1 year old baby killed in Brooklyn shooting. AOC says defund police now

aoc spock.jpg
 
Yesterday AOC was asked about the spike in crime in NYC...and her response was that basically people are desperate because of the economy and people are probably SHOPLIFTING THINGS LIKE BREAD to feed their children.

I am dead serious. That was her response. Completely ignoring or too ignorant to even realize the tremendous spike in violent crime. These people are flat out deranged lunatics. I really don't understand. How can she not denounce murder? How would it go against her "political base" if she denounced fathers being gunned down in broad daylight holding hands with their 3 year old daughter?

How do people like AOC get power and a platform? Oh that's right it must be white supremacy and oppression of people of color!
Just look at the progs on this board...That is how AOC gets elected....
 
Why did the police fail to protect the child?

What a dumb statement.

Police are reactive, not proactive. They can't do a damned thing till a crime has been committed.

Dumbass.
I will ask you why do you feel the need to insult a question in a so-called debate site.? Which it is true they are a reactive force and can't stop crime, which means they are only half usuful..
 
Why did the police fail to protect the child?

What a dumb statement.

Police are reactive, not proactive. They can't do a damned thing till a crime has been committed.

Dumbass.
He is thinking of Minority Report....Of course if that was the case, then George Floyd had intentions to kill the police, they just pre actively prevented that from happening....
 
Why did the police fail to protect the child?

~~~~~~~
You can't have it both ways.
To answer your question, You should be asking that question specifically to Mayor De Blasio aka Desgraciado. He has dismantled "Anti-Crime" and defunded the NYPD.
The mayor has done more to increase racism, crime and murder in New York and it's five boroughs than any other since 'Boss Tweed'
 
Last edited:
Why did the police fail to protect the child?

What a dumb statement.

Police are reactive, not proactive. They can't do a damned thing till a crime has been committed.

Dumbass.
He is thinking of Minority Report....Of course if that was the case, then George Floyd had intentions to kill the police, they just pre actively prevented that from happening....


Moonglow watches too much TV.. and lives in a fantasy world.......
 
Don't think of it as a one year old child being killed. It's a post birth abortion in the 7th trimester. Now you can be happy for the killer's exercise of rights.
 
Unless you are rich and connected the police feel no obligation whatsoever to protect you from anything.

To be fair, I don't feel that obligated to protect the rich either.

Bedstuy? ---there are no cops there. The cops stay away. Bullets fly all the time----and often hit childrens' heads. The head of a child is RELATIVELY large compared to the body and usually very close to the ground. A discharged bullet is subject to gravity. The baby was probably asleep in a stroller or baby seat----a very vulnerable position
 
Don't think of it as a one year old child being killed. It's a post birth abortion in the 7th trimester. Now you can be happy for the killer's exercise of rights.
It is not their right to kill anyone.


Yet you seem to condone these criminal actions....
Then repost a quote showing I condone such actions...


~~~~~~
You've been against anything related to Conservative and Republican politics in general, siding with Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Leftist ideology as exampled by the latest criminal actions of #Antifa and BLM.
Therefore it's proof enough to show you condone and agree with PMS/DSA Leftist ideology.
 
Why did the police fail to protect the child?
Police don’t prevent crime you dumb hack. They respond to crime.
Perhaps if the police stopped shooting unarmed black men for no reason?

defunding the police doesn’t mean no police, trumpkin. It means stop giving them so much that you have nothing for the things you really need.


The Cry is not "less funding" but "Defunding".

You libs have stated your position that the policies hunt down and just murder black people, cause "Wacism".

You libs have stated that you believe that the prisons are full of blacks, because of "wacism".


If you really believe that, then DEFUNDING, makes sense.


That you are trying to walk it back, indicates that you know your claims are bullshit.
I hope they keep this up. Anyone with a lick of sense doesn't want the police defunded. If they do keep it up, we will get the presidency and both houses!
 
Unless you are rich and connected the police feel no obligation whatsoever to protect you from anything.

To be fair, I don't feel that obligated to protect the rich either.

Bedstuy? ---there are no cops there. The cops stay away. Bullets fly all the time----and often hit childrens' heads. The head of a child is RELATIVELY large compared to the body and usually very close to the ground. A discharged bullet is subject to gravity. The baby was probably asleep in a stroller or baby seat----a very vulnerable position

for the record----for one year I lived right on edge of Bed-stuy and East NY with my then seven year old kid------I blocked the windows with furniture because I was concerned about stray bullets and his head. It's worse now -----BLM LAND
 
Why did the police fail to protect the child?
Police don’t prevent crime you dumb hack. They respond to crime.
Perhaps if the police stopped shooting unarmed black men for no reason?

defunding the police doesn’t mean no police, trumpkin. It means stop giving them so much that you have nothing for the things you really need.

The fuck are you babbling about?

In 2017 we spent $115 billion on police and $79 billion on corrections.


We spend SEVEN HUNDRED BILLION on education -


And over ONE TRILLION on welfare -


So for every $1 we spend on police, we spend $9 on all the SJW bullshit you stupid fucks claim will "fix the problem". Why hasn't it worked yet, dumbass? Do you really think that changing the ratio to $.50 -- $9.50 is going to make a lick of fucking difference?

Here's a thought - how about when a drug dealing junkie fuck like George Floyd gets picked up for holding a pregnant woman hostage at gunpoint while threatening to shoot her in the stomach, we lock his stupid ass up for the rest of his worthless life instead of letting the degenerate fuckwad back out onto the streets again? Ever think of that? Ever stop to think police interactions might be a bit more pleasant if they weren't jaded by constantly having to arrest the same recidivist assholes over and over and over again because some left-wing hack judge keeps releasing them?

Nah, that would just make too much goddamn sense, wouldn't it...
 
Why did the police fail to protect the child?
Police don’t prevent crime you dumb hack. They respond to crime.
Perhaps if the police stopped shooting unarmed black men for no reason?

defunding the police doesn’t mean no police, trumpkin. It means stop giving them so much that you have nothing for the things you really need.


The Cry is not "less funding" but "Defunding".

You libs have stated your position that the policies hunt down and just murder black people, cause "Wacism".

You libs have stated that you believe that the prisons are full of blacks, because of "wacism".


If you really believe that, then DEFUNDING, makes sense.


That you are trying to walk it back, indicates that you know your claims are bullshit.
I hope they keep this up. Anyone with a lick of sense doesn't want the police defunded. If they do keep it up, we will get the presidency and both houses!


i plan to viciously ridicule any lib that talks shit about the police murdering blacks, or arresting them, for being black.


and then wants to keep paying them to keep doing that.


They talk shit, but when it comes time to actually walk the walk, they show what pussies they are.
 

Forum List

Back
Top