Zimbabwe. What can do blacks without whites?

[frigidweirdo]

Sorry guys, but Rhodesia was one of the most prosperous states in the world. Like South Africa and other ruined by blacks countries.Probably it would be racist, but the sad reality is no one African country can be effectively run without whites. As exception can be some former colonies like Kenya or Angola where presence of whites as advisors, engineers, physicians, attorneys etc. is until now very strong.
The point is when blacks ruin their countries why 'bad whites' must pay for it.Blacks shall feed their folks by themselves and forget to ask 'bad racist whites' for help.

Zimbabwe: Deadline for Mugabe to resign passes - CNN

Take off your sheet and hood for a minute and try to learn something.
History of Colonialism in Rhodesia

Colonialism is always the cue point for libs. Funny how many conquered people form prosperous nations after receiving independence. 2,000 years from now, Africa will still blame colonialism for their failure.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Funny how there are plenty of African nations that are getting on with it that you lot have no fucking clue about.

Do you Zambia? Used to be part of the British Rhodesia. It's doing okay.

The problems it has are generally down to the problems that the geography gives it.

When I was in Lusaka I went to the city fair with an Australian dairy farmer who was volunteering there. He was looking for funding so that he could help dairy farmers.

Basically the western cows that produce a lot of milk in the West, don't produce much milk in Africa because the grass isn't suitable for them to exist there. The cows native to the area don't produce much milk because they have adapted to the grass of the region. This particular dairy farmer wanted to try and get cows that produced more milk, the problem is that the milk gets produced because of what goes into the cow, and the land is harsh.

So, with food always going to be a struggle because a lot of African soil isn't that great for farming.

Their main exports are from mining, 25% of which go to China. Copper makes up 65% of their exports.

The country is always going to be poorer because it really doesn't have the food security that is required to allow a lot of people to enter the non-agricultural workforce.

Agriculture is 20% of GDP and 85% of employment in the country. It take 85% of people to produce food in order for people to live.

In the US it's 1.5% and the US produces more than enough food.

That's the difference here.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Zimbabwe tryin' to make a comeback...

Zimbabwe's Ruling Party Hopes for Economic Turnaround
December 19, 2017 - Less than a month after a military intervention forced longtime leader Robert Mugabe to step down, new leaders of the ruling ZANU-PF party have big plans for Zimbabwe.

Retired General Sibusiso Moyo announced the military takeover on November 15 and has been appointed to serve as foreign minister. He sees opportunities to revive Zimbabwe’s struggling economy. “Our primary interest at the moment is economic development and emancipation of our people,” Moyo told VOA’s Zimbabwe Service. Zimbabwe's long-ailing economy will recover, according to Moyo, through direct foreign investment, tourism and exports to worldwide markets. ZANU-PF hopes to jump-start the economy by collaborating with Zimbabweans in the diaspora and creating a more appealing environment for investment. “We are opening up to all our friends,” Moyo said.

‘Zimbabwe isn’t poor’

The ruling party is right to focus on Zimbabwe’s economy as it defines its post-Mugabe platform, according to Chipo Dendere, a visiting assistant professor of political science at Amherst College in Massachusetts. But to truly open up, the country must come to terms with endemic corruption. “Zimbabwe isn’t poor,” Dendere told VOA, speaking over the phone from Harare. In fact, the country is endowed with valuable minerals such as gold, diamonds and platinum. But, Dendere said, the wealth has been stolen. During Mugabe’s regime, he and his allies stole more than $2 billion in diamond revenue, according to Partnership Africa Canada (PAC), a group tracking mismanagement of global natural resources.

Zimbabwe's President, Emmerson Mnangagwa, speaks during the Extraordinary Congress of the ruling ZANU-PF party in Harare, Zimbabwe​

So far, the government seems to be putting pressure on officials to bring back money, according to Dendere. But with so many people who have stolen, it's unclear how the government will serve a greater good without violating human rights or falling into partisan traps. “If the government fails to deal with the economic challenges, then Zimbabwe is going to be in great disarray,” Dendere said. Fixing Zimbabwe’s economy begins with addressing its many infrastructure problems, such as pothole-ridden roads and an aging and leaky water system.

