14 year old shoots 5 family members dead as US killing fields clam 10,000 victims this year

[Godboy]

You don't think a 14 year old could kill his family with gasoline? Are you really this stupid?

You're trying to scapegoat guns with gasoline. That's some serious fucked up shit. You're deranged.

You said he was stupid for suggesting he could have just burned the house down. Thats why YOU are stupid.

He's trying to say that we don't need more gun control because he could have also burned the house down. The 2 things aren't equivalent or associated. He's morally bankrupt and out of rational arguments. Now go get an adult to explain this post to you.

What gun control would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

We're the only country with mass shootings as a regular thing. Take your pick.

Take my pick of what?

I'll ask again... What gun control would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

 

[Taz]

You're trying to scapegoat guns with gasoline. That's some serious fucked up shit. You're deranged.

You said he was stupid for suggesting he could have just burned the house down. Thats why YOU are stupid.

He's trying to say that we don't need more gun control because he could have also burned the house down. The 2 things aren't equivalent or associated. He's morally bankrupt and out of rational arguments. Now go get an adult to explain this post to you.

What gun control would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

We're the only country with mass shootings as a regular thing. Take your pick.

And they use trucks to cause even more deaths in other places. Do you care about the victims or just banning a tool?

Which country has constant truck mass murders? Ok... like... outside the Middle East, lol.

 

[Taz]

You're trying to scapegoat guns with gasoline. That's some serious fucked up shit. You're deranged.

You said he was stupid for suggesting he could have just burned the house down. Thats why YOU are stupid.

He's trying to say that we don't need more gun control because he could have also burned the house down. The 2 things aren't equivalent or associated. He's morally bankrupt and out of rational arguments. Now go get an adult to explain this post to you.

What gun control would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

We're the only country with mass shootings as a regular thing. Take your pick.

Take my pick of what?

I'll ask again... What gun control would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

Lots of countries don't have this kind of constant mass murder shit. Take your pick.

 

[Katniss]

Boy, 14, admits killing five family members

A 14-year-old boy in Alabama has been charged with murder after confessing to killing five members of his own family, US police say.

The boy is accused of killing three siblings, aged six months, five and six, as well as his father John Sisk, 38, and stepmother Mary Sisk, 35.

He is being charged as a juvenile but could face being tried as an adult.

The shooting happened late on Monday in the small town of Elkmont in northern Alabama.

The good guy with a gun must have been saving lives elsewhere whilst this was going on.

I wonder what lessons this gun crazy country might learn from this ?

Spank that ass! I had my own gun by the time I was 11, have never shot another human being. There was that time I shot a bulletproof windshield somebody dumped in the woods and it came back and nicked my calf, though.

I think we are living in a different time. I grew up with guns and never thought of them as dangerous but it's like my dad always said, I don't worry about you.....I worry about the other guy (or gal in my case - lol).

There seems to be a lack of accountability or maturity in the younger generation of today and it's created this warped universe where killing another human being has little meaning.

Nonsense.

There has been complaining about the ‘younger generation’ being ‘warped’ and ‘immoral’ for more than 2000 years.

People haven’t ‘changed’ – they’re no better or worse than they were 50 years ago or 100 years ago.

What’s changed in the 27/7 news-cycle; the internet, smartphones, tweeting, and messaging – we hear about everything happening everywhere all the time instantly.

Very possible.

 

[Godboy]

You said he was stupid for suggesting he could have just burned the house down. Thats why YOU are stupid.

He's trying to say that we don't need more gun control because he could have also burned the house down. The 2 things aren't equivalent or associated. He's morally bankrupt and out of rational arguments. Now go get an adult to explain this post to you.

What gun control would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

We're the only country with mass shootings as a regular thing. Take your pick.

Take my pick of what?

I'll ask again... What gun control would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

Lots of countries don't have this kind of constant mass murder shit. Take your pick.

Take my pick of what?

 

[ViewFromAbove]

WHERE did that 14-yr-old get the gun?
Was it owned by a family member that got killed, like in that infamous grade school mass shooting in Connecticut a few years ago, where mom got shot in bed by her son?

