12 Experts on What Might End the War

Clearly, the way to end the war, as opposed to merely rescheduling it with a ceasefire, is to remove the cause of the war, and the cause of the war is the Palestinians complete commitment to destroy Israel. The Palestinian cause is the destruction of Israel. There is no evidence they have any ambitions beyond that. This is not going to change, so the closest we can come to peace is to take away their ability to make war against Israel, and that is what Israel is in the process of doing.

In order to maintain this state of near-peace Israel must gain and maintain complete control over Gaza in order to prevent the Palestinians from rearming, but this is a very disagreeable prospect for everyone, so the emigration of the so called Palestinians from Gaza is the only path to long term peace.
Do you call them cockroaches too?
 
Clearly, the way to end the war, as opposed to merely rescheduling it with a ceasefire, is to remove the cause of the war, and the cause of the war is the Palestinians complete commitment to destroy Israel. The Palestinian cause is the destruction of Israel. There is no evidence they have any ambitions beyond that. This is not going to change, so the closest we can come to peace is to take away their ability to make war against Israel, and that is what Israel is in the process of doing.

In order to maintain this state of near-peace Israel must gain and maintain complete control over Gaza in order to prevent the Palestinians from rearming, but this is a very disagreeable prospect for everyone,
Yes, we agree. I can’t see any other viable government for the near future other than Israel.
so the emigration of the so called Palestinians from Gaza is the only path to long term peace.
Of course, anyone wanting to leave should be not be prevented. But I’m still uncomfortable with a forced displacement.
 
Do you too call Canada, France, and UK antisemitic for opposing your genocide?

One quick question -- can you name any other conflict within the last 15 years in which the aggrieved party was expected to furnish humanitarian aid to the people who invaded and attacked it, and end the war leaving hostages behind and leaving the aggressors to continue to rule?

If you can't, then Israel is being held to a standard different from any other country. According to the IHRA definition, anti-Semitism includes

"Applying double standards by requiring of it [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation."

so by that definition, yes, it is anti-Semitic. But if you can show that demanding of the attacked party that a war cease while the attackers hold hostages and are still in control (and have explicitly made a call for further violence and attacks) is a consistently applied expectation, then the criticism of Israel would be in line with other historical demands of attacked countries, and would simply be a criticism of Israel and not anti-Semitic.

Hope that clarifies.
 
Palestinianism = built on a LIE

__


Research: So-called “Palestinians”: The Truth about “Palestinian” Arabs A.K.A. Arab immigrants’ children, grandchildren & the vastly vacant desolate land prior to the rise of Jewish return.

 
Yes, we agree. I can’t see any other viable government for the near future other than Israel.

Of course, anyone wanting to leave should be not be prevented. But I’m still uncomfortable with a forced displacement.
Nobody will take them, because Palestinians have NEVER failed to foul their own nest. They have a well-earned reputation as human locusts.
 
More racist bull shit.

And yet, you KNOW I am, in all respects, correct. Each and every country stupid enough to accept Palestinian "refugees" has regretted it. Jordan had an attempted assassination of the king, a successful assassination of the Prime Minister, and a violent rebellion. In Lebanon, they started a civil war. In Kuwait, they enthusiastically supported Saddam Hussein's invasion. Egypt wanted nothing to do with them, to the extent of being willing to scuttle the Camp David Accords rather than take back Gaza.
 
And yet, you KNOW I am, in all respects, correct. Each and every country stupid enough to accept Palestinian "refugees" has regretted it. Jordan had an attempted assassination of the king, a successful assassination of the Prime Minister, and a violent rebellion. In Lebanon, they started a civil war. In Kuwait, they enthusiastically supported Saddam Hussein's invasion. Egypt wanted nothing to do with them, to the extent of being willing to scuttle the Camp David Accords rather than take back Gaza.
Not true and entirely dumb and racist. Do you believe everything the Zionist media tells you?
 
Not true and entirely dumb and racist. Do you believe everything the Zionist media tells you?
And yet...you will post nothing to contradict what I stated, because, yet again, we both know that I am, in ALL respects, exactly correct. You're dismissed.
 