Real change?

Some, including Dendere, remain skeptical that ZANU-PF will enact real change. “It’s one thing to be excited about a new government. But I think people need to be cognizant of the fact that the people that are in power right now ... are the same people that have been in power for the last 37 years,” Dendere said. The government has not, in fact, changed, Moyo conceded, but it will do things differently with new personalities in power. Dendere, meanwhile, questions what’s new. The ideology for the ruling party is unlikely to change, she said, based on language used at the party congress this month.

A security employee guards a diamond-processing plant in the diamond-rich eastern Marange region of Zimbabwe​

Still, Moyo sees opportunities for dialogue and improvement. “We are not a government of a party. We are a government of all the people of Zimbabwe. And therefore, when there are issues which need dialogue, they must be discussed in house,” Moyo said. For Dendere, aspects of ZANU-PF’s legacy are, in fact, worthwhile. “This is the legacy that brought us independence, the end of colonialism. But it’s also the legacy that gave a lot of power to one party and the centralization and consolidation of power around the president and the people that are closest to him.”

Space for opposition

My guess is same corruption, just a different leader.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Just like the US then?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Sorry guys, but Rhodesia was one of the most prosperous states in the world. Like South Africa and other ruined by blacks countries.Probably it would be racist, but the sad reality is no one African country can be effectively run without whites. As exception can be some former colonies like Kenya or Angola where presence of whites as advisors, engineers, physicians, attorneys etc. is until now very strong.
The point is when blacks ruin their countries why 'bad whites' must pay for it.Blacks shall feed their folks by themselves and forget to ask 'bad racist whites' for help.

Zimbabwe: Deadline for Mugabe to resign passes - CNN

Take off your sheet and hood for a minute and try to learn something.
History of Colonialism in Rhodesia

Colonialism is always the cue point for libs. Funny how many conquered people form prosperous nations after receiving independence. 2,000 years from now, Africa will still blame colonialism for their failure.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

According to Liberal logic, Ireland should be poorer than Ethiopia.

Because Britain conquered, and abused Ireland.

But, Ethiopia was not colonized.

 

[harmonica]

Without whites blacks actually do an excellent job of slaughtering each other in large numbers. Always for the stupidest reasons. Even in America our blacks have a perfect track record of murdering each other whenever the newest Nike Air Jordan hits the stories.

Who's better at slaughtering each other in large numbers, whites or blacks?

blacks murder at a much, much higher rate than whites--well over 4 times the rate
the Hutus slaughtered more in a much smaller amount of time than the Holocaust in WW2....more of the Hutu population participated in the direct killings per capita

So you're cherry picking again?

There have been times when whites have also committed mass slaughter in a small space of time.

These 15 Horrifying Massacres From Human History Will Destroy Your Faith In Mankind

The massacre in Rwanda was brutal, but no more brutal than other brutal massacres.

Your argument is as weak as hot water posing as tea. You're pulling facts out of your ass and then trying to show that this one fact represents the whole of a continent while ignoring other facts from other places.

This isn't debate.

in the US, right now--blacks commit murder at a much higher rate--are you afraid of the truth?? over FOUR times the rate of whites
cherry picking?? hahahhahahahahhaah
obviously the whites are more intelligent and are ''better'' at slaughtering--but that doesn't mean they are more violent, etc
the blacks are still using medieval weapons to slaughter, as they did in Rwanda

as a group, per capita, the blacks murder more.....

According to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, in the year 2008 black youths, who make up 16% of the youth population, accounted for 52% of juvenile violent crime arrests, including 58.5% of youth arrests for homicide and 67% for robbery. Black youths were overrepresented in all offense categories except DUI, liquor laws and drunkenness

look at these numbers!!!!!! OMG
Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

 

[harmonica]

Without whites blacks actually do an excellent job of slaughtering each other in large numbers. Always for the stupidest reasons. Even in America our blacks have a perfect track record of murdering each other whenever the newest Nike Air Jordan hits the stories.

