Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Enough time for a rigorous psychological evaluation of the petitioner/applicant.
90 days.
Not a chance. You said it was human nature for the bill to be unclean. I asked you to back it up. You couldn’t. You were full of shit, just like I explained to you.No more full of shit than you were a few pages ago. Let's not, okay?
Republicans refuse to a 7-day extension for background checks, calling it “hostile towards lawful gun owners and lawful firearm transactions.”Enough time for a rigorous psychological evaluation of the petitioner/applicant.
90 days.
Or just a smaller time frame to get more done. But whoops, that didn’t go anywhere thanks to Republicans.But since that time limit is so long, there are bound to be lawsuits that would be upheld on 2nd Amendment grounds by the courts.
The ideal solution would be a constitutional amendment, which isn't going to happen given the polarity of our politics.
Not a chance. You said it was human nature for the bill to be unclean. I asked you to back it up. You couldn’t. You were full of shit, just like I explained to you.
Or just a smaller time frame to get more done. But whoops, that didn’t go anywhere thanks to Republicans.
Not my fault you said something stupid and got called out on it.Now the onus is on you to explain how you weren't full of shit either.
This is getting childish.
Republicans refuse to a 7-day extension for background checks, calling it “hostile towards lawful gun owners and lawful firearm transactions.”
AND YOU THINK THEY WOULD AGREE TO A 90 DAY BACKGROUND CHECK????
Lmao. Give me a break. Write up that bill right now and Democrats would easily agree.
Regardless, might I ask what this has to do with the overall discussion?Not my fault you said something stupid and got called out on it.
The bill wasn’t unclean. It wasn’t human nature. You were wrong.
You mean the one that no Republicans voted for? That one?The Manchin Toomey Amendment went nowhere because 4 Democrats voted against it in 2013, when Democrats held the tiebreaker in the Senate. Democrats had the power to pass it.
Thanks, Democrats.
Weird. I don’t recall saying that at all.And you think I vote for Republicans purely on this issue. How naive.
Weird. I don’t recall saying that at all.
Looks like you’re full of shit. Again.
The overall discussion was on expanding background checks, which you claimed to be in favor of until I showed you that your Republican overlords were against it. At that point, you proceeded to justify the actions of your Republican overlords, claiming that it was the Democrats who proposed an unclean bill which is their human nature. At that point I showed you the bill and challenged you to find the unclean part that you claimed to exist. You couldn’t find it and now you’re wondering how we went down that rabbit hole in the first place. So this is how.Regardless, might I ask what this has to do with the overall discussion?
They did. I just posted an example of that.Nope. You kept saying 'the party you voted for blocked X'
So, you can retire that phrase now.
They did. I just posted an example of that.
And I still didn’t say that you vote for Republicans purely due to the gun issue.
So you’re full of shit. Again.
QED
Run along then.I’m out. This discussion has served its purpose as far as I’m concerned.
Have a good one.
The utter lack of seriousness of this post is seriously unserious.The overall discussion was on expanding background checks, which you claimed to be in favor of until I showed you that your Republican overlords were against it. At that point, you proceeded to justify the actions of your Republican overlords, claiming that it was the Democrats who proposed an unclean bill which is their human nature. At that point I showed you the bill and challenged you to find the unclean part that you claimed to exist. You couldn’t find it and now you’re wondering how we went down that rabbit hole in the first place. So this is how.
