Why did the police fail to protect the child?
What a dumb statement.
Police are reactive, not proactive. They can't do a damned thing till a crime has been committed.
Dumbass.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why did the police fail to protect the child?
Just look at the progs on this board...That is how AOC gets elected....Yesterday AOC was asked about the spike in crime in NYC...and her response was that basically people are desperate because of the economy and people are probably SHOPLIFTING THINGS LIKE BREAD to feed their children.
I am dead serious. That was her response. Completely ignoring or too ignorant to even realize the tremendous spike in violent crime. These people are flat out deranged lunatics. I really don't understand. How can she not denounce murder? How would it go against her "political base" if she denounced fathers being gunned down in broad daylight holding hands with their 3 year old daughter?
How do people like AOC get power and a platform? Oh that's right it must be white supremacy and oppression of people of color!
I will ask you why do you feel the need to insult a question in a so-called debate site.? Which it is true they are a reactive force and can't stop crime, which means they are only half usuful..Why did the police fail to protect the child?
What a dumb statement.
Police are reactive, not proactive. They can't do a damned thing till a crime has been committed.
Dumbass.
He is thinking of Minority Report....Of course if that was the case, then George Floyd had intentions to kill the police, they just pre actively prevented that from happening....Why did the police fail to protect the child?
What a dumb statement.
Police are reactive, not proactive. They can't do a damned thing till a crime has been committed.
Dumbass.
Why did the police fail to protect the child?
He is thinking of Minority Report....Of course if that was the case, then George Floyd had intentions to kill the police, they just pre actively prevented that from happening....Why did the police fail to protect the child?
What a dumb statement.
Police are reactive, not proactive. They can't do a damned thing till a crime has been committed.
Dumbass.
It is not their right to kill anyone.Don't think of it as a one year old child being killed. It's a post birth abortion in the 7th trimester. Now you can be happy for the killer's exercise of rights.
It is not their right to kill anyone.Don't think of it as a one year old child being killed. It's a post birth abortion in the 7th trimester. Now you can be happy for the killer's exercise of rights.
Then repost a quote showing I condone such actions...It is not their right to kill anyone.Don't think of it as a one year old child being killed. It's a post birth abortion in the 7th trimester. Now you can be happy for the killer's exercise of rights.
Yet you seem to condone these criminal actions....
Unless you are rich and connected the police feel no obligation whatsoever to protect you from anything.
To be fair, I don't feel that obligated to protect the rich either.
They can't . I was using reverse logic on the OP. Cops being defunded will have no different effect upon the occurrence that occurred had they been funded.I didn't notice the police were there. How could they protect her if they weren't there?Why did the police fail to protect the child?
Then repost a quote showing I condone such actions...It is not their right to kill anyone.Don't think of it as a one year old child being killed. It's a post birth abortion in the 7th trimester. Now you can be happy for the killer's exercise of rights.
Yet you seem to condone these criminal actions....
I hope they keep this up. Anyone with a lick of sense doesn't want the police defunded. If they do keep it up, we will get the presidency and both houses!Police don’t prevent crime you dumb hack. They respond to crime.Why did the police fail to protect the child?
Perhaps if the police stopped shooting unarmed black men for no reason?
defunding the police doesn’t mean no police, trumpkin. It means stop giving them so much that you have nothing for the things you really need.
The Cry is not "less funding" but "Defunding".
You libs have stated your position that the policies hunt down and just murder black people, cause "Wacism".
You libs have stated that you believe that the prisons are full of blacks, because of "wacism".
If you really believe that, then DEFUNDING, makes sense.
That you are trying to walk it back, indicates that you know your claims are bullshit.
Unless you are rich and connected the police feel no obligation whatsoever to protect you from anything.
To be fair, I don't feel that obligated to protect the rich either.
Bedstuy? ---there are no cops there. The cops stay away. Bullets fly all the time----and often hit childrens' heads. The head of a child is RELATIVELY large compared to the body and usually very close to the ground. A discharged bullet is subject to gravity. The baby was probably asleep in a stroller or baby seat----a very vulnerable position
Exactly. If cops no longer exist, the crime rate will only increase.And ten times more will die nowPeople die when police are at full force and deployed.
Police don’t prevent crime you dumb hack. They respond to crime.Why did the police fail to protect the child?
Perhaps if the police stopped shooting unarmed black men for no reason?
defunding the police doesn’t mean no police, trumpkin. It means stop giving them so much that you have nothing for the things you really need.
I hope they keep this up. Anyone with a lick of sense doesn't want the police defunded. If they do keep it up, we will get the presidency and both houses!Police don’t prevent crime you dumb hack. They respond to crime.Why did the police fail to protect the child?
Perhaps if the police stopped shooting unarmed black men for no reason?
defunding the police doesn’t mean no police, trumpkin. It means stop giving them so much that you have nothing for the things you really need.
The Cry is not "less funding" but "Defunding".
You libs have stated your position that the policies hunt down and just murder black people, cause "Wacism".
You libs have stated that you believe that the prisons are full of blacks, because of "wacism".
If you really believe that, then DEFUNDING, makes sense.
That you are trying to walk it back, indicates that you know your claims are bullshit.