Lesson? Live by the gun, DIE by the gun?!

 

[satrebil]

Name me a country that doesn't have murderers.

We're the only country that has mass shootings on a regular basis.

That wasn't the fucking question now was it?

Let's try again, real slowly:

NAME. ME. A. COUNTRY. THAT. DOESN'T. HAVE. MURDERERS.

You mean that doesn't have MASS MURDERERS ON A REGULAR BASIS! Which would be every other fucking country.

Every other fucking country, eh? Like Mexico? Brazil? Colombia? The ENTIRE fucking Middle East?

Shut up you moron.

So your only defense is a bunch of shitholes. You lose brah.

YOU made the claim that "every other fucking country" has no mass murdering on a regular basis. Key word: EVERY. Which is an absolute lie. And this is after you deflected the opening question not once, but twice - because just like every other dumb shit leftist you are incapable of critical thinking and cannot comprehend a deviation from the narrative you've been fed by your leftist talking heads. You have to twist and convolute the discussion so you can stroke your e-peen and lull yourself into a false sense of victory. Pathetic.

There's a loser here all right: You.

 

[theHawk]

Boy, 14, admits killing five family members

A 14-year-old boy in Alabama has been charged with murder after confessing to killing five members of his own family, US police say.

The boy is accused of killing three siblings, aged six months, five and six, as well as his father John Sisk, 38, and stepmother Mary Sisk, 35.

He is being charged as a juvenile but could face being tried as an adult.

The shooting happened late on Monday in the small town of Elkmont in northern Alabama.

The good guy with a gun must have been saving lives elsewhere whilst this was going on.

I wonder what lessons this gun crazy country might learn from this ?

The boy is clearly a mental nutcase.

Probably a queer.

 

[Jitss617]

Boy, 14, admits killing five family members

A 14-year-old boy in Alabama has been charged with murder after confessing to killing five members of his own family, US police say.

The boy is accused of killing three siblings, aged six months, five and six, as well as his father John Sisk, 38, and stepmother Mary Sisk, 35.

He is being charged as a juvenile but could face being tried as an adult.

The shooting happened late on Monday in the small town of Elkmont in northern Alabama.

The good guy with a gun must have been saving lives elsewhere whilst this was going on.

I wonder what lessons this gun crazy country might learn from this ?

That’s what happens when you change the culture of a country

 

[Taz]

He's trying to say that we don't need more gun control because he could have also burned the house down. The 2 things aren't equivalent or associated. He's morally bankrupt and out of rational arguments. Now go get an adult to explain this post to you.

What gun control would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

We're the only country with mass shootings as a regular thing. Take your pick.

Take my pick of what?

I'll ask again... What gun control would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

Lots of countries don't have this kind of constant mass murder shit. Take your pick.

Take my pick of what?

Of countries that don't have constant mass shootings. What is it that you don't get?

 

[Taz]

We're the only country that has mass shootings on a regular basis.

That wasn't the fucking question now was it?

Let's try again, real slowly:

NAME. ME. A. COUNTRY. THAT. DOESN'T. HAVE. MURDERERS.

You mean that doesn't have MASS MURDERERS ON A REGULAR BASIS! Which would be every other fucking country.

Every other fucking country, eh? Like Mexico? Brazil? Colombia? The ENTIRE fucking Middle East?

Shut up you moron.

So your only defense is a bunch of shitholes. You lose brah.

YOU made the claim that "every other fucking country" has no mass murdering on a regular basis. Key word: EVERY. Which is an absolute lie. And this is after you deflected the opening question not once, but twice - because just like every other dumb shit leftist you are incapable of critical thinking and cannot comprehend a deviation from the narrative you've been fed by your leftist talking heads. You have to twist and convolute the discussion so you can stroke your e-peen and lull yourself into a false sense of victory. Pathetic.

There's a loser here all right: You.

Ok, so tell me which countries do have constant mass shootings by individual crazies?

 

[westwall]

He couln't have killed them with gasoline?

You've said some dumb shit before, but this might be the dumbest. You should think of going for a mental health checkup. I know, you won't, you're afraid you won't pass the exam.

