While most observers view the “Okinawa Problem” as one of U.S. military bases, it actually involves the colonial history of the Ryukyu islands and the…Continue readingThe Okinawa Problem: The Forgotten History of Japanese Colonialism and Ryukyuan Indigeneity
www.risingpowersinitiative.org
Wow, thank you for confirming that suicide is a growing problem in Japan.
Now excuse me as I am still laughing my ass off, as you just thoughtlessly vomited up some random clip and did not analysis or actual thinking yourself when you did so. But here, for those that do have a brain and actually read data, this is quite telling.
The number of suicides in Japan in 2021 totaled 21,007, a decrease of 74 (0.4%) compared with 2020.
Wow, a huge decrease, 0.4%! That is what, a decrease of 4 in 1,000? Honestly, I do not even think I could take that amount seriously, it seems more like the expected annual deviation as opposed to anything that was actually done to solve the problem.
But then you have the very next line.
The number of suicides per 100,000 people rose by 0.1 to 16.8.
So in other words, it actually went up slightly. As a percentage it went down, in per 100k of population it actually increased. With suicides among the young (20 and under) and elderly (over 50) showing sharp increases.
So you see Poopy, there is much more involved than just vomiting up something that you think shows you are right, you need to actually analyze the information. You simply glommed onto the completely insignificant statistic about 0.4%, and apparently put zero thought into actually considering what that meant. In looking at the data, the suicide rate is still on the rise, and even more disturbingly the rate for those under 20 is increasing again. Which that article rather cleverly attempted to hide.
The year also saw the second highest number of cases of school students, after 2020, with 473 taking their own lives.
OK, now that sentence is a real wonder, since it was written to cover the 2021 year. But think on it, second highest since 2020, and that literally covers two years. I wonder how many even realize that the "second highest" is one of only two years in the time period they themselves laid out? That is the difference between actually analyzing data, and just vomiting it up and thinking it means something.
So once again, thank you for proving I am right, Poopy.