Who's better at slaughtering each other in large numbers, whites or blacks?

blacks murder at a much, much higher rate than whites--well over 4 times the rate
the Hutus slaughtered more in a much smaller amount of time than the Holocaust in WW2....more of the Hutu population participated in the direct killings per capita

So you're cherry picking again?

There have been times when whites have also committed mass slaughter in a small space of time.

These 15 Horrifying Massacres From Human History Will Destroy Your Faith In Mankind

The massacre in Rwanda was brutal, but no more brutal than other brutal massacres.

Your argument is as weak as hot water posing as tea. You're pulling facts out of your ass and then trying to show that this one fact represents the whole of a continent while ignoring other facts from other places.

This isn't debate.

Expanded Homicide Data Table 6

 

[frigidweirdo]

Without whites blacks actually do an excellent job of slaughtering each other in large numbers. Always for the stupidest reasons. Even in America our blacks have a perfect track record of murdering each other whenever the newest Nike Air Jordan hits the stories.

Who's better at slaughtering each other in large numbers, whites or blacks?

blacks murder at a much, much higher rate than whites--well over 4 times the rate
the Hutus slaughtered more in a much smaller amount of time than the Holocaust in WW2....more of the Hutu population participated in the direct killings per capita

So you're cherry picking again?

There have been times when whites have also committed mass slaughter in a small space of time.

These 15 Horrifying Massacres From Human History Will Destroy Your Faith In Mankind

The massacre in Rwanda was brutal, but no more brutal than other brutal massacres.

Your argument is as weak as hot water posing as tea. You're pulling facts out of your ass and then trying to show that this one fact represents the whole of a continent while ignoring other facts from other places.

This isn't debate.

in the US, right now--blacks commit murder at a much higher rate--are you afraid of the truth?? over FOUR times the rate of whites
cherry picking?? hahahhahahahahhaah
obviously the whites are more intelligent and are ''better'' at slaughtering--but that doesn't mean they are more violent, etc
the blacks are still using medieval weapons to slaughter, as they did in Rwanda

as a group, per capita, the blacks murder more.....

According to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, in the year 2008 black youths, who make up 16% of the youth population, accounted for 52% of juvenile violent crime arrests, including 58.5% of youth arrests for homicide and 67% for robbery. Black youths were overrepresented in all offense categories except DUI, liquor laws and drunkenness

look at these numbers!!!!!! OMG
Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

Yes, they do. Am I afraid of the truth? No. I'm afraid of people making arguments by using cherry picked facts out of context.

You say "cherry picking?? hahahahahahahahahaah" and yet, you didn't bring this fact up.

Now, why do black people commit more crimes, and more murders in the US? Is it because they're black? Or is it because of the history of the US black people have been sent to the bottom of the pile and left to rot by society?

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/480250/bulletin.pdf

If you look at figure 1.01 Ethnicity proportions throughout the CJS, 2014 you'll see that in the UK black people also commit a lot more crimes than white people. But they make up much more of the prison population than the number of arrests and the like.

Figure 3.01 shows that they're 50% more likely to be victims of crime too.

Poverty rates among ethnic groups in Great Britain

Black Africans have a 45% poverty rate compared to 30% for black Caribbeans and 20% for white people. So, poverty is higher, crime is higher.

Figure 4.02 shows population distribution and black people are far more likely to live in London. Nearly 60% of black people live in London. Nearly 80% of stop and searches on blacks are in London. 60% of these stop and searches are to do with drugs.

Figure 4.09 shows that black's highest crime is robbery, an economic crime along with drug dealing. Fraud is second, drugs are third. This is where a lot of people in poverty commit crimes, crime in order to enrich themselves.

The more you dig, the more you find out it's not just about someone being black for the reason why they commit crimes.

But you don't want to dig.