Says the ignoramous who ignores actual facts. The simple reality is violent crazy people murder. The tools don't matter. You can't ban every tool no matter how hard you try. The truck attacks in France proved that to thinking people. How about you try thinking some time. You might learn something.

Actually, we're the only country that has these kinds of constant mass shootings. Care to explain why? I'l wait.

Because we have millions of illegal third world people who have brought their violent culture with them.

Want to know what Europe does not have? Latin Americans. Latin America has 8% of the world's population yet suffers 31% of the world's murders.

We have them here, they don't.

 

[Katniss]

Boy, 14, admits killing five family members

A 14-year-old boy in Alabama has been charged with murder after confessing to killing five members of his own family, US police say.

The boy is accused of killing three siblings, aged six months, five and six, as well as his father John Sisk, 38, and stepmother Mary Sisk, 35.

He is being charged as a juvenile but could face being tried as an adult.

The shooting happened late on Monday in the small town of Elkmont in northern Alabama.

The good guy with a gun must have been saving lives elsewhere whilst this was going on.

I wonder what lessons this gun crazy country might learn from this ?

The boy is clearly a mental nutcase.

Probably a queer.

WHA?! hack.....cough.....I almost choked on my tea, hahahahaha. queer? Where'd that come from.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I keep seeing this number, one mass shooting for every day of the year so far, or some such shit... I have to assume they are including gang shootings, shootings committed during the commission of another crime, shootings spurred by acts domestic violence. That seems like a bit of a cheat to push the numbers up.

Prior to the push to curb our Constitutional rights, I believe the definition was along the lines of: a shooting in which four or more people are injured or killed by someone unknown to them and not part of another crime.

Or some such thing... Anyway, that seems like a reasonable definition... what are the numbers when that definition is used to compile statistics I wonder...

I bet it's a shitload lower that what we're currently being forced fed...

And what number would be acceptable?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I keep seeing this number, one mass shooting for every day of the year so far, or some such shit... I have to assume they are including gang shootings, shootings committed during the commission of another crime, shootings spurred by acts domestic violence. That seems like a bit of a cheat to push the numbers up.

Prior to the push to curb our Constitutional rights, I believe the definition was along the lines of: a shooting in which four or more people are injured or killed by someone unknown to them and not part of another crime.

Or some such thing... Anyway, that seems like a reasonable definition... what are the numbers when that definition is used to compile statistics I wonder...

I bet it's a shitload lower that what we're currently being forced fed...

Mass Shootings in 2019 | Gun Violence Archive
289 so far this year.
0 in the UK and most of Europe.

Yeah, they count every shooting. Gang, bank robbery, domestic, every single one. That will certainly boost the numbers in the favor of those hoping to infringe on people's Constitutional rights...

Nonsense.

None of the proposed firearm regulatory measures would ‘infringe’ on anyone’s Constitutional rights.

The measures are unwarranted, ineffective, and otherwise pointless – but they’re not ‘un-Constitutional,' having never been invalidated by the Supreme Court.

To claim otherwise is as much demagoguery as inflating the number of mass shootings.

 

[Rustic]

I keep seeing this number, one mass shooting for every day of the year so far, or some such shit... I have to assume they are including gang shootings, shootings committed during the commission of another crime, shootings spurred by acts domestic violence. That seems like a bit of a cheat to push the numbers up.

Prior to the push to curb our Constitutional rights, I believe the definition was along the lines of: a shooting in which four or more people are injured or killed by someone unknown to them and not part of another crime.

Or some such thing... Anyway, that seems like a reasonable definition... what are the numbers when that definition is used to compile statistics I wonder...

I bet it's a shitload lower that what we're currently being forced fed...

Mass Shootings in 2019 | Gun Violence Archive
289 so far this year.
0 in the UK and most of Europe.

Yeah, they count every shooting. Gang, bank robbery, domestic, every single one. That will certainly boost the numbers in the favor of those hoping to infringe on people's Constitutional rights...

Nonsense.

None of the proposed firearm regulatory measures would ‘infringe’ on anyone’s Constitutional rights.

The measures are unwarranted, ineffective, and otherwise pointless – but they’re not ‘un-Constitutional,' having never been invalidated by the Supreme Court.