Yes, we agree. I can’t see any other viable government for the near future other than Israel.

Of course, anyone wanting to leave should be not be prevented. But I’m still uncomfortable with a forced displacement.
Of course no one is talking about "forced displacement". No one will be marched at gunpoint and shipped to another country, but these wars the Palestinians start, five in the last twenty years, have made Gaza a very unpleasant place to live and several recent studies have shown half or more of the so called Palestinians are ready to leave now if they had the means to leave.

For seventy five years the UN, while ranting and raving about how hard life for the Palestinians is, has adamantly refused to provide any aid to those Palestinian so called refugees to start new lives in places less inhospitable than Gaza; now the US and Israel will provide that aid to the people of Gaza who want to leave.
 
Do you too call Canada, France, and UK antisemitic for opposing your genocide?

There is nothing I see in the text of the statement that is antisemitic. (It does not use the term genocide). It is pathetically impotent and blatant virtue signaling.

What is the point of calling for Hamas to negotiate its complete surrender when such a surrender can't be backed up with force because Israel's military has been hamstrung by the international community? How can Canada, France, UK call for Hamas to accept a total loss while simultaneously demanding that Israel cease all military actions and withdraw from Gaza? The two are not compatible.
 
Of course no one is talking about "forced displacement". No one will be marched at gunpoint and shipped to another country, but these wars the Palestinians start, five in the last twenty years, have made Gaza a very unpleasant place to live and several recent studies have shown half or more of the so called Palestinians are ready to leave now if they had the means to leave.

For seventy five years the UN, while ranting and raving about how hard life for the Palestinians is, has adamantly refused to provide any aid to those Palestinian so called refugees to start new lives in places less inhospitable than Gaza; now the US and Israel will provide that aid to the people of Gaza who want to leave.
It is a razor thin edge between voluntary relocation and making life too terrible to stay as a soft forced displacement. (Especially when certain idiots in the Israeli government say the quiet parts out loud and in public.)
 
Clearly, the way to end the war, as opposed to merely rescheduling it with a ceasefire, is to remove the cause of the war, and the cause of the war is the Palestinians complete commitment to destroy Israel. The Palestinian cause is the destruction of Israel. There is no evidence they have any ambitions beyond that. This is not going to change, so the closest we can come to peace is to take away their ability to make war against Israel, and that is what Israel is in the process of doing.

In order to maintain this state of near-peace Israel must gain and maintain complete control over Gaza in order to prevent the Palestinians from rearming, but this is a very disagreeable prospect for everyone, so the emigration of the so called Palestinians from Gaza is the only path to long term peace.
Sahara Safari

Don't listen to anything the professional pundits suggest. They have misled us time and time and again. Why look up to ignorant intellectual snobs who look down upon all of us?

The Paleonasty subhumans have to all be deported to somewhere far from Israel. No hired opinionist has suggested that obvious and realistic solution.
 
Palestinianism = built on a LIE

__


Research: So-called “Palestinians”: The Truth about “Palestinian” Arabs A.K.A. Arab immigrants’ children, grandchildren & the vastly vacant desolate land prior to the rise of Jewish return.

The Holy Land Was Hollow Until the Jews Returned
 
There is nothing I see in the text of the statement that is antisemitic. (It does not use the term genocide). It is pathetically impotent and blatant virtue signaling.

What is the point of calling for Hamas to negotiate its complete surrender when such a surrender can't be backed up with force because Israel's military has been hamstrung by the international community? How can Canada, France, UK call for Hamas to accept a total loss while simultaneously demanding that Israel cease all military actions and withdraw from Gaza? The two are not compatible.
You’ll soon deny you supported the genocide.
1747858177864.webp
 
You’ll soon deny you supported the genocide.
Should I ever be convinced it is actually a genocide, I will condemn it. But your silly memes fail to convince me.

Did you mean to withdraw and apologize for the lies you posted yesterday?
 
Back
Top Bottom