The countries with the most crime in the world, don't have large black populations. Like Honduras.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Without whites blacks actually do an excellent job of slaughtering each other in large numbers. Always for the stupidest reasons. Even in America our blacks have a perfect track record of murdering each other whenever the newest Nike Air Jordan hits the stories.

Who's better at slaughtering each other in large numbers, whites or blacks?

blacks murder at a much, much higher rate than whites--well over 4 times the rate
the Hutus slaughtered more in a much smaller amount of time than the Holocaust in WW2....more of the Hutu population participated in the direct killings per capita

So you're cherry picking again?

There have been times when whites have also committed mass slaughter in a small space of time.

These 15 Horrifying Massacres From Human History Will Destroy Your Faith In Mankind

The massacre in Rwanda was brutal, but no more brutal than other brutal massacres.

Your argument is as weak as hot water posing as tea. You're pulling facts out of your ass and then trying to show that this one fact represents the whole of a continent while ignoring other facts from other places.

This isn't debate.

Expanded Homicide Data Table 6

Wow, you've post a link that I'm not going to look at because you've not posted anything else.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Sorry guys, but Rhodesia was one of the most prosperous states in the world. Like South Africa and other ruined by blacks countries.Probably it would be racist, but the sad reality is no one African country can be effectively run without whites. As exception can be some former colonies like Kenya or Angola where presence of whites as advisors, engineers, physicians, attorneys etc. is until now very strong.
The point is when blacks ruin their countries why 'bad whites' must pay for it.Blacks shall feed their folks by themselves and forget to ask 'bad racist whites' for help.

Zimbabwe: Deadline for Mugabe to resign passes - CNN

Take off your sheet and hood for a minute and try to learn something.
History of Colonialism in Rhodesia

Colonialism is always the cue point for libs. Funny how many conquered people form prosperous nations after receiving independence. 2,000 years from now, Africa will still blame colonialism for their failure.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

According to Liberal logic, Ireland should be poorer than Ethiopia.

Because Britain conquered, and abused Ireland.

But, Ethiopia was not colonized.

Er... that's not liberal logic, that's YOUR simple logic.

The problem is, when liberals try their hardest to keep things simple so you can understand them, you suddenly say "but you didn't talk about the Superbowl final in 1932, therefore you must be ignoring it", so then the liberal writes a 1,000 word reply thinking this is what you want, and then you bitch and moan that it's more than one sentence and you can't cope with more than one sentence.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Sorry guys, but Rhodesia was one of the most prosperous states in the world. Like South Africa and other ruined by blacks countries.Probably it would be racist, but the sad reality is no one African country can be effectively run without whites. As exception can be some former colonies like Kenya or Angola where presence of whites as advisors, engineers, physicians, attorneys etc. is until now very strong.
The point is when blacks ruin their countries why 'bad whites' must pay for it.Blacks shall feed their folks by themselves and forget to ask 'bad racist whites' for help.

Zimbabwe: Deadline for Mugabe to resign passes - CNN

Take off your sheet and hood for a minute and try to learn something.
History of Colonialism in Rhodesia

Colonialism is always the cue point for libs. Funny how many conquered people form prosperous nations after receiving independence. 2,000 years from now, Africa will still blame colonialism for their failure.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

According to Liberal logic, Ireland should be poorer than Ethiopia.

Because Britain conquered, and abused Ireland.

But, Ethiopia was not colonized.

Er... that's not liberal logic, that's YOUR simple logic.

The problem is, when liberals try their hardest to keep things simple so you can understand them, you suddenly say "but you didn't talk about the Superbowl final in 1932, therefore you must be ignoring it", so then the liberal writes a 1,000 word reply thinking this is what you want, and then you bitch and moan that it's more than one sentence and you can't cope with more than one sentence.

]

Off topic babbling because obviously I'm right.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Sorry guys, but Rhodesia was one of the most prosperous states in the world. Like South Africa and other ruined by blacks countries.Probably it would be racist, but the sad reality is no one African country can be effectively run without whites. As exception can be some former colonies like Kenya or Angola where presence of whites as advisors, engineers, physicians, attorneys etc. is until now very strong.
The point is when blacks ruin their countries why 'bad whites' must pay for it.Blacks shall feed their folks by themselves and forget to ask 'bad racist whites' for help.