To claim otherwise is as much demagoguery as inflating the number of mass shootings.

Lol
You are not the authority... you’re a fucking piece of shit

 

[Godboy]

What gun control would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

We're the only country with mass shootings as a regular thing. Take your pick.

Take my pick of what?

I'll ask again... What gun control would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

Lots of countries don't have this kind of constant mass murder shit. Take your pick.

Take my pick of what?

Of countries that don't have constant mass shootings. What is it that you don't get?

What does that have to do with the question? You are the one who said we need more gun control. What gun control policy would have stopped this kid from shooting these people?

 

[keepitreal]

Boy, 14, admits killing five family members

A 14-year-old boy in Alabama has been charged with murder after confessing to killing five members of his own family, US police say.

The boy is accused of killing three siblings, aged six months, five and six, as well as his father John Sisk, 38, and stepmother Mary Sisk, 35.

He is being charged as a juvenile but could face being tried as an adult.

The shooting happened late on Monday in the small town of Elkmont in northern Alabama.

The good guy with a gun must have been saving lives elsewhere whilst this was going on.

I wonder what lessons this gun crazy country might learn from this ?

You’re a fucking moron!

Why are kids killing people?

Toxic adults, toxic government so called leaders,
toxic perversity being called normal, toxic policies,
toxic SJW, toxic music, toxic games, toxic ADHD drugs,
toxic internet being the babysitter

 

[satrebil]

That wasn't the fucking question now was it?

Let's try again, real slowly:

NAME. ME. A. COUNTRY. THAT. DOESN'T. HAVE. MURDERERS.

You mean that doesn't have MASS MURDERERS ON A REGULAR BASIS! Which would be every other fucking country.

Every other fucking country, eh? Like Mexico? Brazil? Colombia? The ENTIRE fucking Middle East?

Shut up you moron.

So your only defense is a bunch of shitholes. You lose brah.

YOU made the claim that "every other fucking country" has no mass murdering on a regular basis. Key word: EVERY. Which is an absolute lie. And this is after you deflected the opening question not once, but twice - because just like every other dumb shit leftist you are incapable of critical thinking and cannot comprehend a deviation from the narrative you've been fed by your leftist talking heads. You have to twist and convolute the discussion so you can stroke your e-peen and lull yourself into a false sense of victory. Pathetic.

There's a loser here all right: You.

Ok, so tell me which countries do have constant mass shootings by individual crazies?

There you go, once again attempting to change the narrative.

For the THIRD time, the original question was: Name me a country that doesn't have murderers.

You're obsessing over method and quantity, which is ignorant. A person killed by a gun is no more dead than a person killed by a bomb, or a knife, or a truck. And If I'm dead set on killing a large amount of people the lack of access to a gun isn't going to stop me any more than it stopped Timothy McVeigh.

If you're going to compare us to other countries, then make a FAIR comparison. The UK is frequently thrown around, so let's use them.

Their murder rate is 1.2 per 100k. The USA's is 5.3 per 100k. HOWEVER there are other data points your leftist talking heads never mention:

1) We have over 5 times the population.
2) Most murder occurs in metropolitan areas. The UK has 18, we have 384.
3) Of our murders, 52% of them are committed by a single demographic: Blacks. Scream racism all you want, facts don't care about your feelings. They are 17% of the population and are responsible for over half of our murder rate. Blacks comprise only 3% of the UK population.

If you're going to compare us to other developed nations you don't get to just ignore all the contributing factors. Developed nations that have lower murder rates than us are almost universally more racially and culturally homogeneous than we are. Once the cult of multiculturalism takes hold and their tribalist bullshit grows, the violence increases. This is why London's murder rate recently surpassed NYC, this is why Sweden is turning into an absolute hell hole. History has shown, over and over and OVER, that when you increasingly mix cultures and races the inevitable result is conflict. It's the whole reason sovereign nations exist in the first place - you stay there, I'll stay here, and all is well.

 

[Muhammed]

I wonder what lessons this gun crazy country might learn from this ?

The Brits are a pathetic cowards who are afraid of the Crown.