1st Capitol rioter to stand trial gets 7 years, the longest sentence for a Jan. 6 defendant so far

[Correll]

There is nothing similar either in reality or under the law.

Your position is that nothing is similar to anything?

My god, you've gone.... you are just gone.

 

[Correll]

They have equal protections, dope. They’re getting their due process.

Nope. They are clearly not. They are being made examples of, to terrorize other righties into submission.


That is tyranny.

 

[Correll]

Equal protection YES.
Equal evidence, NO.

The problem with those who pulled off January 6th, is they attacked a building with thousands of video cameras covering the building both inside and out. They in Trumpian fashion didn't wear masks, and hence were easily identified, unlike the BLM rioters, who for the most part, wore masks, and didn't commit their crimes while on surveillance cameras.

Plenty of video of plenty of the riots.

I've heard nothing of them being followed up on, like the 1/6 rioters.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Your position is that nothing is similar to anything?

My god, you've gone.... you are just gone.

Reality is often difficult with your type.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Nope. They are clearly not. They are being made examples of, to terrorize other righties into submission.


That is tyranny.

They clearly are as the trial has concluded, dope.

 

[Faun]

One party? How so? Aren't we all supposed to protect the Capitol from a terrorist attack? What's that got to do with "Sieg Heil?"

Americans do want the Capitol protected from terrorist attacks. Trumptards are anti-American.

 

[Faun]

No, it's not.


It is clear. Your excuse of "PLACE" for the difference in treatment of the 1/6 rioters has been debunked.


Thus, my point is validated. The excessive focus on investigation, prosecuting and over charging those specific rioters, is a massive violation of the Equal Protections Clause.


Thus, any and all prisoners from it, will be political prisoners, doing time primarily based on their politics not their actual behavior.

Of course it is. I quoted YOUR source saying they were invited in and not told to leave.

 

[Correll]

They clearly are as the trial has concluded, dope.

That fact that a trial CONCLUDED, to you, is proof that due process was followed?


That is one of the most senseless things I have ever heard.


You lefties, you are sophists. Just because you response was structured as a counter point, doesn't mean it actually was a counter point.


What you said there, the message it actually communicated is that you are willing to just talk nonsense, instead of admitting that your opponent ie, me, is right.

 

[WEATHER53]

So the First person sentenced got the longest sentence ever
Another fake thread title

 

[Correll]

Of course it is. I quoted YOUR source saying they were invited in and not told to leave.

My source explained the reasoning of the dems that decided to not prosecute. That does not mean that their reasons are correct or make sense.

As I have shown. NOt told to leave? THEY WERE PHYSICALLY ESCORTED FROM THE BUILDING. That is being told by actions, to LEAVE.


The excuses for not going after them, are stupid, weak bullshit.


Regardless, teh point is made. The PLACE was teh same, the result was kid glove treatment. Thus, your defense of PLACE is debunked.


That you stonewall, is to be expected. LIbs are all liars.


My point stands. The making an example of the 1/6 rioters is a violation of their human rights. This is a massive injustice and all the convicted will be political prisoners.

 

[Faun]

My source explained the reasoning of the dems that decided to not prosecute. That does not mean that their reasons are correct or make sense.

As I have shown. NOt told to leave? THEY WERE PHYSICALLY ESCORTED FROM THE BUILDING. That is being told by actions, to LEAVE.


The excuses for not going after them, are stupid, weak bullshit.


Regardless, teh point is made. The PLACE was teh same, the result was kid glove treatment. Thus, your defense of PLACE is debunked.


That you stonewall, is to be expected. LIbs are all liars.


My point stands. The making an example of the 1/6 rioters is a violation of their human rights. This is a massive injustice and all the convicted will be political prisoners.

Your point is DOA, putz. Your own link sunk you. Invited in and not asked to leave.

 

[BWK]

Nope. They are clearly not. They are being made examples of, to terrorize other righties into submission.


That is tyranny.

The law could care less about your feelings and emotions. Try again.

 

[BWK]

Your point is DOA, putz. Your own link sunk you. Invited in and not asked to leave.

Their wild imaginations only put more of the terrorists in jail, and they aren't smart enough to see that.

 

[BWK]

Do you not understand that discussing the Equal Protections clause, requires comparing these crimes vs other crimes?

Please keep your answer concise. This is a very simple question, answer it and we can move on from this... minor issue.

The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause requires states to practice equal protection. Equal protection forces a state to govern impartially—not draw distinctions between individuals solely on differences that are irrelevant to a legitimate governmental objective. One more time for those who use the short bus. For you to be able to use the clause, it requires there be something to compare it to. And one more time, my links destroy that possibility based on the evidence I presented. This is a simple question. Unfortunately for you, you have zero understanding of what you are comparing, so you can answer the question yourself.

 

[BWK]

Several formal insurrections among the antifa and blm riots. So, that's excuse is debunked.


View attachment 678248

More non-informative nonsense. ANTIFA is not a thing you idiot. Dude, are you fucking retarded? How many times does someone need to explain to you what ANTIFA is?

 

[Correll]

Your point is DOA, putz. Your own link sunk you. Invited in and not asked to leave.

Sure they were. The excuse given was retarded. Your defense of PLACE for the difference in treatment of the 1/6 rioters is debunked.


You lost. YOu are just too dishonest to admit it.

 

[Correll]

The law could care less about your feelings and emotions. Try again.

The law is being ignored, by people like you, but with power. That is injustice.


Your support of that, makes you a bad person.


Hey, btw, don't whine like a faggot, when we match your escalation.

 

[Correll]

The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause requires states to practice equal protection. Equal protection forces a state to govern impartially—not draw distinctions between individuals solely on differences that are irrelevant to a legitimate governmental objective. One more time for those who use the short bus. For you to be able to use the clause, it requires there be something to compare it to. And one more time, my links destroy that possibility based on the evidence I presented. This is a simple question. Unfortunately for you, you have zero understanding of what you are comparing, so you can answer the question yourself.

i did compare it to the way other rioters are treated.


Remember when you pretended to be too stupid and thought that I was going off topic?

 

[Correll]

More non-informative nonsense. ANTIFA is not a thing you idiot. Dude, are you fucking retarded? How many times does someone need to explain to you what ANTIFA is?

I know what antifa is. My point stands. You say "coup", and I pointed out that there were several formal insurrections among the antifa and blm riots.


And they were treated with kid gloves by comparison.


See what I did there? I COMPARED two groups of "insurrections" and pointed out that their treatment was different.


YOu going to address that, or keep pretending to not understand?

 

[Faun]

Sure they were. The excuse given was retarded. Your defense of PLACE for the difference in treatment of the 1/6 rioters is debunked.


You lost. YOu are just too dishonest to admit it.

Spits the idiot who was taken down by his own link.