Zimbabwe: Deadline for Mugabe to resign passes - CNN

Take off your sheet and hood for a minute and try to learn something.
History of Colonialism in Rhodesia

Colonialism is always the cue point for libs. Funny how many conquered people form prosperous nations after receiving independence. 2,000 years from now, Africa will still blame colonialism for their failure.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

According to Liberal logic, Ireland should be poorer than Ethiopia.

Because Britain conquered, and abused Ireland.

But, Ethiopia was not colonized.

Er... that's not liberal logic, that's YOUR simple logic.

The problem is, when liberals try their hardest to keep things simple so you can understand them, you suddenly say "but you didn't talk about the Superbowl final in 1932, therefore you must be ignoring it", so then the liberal writes a 1,000 word reply thinking this is what you want, and then you bitch and moan that it's more than one sentence and you can't cope with more than one sentence.

]

Off topic babbling because obviously I'm right.

Not at all. I can give you plenty of reasons why things are different.

 

[harmonica]

Without whites blacks actually do an excellent job of slaughtering each other in large numbers. Always for the stupidest reasons. Even in America our blacks have a perfect track record of murdering each other whenever the newest Nike Air Jordan hits the stories.

Who's better at slaughtering each other in large numbers, whites or blacks?

blacks murder at a much, much higher rate than whites--well over 4 times the rate
the Hutus slaughtered more in a much smaller amount of time than the Holocaust in WW2....more of the Hutu population participated in the direct killings per capita

So you're cherry picking again?

There have been times when whites have also committed mass slaughter in a small space of time.

These 15 Horrifying Massacres From Human History Will Destroy Your Faith In Mankind

The massacre in Rwanda was brutal, but no more brutal than other brutal massacres.

Your argument is as weak as hot water posing as tea. You're pulling facts out of your ass and then trying to show that this one fact represents the whole of a continent while ignoring other facts from other places.

This isn't debate.

Expanded Homicide Data Table 6

Wow, you've post a link that I'm not going to look at because you've not posted anything else.

??

 

[miketx]

Classic examples of how regressives root for failure and cannot be told the truth.

 

[harmonica]

Without whites blacks actually do an excellent job of slaughtering each other in large numbers. Always for the stupidest reasons. Even in America our blacks have a perfect track record of murdering each other whenever the newest Nike Air Jordan hits the stories.

Who's better at slaughtering each other in large numbers, whites or blacks?

blacks murder at a much, much higher rate than whites--well over 4 times the rate
the Hutus slaughtered more in a much smaller amount of time than the Holocaust in WW2....more of the Hutu population participated in the direct killings per capita

So you're cherry picking again?

There have been times when whites have also committed mass slaughter in a small space of time.

These 15 Horrifying Massacres From Human History Will Destroy Your Faith In Mankind

The massacre in Rwanda was brutal, but no more brutal than other brutal massacres.

Your argument is as weak as hot water posing as tea. You're pulling facts out of your ass and then trying to show that this one fact represents the whole of a continent while ignoring other facts from other places.

This isn't debate.

in the US, right now--blacks commit murder at a much higher rate--are you afraid of the truth?? over FOUR times the rate of whites
cherry picking?? hahahhahahahahhaah
obviously the whites are more intelligent and are ''better'' at slaughtering--but that doesn't mean they are more violent, etc
the blacks are still using medieval weapons to slaughter, as they did in Rwanda

as a group, per capita, the blacks murder more.....

According to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, in the year 2008 black youths, who make up 16% of the youth population, accounted for 52% of juvenile violent crime arrests, including 58.5% of youth arrests for homicide and 67% for robbery. Black youths were overrepresented in all offense categories except DUI, liquor laws and drunkenness

look at these numbers!!!!!! OMG
Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

Yes, they do. Am I afraid of the truth? No. I'm afraid of people making arguments by using cherry picked facts out of context.

