CDZ Zoophilia and Necrophilia

Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by Onyx, Oct 5, 2016.

  1. Onyx
    Offline

    Onyx Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Messages:
    7,888
    Thanks Received:
    496
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +3,087
    Just in case you did not already know, Zoophilia is a sexual fixation on another species besides your own, while Necrophilia is a sexual fixation with dead bodies.

    I have no problems with either of these sexual attractions as fetishes, but I do have issues with acting on each. For Bestiality, there is the question of how another species could consent to sex. With Necrophilia, there is the question of the sanctity of the dead.

    I have heard unique arguments from each, as I have personally known advocates for both.

    For the Zoophile I knew, who was very intelligent and articulate, argued that an animal could consent to sex, and referenced times in nature when two different species would have sex with each other.

    I knew a supporter of Necrophillia (not a necrophiliac), who claimed that if a living person consented to being used for sexual purposes after death, then the act of having sex with their corpse could be justified. He argued that there could be Necrophile clubs where necrophiliacs could have sex with medically preserved corpses, which I found to be an interesting argument.

    Anyways, discuss....
     
  2. Tipsycatlover
    Online

    Tipsycatlover Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    13,674
    Thanks Received:
    2,334
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +16,148
    If one perverted sexual orientation is legal, they should all be legal. Some animals that have been raped have to be euthanized they are too badly injured to survive. So perhaps that should not be legal.

    Sex robots will fix it all.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Onyx
    Offline

    Onyx Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Messages:
    7,888
    Thanks Received:
    496
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +3,087
    Sexual orientation refers to attraction and not action. Therefore no sexual orientations are illegal, because doing so would be in violation of the first amendment of the constitution of the United States of America.
     
  4. Lucy Hamilton
    Offline

    Lucy Hamilton Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2015
    Messages:
    23,356
    Thanks Received:
    5,554
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Ratings:
    +34,541
    "Zoophilia is a sexual fixation on another species besides your own, while Necrophilia is a sexual fixation with dead bodies."

    What are we meant to discuss?

    My response to Zoophilia is no, my response to Necrophilia is no.

    People who indulge in such unnatural and disturbing things IMHO have psychological problems and need professional help.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. Onyx
    Offline

    Onyx Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Messages:
    7,888
    Thanks Received:
    496
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +3,087
    They have sexual attractions that they cannot control that are different than our "normal" selves. The attraction is separate of the action.

    The action is a topic I am willing to discuss. The only question that needs to be asked in regards to sexual relations is mutual consent. If one side cannot properly consent, then I am against it. If both sides can mutually consent, then it is of no consequence to anybody.
     
  6. BULLDOG
    Offline

    BULLDOG Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2014
    Messages:
    34,111
    Thanks Received:
    4,259
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +20,588
    When I was a teenager, I would have had sex with a knot hole in a pine tree if I had thought I could get away with it.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. Onyx
    Offline

    Onyx Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Messages:
    7,888
    Thanks Received:
    496
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +3,087
    Treephilia?

    :wtf:
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. Lucy Hamilton
    Offline

    Lucy Hamilton Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2015
    Messages:
    23,356
    Thanks Received:
    5,554
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Ratings:
    +34,541
    "The only question that needs to be asked in regards to sexual relations is mutual consent. If one side cannot properly consent, then I am against it. If both sides can mutually consent, then it is of no consequence to anybody."

    As no animal can give consent to someone having sex with it, as no corpse can give consent to someone having sex with it, then of course you then must be against?


     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. Onyx
    Offline

    Onyx Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Messages:
    7,888
    Thanks Received:
    496
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +3,087
    I believe there is no way of knowing if an animal can consent, although the one Zoophile I knew claimed that there was.

    What if someone consented to be used for necrophiliac sex acts before death? Like how some individuals give their bodies for medical research, except these people would be paid money.

    It is a better alternative to having necrophiles raid cemeteries and kill people to have sex with.
     
  10. Lucy Hamilton
    Offline

    Lucy Hamilton Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2015
    Messages:
    23,356
    Thanks Received:
    5,554
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Ratings:
    +34,541
    With all due respect Onyx, I'll leave this thread to others now who might like to comment, I'm just uncomfortable with these two subjects that I feel are beyond depraved and very disturbing and would prefer not to get in-depth with either of them.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

necrophiliac