuming they will get the booster? My guess this administration will lie and pretend they are inching closer to the goal they never achieved to begin with.