You say "cherry picking?? hahahahahahahahahaah" and yet, you didn't bring this fact up.

Now, why do black people commit more crimes, and more murders in the US? Is it because they're black? Or is it because of the history of the US black people have been sent to the bottom of the pile and left to rot by society?

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/480250/bulletin.pdf

If you look at figure 1.01 Ethnicity proportions throughout the CJS, 2014 you'll see that in the UK black people also commit a lot more crimes than white people. But they make up much more of the prison population than the number of arrests and the like.

Figure 3.01 shows that they're 50% more likely to be victims of crime too.

Poverty rates among ethnic groups in Great Britain

Black Africans have a 45% poverty rate compared to 30% for black Caribbeans and 20% for white people. So, poverty is higher, crime is higher.

Figure 4.02 shows population distribution and black people are far more likely to live in London. Nearly 60% of black people live in London. Nearly 80% of stop and searches on blacks are in London. 60% of these stop and searches are to do with drugs.

Figure 4.09 shows that black's highest crime is robbery, an economic crime along with drug dealing. Fraud is second, drugs are third. This is where a lot of people in poverty commit crimes, crime in order to enrich themselves.

The more you dig, the more you find out it's not just about someone being black for the reason why they commit crimes.

But you don't want to dig.

The countries with the most crime in the world, don't have large black populations. Like Honduras.

ok -- blacks do commit more crime per capita
poverty has something to do with it....but lot's of whites are poor that don't commit crime
my father lived during the DEPRESSION, and didn't commit crime
it's poverty + the culture
the poverty is a product of the culture + history

 

[miketx]

Who's better at slaughtering each other in large numbers, whites or blacks?

blacks murder at a much, much higher rate than whites--well over 4 times the rate
the Hutus slaughtered more in a much smaller amount of time than the Holocaust in WW2....more of the Hutu population participated in the direct killings per capita

So you're cherry picking again?

There have been times when whites have also committed mass slaughter in a small space of time.

These 15 Horrifying Massacres From Human History Will Destroy Your Faith In Mankind

The massacre in Rwanda was brutal, but no more brutal than other brutal massacres.

Your argument is as weak as hot water posing as tea. You're pulling facts out of your ass and then trying to show that this one fact represents the whole of a continent while ignoring other facts from other places.

This isn't debate.

in the US, right now--blacks commit murder at a much higher rate--are you afraid of the truth?? over FOUR times the rate of whites
cherry picking?? hahahhahahahahhaah
obviously the whites are more intelligent and are ''better'' at slaughtering--but that doesn't mean they are more violent, etc
the blacks are still using medieval weapons to slaughter, as they did in Rwanda

as a group, per capita, the blacks murder more.....

According to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, in the year 2008 black youths, who make up 16% of the youth population, accounted for 52% of juvenile violent crime arrests, including 58.5% of youth arrests for homicide and 67% for robbery. Black youths were overrepresented in all offense categories except DUI, liquor laws and drunkenness

look at these numbers!!!!!! OMG
Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

Yes, they do. Am I afraid of the truth? No. I'm afraid of people making arguments by using cherry picked facts out of context.

You say "cherry picking?? hahahahahahahahahaah" and yet, you didn't bring this fact up.

Now, why do black people commit more crimes, and more murders in the US? Is it because they're black? Or is it because of the history of the US black people have been sent to the bottom of the pile and left to rot by society?

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/480250/bulletin.pdf

If you look at figure 1.01 Ethnicity proportions throughout the CJS, 2014 you'll see that in the UK black people also commit a lot more crimes than white people. But they make up much more of the prison population than the number of arrests and the like.

Figure 3.01 shows that they're 50% more likely to be victims of crime too.

Poverty rates among ethnic groups in Great Britain

Black Africans have a 45% poverty rate compared to 30% for black Caribbeans and 20% for white people. So, poverty is higher, crime is higher.

Figure 4.02 shows population distribution and black people are far more likely to live in London. Nearly 60% of black people live in London. Nearly 80% of stop and searches on blacks are in London. 60% of these stop and searches are to do with drugs.

