100% Obama Votes

[candycorn]

In the Philly.com article that was the root of all of this; it is cited that McCain got blanked in an almost equal number of voting precincts (54) and Bush got blanked in, I believe it was, 4. Nothing new to see here. Obama is very popular with his demographics.

You guys need to venture outside of your comfort zone and stop reading your talking points. Romney was a terrible candidate who ran a sorry campaign.

You'll be back in 2014.
You'll mis-interpret that as a mandate when it's just the TEA party flexing it's wallet
You'll bank hard to the right in 2016 just like you did this year
And you just may be looking at 4 more years of a Democrat in the White House (probably not though)

I suppose you realize that your argument only holds water if this is the FIRST time there was voter fraud. The only thing that makes the vote safe is those who work the polls, cheating, in my opinion, would be easy.

Uh no. The pattern suggests that 2012 was history repeating itself.

 

[Freewill]

well TM you may finally be right. The takers exceed the makers so the makers may never win another election, that is correct. We all will lose.

 

[Freewill]

In the Philly.com article that was the root of all of this; it is cited that McCain got blanked in an almost equal number of voting precincts (54) and Bush got blanked in, I believe it was, 4. Nothing new to see here. Obama is very popular with his demographics.

You guys need to venture outside of your comfort zone and stop reading your talking points. Romney was a terrible candidate who ran a sorry campaign.

You'll be back in 2014.
You'll mis-interpret that as a mandate when it's just the TEA party flexing it's wallet
You'll bank hard to the right in 2016 just like you did this year
And you just may be looking at 4 more years of a Democrat in the White House (probably not though)

I suppose you realize that your argument only holds water if this is the FIRST time there was voter fraud. The only thing that makes the vote safe is those who work the polls, cheating, in my opinion, would be easy.

Uh no. The pattern suggests that 2012 was history repeating itself.

And that history could be of fraud, do you disagree?

 

[Greenbeard]

Obama won. Stop clinging to the idea that the election was stolen because of fraud because it's not going to fucking work out well for you. Look at how well it worked out for the gore supporters.

I agree. Even as it becomes more apparent there were serious problems with the election, I've yet to see anything in the areas that count that would make a difference.

The "serious problem with the election" is continuing to (rightfully) take flak for his ongoing thoughtless and offensive comments.

Carlos Gutierrez, a senior Hispanic American surrogate and adviser to Mitt Romney's presidential campaign, said Sunday he was "shocked" by Romney's comments about President Obama giving "gifts" to minority groups.

“I was shocked. And frankly I don’t think that’s why Republicans lost the election," he said. “I think we lost the election because the far right of this party has taken the party to a place that it doesn’t belong.”

 

[rightwinger]

Romney was not popular in some districts....not surprising

 

[candycorn]

I suppose you realize that your argument only holds water if this is the FIRST time there was voter fraud. The only thing that makes the vote safe is those who work the polls, cheating, in my opinion, would be easy.

Uh no. The pattern suggests that 2012 was history repeating itself.

And that history could be of fraud, do you disagree?

Yes.

Because the Dems lost in 2000 and 2004. Maybe their fixer took those two years off?

Secondly because there isn't TTBOMK any case where a Romney voter has come forward with proof that their vote was not counted outside of the very few percentage points of irregularities that normally take place.

Thirdly because, again, the famous 59 precincts are 3.5% of the total number of precincts in Philly.

Fourth because it is not inconceiveable that a precinct in black neighborhood of 600-700 voters in total go all for Obama who is wildly popular as America's first black POTUS

 

[rightwinger]

In his famous 47% speech, Romney said there are certain people who would not vote for him regardless of what he does

Looks like he was right

 

[Cowman]

Your party will NEVER win another elections again.

Dude... No. Just no. You're setting yourself up for horrible disappointment. The citizens of this country are fickle bitches and they forget things quickly. It's very likely a republican might win the 2016 election, and they might win the 2014 elections.

REFERENDUMS DON'T FUCKING EXIST in this country.

The radical conservative members might not win another election(though also unlikely), but they still have some moderates and slightly more extreme individuals that could very well win.

It all depends on who they have pushing, and who we have pushing.

The conservatives said the same shit you're saying now, about democrats never winning an election again since 2010... and look where it got them.


Never say never.

 

[candycorn]

Your party will NEVER win another elections again.

Dude... No. Just no. You're setting yourself up for horrible disappointment. The citizens of this country are fickle bitches and they forget things quickly. It's very likely a republican might win the 2016 election, and they might win the 2014 elections.

REFERENDUMS DON'T FUCKING EXIST in this country.

The radical conservative members might not win another election(though also unlikely), but they still have some moderates and slightly more extreme individuals that could very well win.

It all depends on who they have pushing, and who we have pushing.

The conservatives said the same shit you're saying now, about democrats never winning an election again since 2010... and look where it got them.


Never say never.

The GOP will do very well in 2014

 

[boedicca]

Even the UN observers were shocked that we don't check ID to vote.

