- Jan 8, 2011
- 66,024
- 35,094
- 2,605
Lol. Total dupe of the establishment.The group is murderous, bloodthirsty terrorists bound by religious obligation to kill all Jews then infidels. Seems like that's the group practicing genocide.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Lol. Total dupe of the establishment.The group is murderous, bloodthirsty terrorists bound by religious obligation to kill all Jews then infidels. Seems like that's the group practicing genocide.
For sure, plus he’s an asshole.You are a Holocaust Denier while the Holocaust of the Palestinians is ongoing as we speak.
Still not genocide.
see, here's the thing -- the website you listed uses the word "genocide" in its title as if that was what the poll dealt with. But it didn't. According to the poll, a majority of those polled disapprove of Israel's military action. The gallup poll does not mention "genocide." That's a label inappropriately attached by the writer of the article.I'm afraid that loyal Americans disagree:
"The Majority of Americans Now Disapprove of Israel’s Genocide, Polling Finds"
The Majority of Americans Now Disapprove of Israel’s Genocide, Polling Finds
Approval for Israel’s attack on Gaza has plummeted by 14 percent since November.truthout.org
EXCERPT "New polling finds that the majority of the American public now say that they disapprove of Israel’s genocidal siege of Gaza. Approval of the assault has plummeted over the course of a few months as Israel slaughtered at least 33,000 Palestinians and continues its destruction of Gaza with impunity.
According to a Gallup survey conducted last month, 55 percent of Americans say that they disapprove of Israel’s “military action” in Gaza — up from a minority of 45 percent in a November Gallup poll." CONTINUED
see, here's the thing -- the website you listed uses the word "genocide" in its title as if that was what the poll dealt with. But it didn't. According to the poll, a majority of those polled disapprove of Israel's military action. The gallup poll does not mention "genocide." That's a label inappropriately attached by the writer of the article.
Also, the website lists a poll from late March so the "now" should be contextualized. Clearly it is an older article because it includes the "slaughtered at least 33,000" claim which has now been revealed to represent more terrorists and half as many women and children and to include over 11,000 people for whom no one has a name or other corroborating information to prove they existed, let alone died. This would, of course, argue against genocide.
So since you are citing an old website that misrepresents its source poll and uses outdated data, you might want to contemporize.
Yes. I'm not sure what your culture teaches about names and death, but in my culture, even after you are dead, you have a name.Are you surprised that the dead have no names?
Yes. I'm not sure what your culture teaches about names and death, but in my culture, even after you are dead, you have a name.
Or are you wondering whether I am accustomed to situations in which only people who were never given names are the only ones killed. I have not heard of that particular coincidence before. Amazing that it happens here!
so a UN claim from 1998 is supposed to contribute to what I said how exactly?Israel strips Lebanese soil, says UN
An Israeli civilian construction firm has been stripping topsoil from southern Lebanon and transporting it across the border …www.irishtimes.com
so a UN claim from 1998 is supposed to contribute to what I said how exactly?
oh look -- an irrelevant article from 1980. Clearly, we are no longer talking about names in 2024, or even soil in 1998. Do you ever address a single topic and follow up with relevant and supporting information or do you just jump around to whatever you feel like you want to post even if it is completely unrelated? Seems like the latter.
This in turn worried the Israelis. "The situation along the borders has never been so calm," Dayan complained privately to a journalist friend who reported it to Sharett on April 4. A new and more subtle strategy of covert aggression was thereupon introduced by the Israeli army. Its aim was to bypass both the Arab security arrangements and Sharett's reluctance to authorize attacks across the border.
Small patrols were infiltrated into the West Bank and Gaza with precise directives to clash with isolated Egyptian or Jordanian military patrols, or to penetrate into villages and commit acts of sabotage or murder. Invariably, each such action was later falsely described by an official announcement as having occurred inside Israeli territory. Once attacked, the military spokesman would explain, the patrol proceeded to pursue the aggressors into enemy territory.
Almost daily actions of this kind, carried out mainly by Arik Sharon's special paratroops, caused a great number of casualties.
Here is a more recent poll for you to reviewI'm afraid that loyal Americans disagree:
"The Majority of Americans Now Disapprove of Israel’s Genocide, Polling Finds"
The Majority of Americans Now Disapprove of Israel’s Genocide, Polling Finds
Approval for Israel’s attack on Gaza has plummeted by 14 percent since November.truthout.org
EXCERPT "New polling finds that the majority of the American public now say that they disapprove of Israel’s genocidal siege of Gaza. Approval of the assault has plummeted over the course of a few months as Israel slaughtered at least 33,000 Palestinians and continues its destruction of Gaza with impunity.
According to a Gallup survey conducted last month, 55 percent of Americans say that they disapprove of Israel’s “military action” in Gaza — up from a minority of 45 percent in a November Gallup poll." CONTINUED
You would think that Egypt would open their border and take in all the refugees, yet they don't and somehow everyone blames Israel. Convenient.There is genocide in Gaza.
You would think that Egypt would open their border and take in all the refugees, yet they don't and somehow everyone blames Israel. Convenient.
oh look -- an irrelevant article from 1980. Clearly, we are no longer talking about names in 2024, or even soil in 1998. Do you ever address a single topic and follow up with relevant and supporting information or do you just jump around to whatever you feel like you want to post even if it is completely unrelated? Seems like the latter.