Figure 4.09 shows that black's highest crime is robbery, an economic crime along with drug dealing. Fraud is second, drugs are third. This is where a lot of people in poverty commit crimes, crime in order to enrich themselves.

The more you dig, the more you find out it's not just about someone being black for the reason why they commit crimes.

But you don't want to dig.

The countries with the most crime in the world, don't have large black populations. Like Honduras.

ok -- blacks do commit more crime per capita
poverty has something to do with it....but lot's of whites are poor that don't commit crime
my father lived during the DEPRESSION, and didn't commit crime
it's poverty + the culture
the poverty is a product of the culture + history

Many blacks are taught from a young age to disrespect authority and I've even heard parents complaining when their kid was caught stealing saying he had a right to take the stuff he stole. It'll be a long time before this shit stops if it ever does. And democrats want to keep them right where they are and lie to them every 4 years.

 

[harmonica]

blacks murder at a much, much higher rate than whites--well over 4 times the rate
the Hutus slaughtered more in a much smaller amount of time than the Holocaust in WW2....more of the Hutu population participated in the direct killings per capita

So you're cherry picking again?

There have been times when whites have also committed mass slaughter in a small space of time.

These 15 Horrifying Massacres From Human History Will Destroy Your Faith In Mankind

The massacre in Rwanda was brutal, but no more brutal than other brutal massacres.

Your argument is as weak as hot water posing as tea. You're pulling facts out of your ass and then trying to show that this one fact represents the whole of a continent while ignoring other facts from other places.

This isn't debate.

in the US, right now--blacks commit murder at a much higher rate--are you afraid of the truth?? over FOUR times the rate of whites
cherry picking?? hahahhahahahahhaah
obviously the whites are more intelligent and are ''better'' at slaughtering--but that doesn't mean they are more violent, etc
the blacks are still using medieval weapons to slaughter, as they did in Rwanda

as a group, per capita, the blacks murder more.....

According to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, in the year 2008 black youths, who make up 16% of the youth population, accounted for 52% of juvenile violent crime arrests, including 58.5% of youth arrests for homicide and 67% for robbery. Black youths were overrepresented in all offense categories except DUI, liquor laws and drunkenness

look at these numbers!!!!!! OMG
Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

Yes, they do. Am I afraid of the truth? No. I'm afraid of people making arguments by using cherry picked facts out of context.

You say "cherry picking?? hahahahahahahahahaah" and yet, you didn't bring this fact up.

Now, why do black people commit more crimes, and more murders in the US? Is it because they're black? Or is it because of the history of the US black people have been sent to the bottom of the pile and left to rot by society?

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/480250/bulletin.pdf

If you look at figure 1.01 Ethnicity proportions throughout the CJS, 2014 you'll see that in the UK black people also commit a lot more crimes than white people. But they make up much more of the prison population than the number of arrests and the like.

Figure 3.01 shows that they're 50% more likely to be victims of crime too.

Poverty rates among ethnic groups in Great Britain

Black Africans have a 45% poverty rate compared to 30% for black Caribbeans and 20% for white people. So, poverty is higher, crime is higher.

Figure 4.02 shows population distribution and black people are far more likely to live in London. Nearly 60% of black people live in London. Nearly 80% of stop and searches on blacks are in London. 60% of these stop and searches are to do with drugs.

Figure 4.09 shows that black's highest crime is robbery, an economic crime along with drug dealing. Fraud is second, drugs are third. This is where a lot of people in poverty commit crimes, crime in order to enrich themselves.

The more you dig, the more you find out it's not just about someone being black for the reason why they commit crimes.

But you don't want to dig.