Fraud is the natural child of lack of a voter ID system.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If already posted, my apologies.

I really wasn't shocked at some of the claims of 'fraud' in PA, because of no votes for Romney. Weird things happen.

Saw this today, now this seems wrong:

Newsalert: In 37 Chicago Precincts, Romney Received No Votes

Saturday, November 17, 2012
In 37 Chicago Precincts, Romney Received No Votes
NBC Chicago reports:

The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that in 59 Philadelphia precincts, Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote. So Ward Room decided to look at the results in the president’s hometown, and see if he won as many shutouts here. The answer: no. Romney was rejected by every voter in only 37 Chicago precincts, an embarrassing result, given that segregation and Machine politics are two of our city’s most notable qualities.

Any doubt there was some vote fraud? Check out this comment on NBC Chicago's website:

In critical swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Illinois there are a lot of precincts in Philadelphia, Cleveland, and Chicago which reported 100% of their votes cast for Obama. These add up to many 10's of thousands of votes for Obama and 0 for Romney. I repeat, 0 for Romney. I have read a number of articles about this and people knowlegable in Political Science and Statistics are starting to take notice of this.Statistically, even if among 10's of thousands of voters all wanted to vote for Obama, it would not be possible to receive 100% of the vote because at least a few would make a mistake and vote incorrectly for Romney. Not to mention the fact that a least a few of those 10's of thousands might actually disagree with Obama. These types of election returns are only seen in countries run by dictators.

Just a reminder to those who want to get rid of the electoral college: corrupt Chicago voting practices could and would determine an election. Vote fraud occurs in Chicago because the U.S. Attorney doesn't want to conduct a simple investigation of those 37 precincts. Is there similar hand writing on any of those ballots ? Did any dead people vote ? Since Chicago lost 6.9% of its population in the 2010 Census : were any of those 37 precincts in the declining population wards? Maybe, if Chicago had a legitimate U.S. Attorney some of these questions would be answered. No word on this story from "alleged" former crime fighter and Obama "protector" Patrick Fitzgerald. Is Barack Obama and the U.S. Attorney's Office afraid of this milk story???
Posted by Steve Bartin

The right’s perception of ‘fraud’ is subjective and partisan; what they lack is objective, documented evidence.

 

[boedicca]

New Black Panthers in PA.

Now that's Fraud, with a capital F.

 

[francoHFW]

These are all black precincts, morons. And no voters are coming forward, though Fox etc would pay.

NBC polling couldn't find any blacks who wanted to vote for Romney. They can spot racist a-holes. LOL

 

[Zoom]

what makes it fraud is even on a fluke some retard would accidentally mark the wrong box or someone who doesn't see well, or a number of different reasons. Where theres fraud the dem always comes out on top.
Haven't seen anything to prove otherwise

Bush and florida had something to do with dems cheating?

Fucking get over it. YOu lost. BIG TIME. Worse than mccain. (Oh dear god, imagine if that nut was actually president.)

 

[Zoom]

These are all black precincts, morons. And no voters are coming forward, though Fox etc would pay.

NBC polling couldn't find any blacks who wanted to vote for Romney. They can spot racist a-holes. LOL

Why would you think blacks in Philly wouldn't want to vote for romney? Remember, its all about free stuff and Romney is all about giving away to the rich.

OH wait. I am getting a headache.

 

[francoHFW]

NBP? Change the channel, dupe.

 

[Clementine]

I was concerned that during early voting, at least two machines in two different states were automatically casting votes for Obama regardless of who people picked. Once it was discovered, it was passed off as a glitch and the media didn't make much of it. One lady stated that she kept redoing it and tried to vote for Romney, but it would change to Obama just as she was going to send it. She called one of the workers over and he nodded to another guy and, like magic, it worked. Makes me wonder how many people didn't even notice that. None of the votes should have been counted and everyone who had used the machines should have had to vote again. Stuff like that is very disturbing. Had it been the other way around, the media would have sounded the alarms and all voting across the country would have been stopped until they knew the problem was fixed.

We still use paper ballots and insert them into a machine when done. We have no idea if there are any such glitches in the machine because we can't if the vote is counted.

Cheating clearly is not difficult and if the ones cheating are the same ones overseeing the ballots, we'd have to rely on them to keep themselves honest.

I think that at all polls, there should be people from all parties overseeing everything- one Dem, one Repub and one Independent. That way, they'd keep each other honest.

 

[francoHFW]

Link to that BS?

 

[candycorn]

Even the UN observers were shocked that we don't check ID to vote.

Fraud is the natural child of lack of a voter ID system.

It is beyond comprehension that in 2012 we have people that A) cant get ID B) we buy that BS and C) allow them to vote without one. As I have told the cons...don't BS yourselves. Libs BS themselves on this issue.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Once we part, the Dem states can have their own elections rules.

In my lifetime, they've been stealing election since LBJ.

They are the Party of Tammany Hall and Daley Machine and they need their own country