The countries with the most crime in the world, don't have large black populations. Like Honduras.

ok -- blacks do commit more crime per capita
poverty has something to do with it....but lot's of whites are poor that don't commit crime
my father lived during the DEPRESSION, and didn't commit crime
it's poverty + the culture
the poverty is a product of the culture + history

Many blacks are taught from a young age to disrespect authority and I've even heard parents complaining when their kid was caught stealing saying he had a right to take the stuff he stole. It'll be a long time before this shit stops if it ever does. And democrats want to keep them right where they are and lie to them every 4 years.

if anyone has seen the BLM video I've posted, the black kindergarten teacher not only says ''we need to start killing people'', she also yells:

Among the more than four minute racial tirade, she shouts: 'Teach your kids to throw that f***ing cop car in the garbage'.

Seattle teacher's profane speech calls for murder | Daily Mail Online

and then they taught that little black girl crying over Kieth Scott that's it's ok to be a criminal-------with a GUN------to RESIST arrest !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

they teach her the POLICE are bad--the criminal is good

 

[TheParser]

I hope that I am on topic when I point to one area in which European/American influence has been problematic in Africa.

This morning, I read an article that said: "In Zambia -- as across much of Africa -- people are getting fatter."

1. 15.3% of African women are obese, up from 11.4% a decade earlier.
2. 5.6% of African men are obese, up from 2.5%.

(In the United States. about 36% of each gender is obese.)

Why?

One answer: Western-style fast food.

"Diabetes, barely heard of here not long ago, now affects 4.1% of Zambians."

One local nutritionist says, "People need to go back to their roots. They need to know that whatever we're growing in our country is actually quite healthy."

Source: "For Africans, prosperity is inviting obesity" by Ann M. Simmons in the Los Angeles Times, December 21, 2017.




P.S. I read in another source that many Africans have traditionally never suffered from certain cancers, for the traditional African diet has included a lot of fiber.

 

[August West]

As whities came to Africa they mad it prosperous. As they were kicked out Africa is on the best way to its routs and traditions:

In the Stone Age

They made it prosperous for themselves, not the people who were actually doing the work.

 

[harmonica]

As whities came to Africa they mad it prosperous. As they were kicked out Africa is on the best way to its routs and traditions:

In the Stone Age

They made it prosperous for themselves, not the people who were actually doing the work.

agree--but a lot of Africa would still be in the ''stone age'' if not for whites
some of them didn't even have a written history/written language/etc

 

[frigidweirdo]

Who's better at slaughtering each other in large numbers, whites or blacks?

blacks murder at a much, much higher rate than whites--well over 4 times the rate
the Hutus slaughtered more in a much smaller amount of time than the Holocaust in WW2....more of the Hutu population participated in the direct killings per capita

So you're cherry picking again?

There have been times when whites have also committed mass slaughter in a small space of time.

These 15 Horrifying Massacres From Human History Will Destroy Your Faith In Mankind

The massacre in Rwanda was brutal, but no more brutal than other brutal massacres.

Your argument is as weak as hot water posing as tea. You're pulling facts out of your ass and then trying to show that this one fact represents the whole of a continent while ignoring other facts from other places.

This isn't debate.

Expanded Homicide Data Table 6

Wow, you've post a link that I'm not going to look at because you've not posted anything else.

??

Try words.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Who's better at slaughtering each other in large numbers, whites or blacks?

blacks murder at a much, much higher rate than whites--well over 4 times the rate
the Hutus slaughtered more in a much smaller amount of time than the Holocaust in WW2....more of the Hutu population participated in the direct killings per capita

So you're cherry picking again?

There have been times when whites have also committed mass slaughter in a small space of time.

These 15 Horrifying Massacres From Human History Will Destroy Your Faith In Mankind

The massacre in Rwanda was brutal, but no more brutal than other brutal massacres.

Your argument is as weak as hot water posing as tea. You're pulling facts out of your ass and then trying to show that this one fact represents the whole of a continent while ignoring other facts from other places.

This isn't debate.

in the US, right now--blacks commit murder at a much higher rate--are you afraid of the truth?? over FOUR times the rate of whites
cherry picking?? hahahhahahahahhaah
obviously the whites are more intelligent and are ''better'' at slaughtering--but that doesn't mean they are more violent, etc
the blacks are still using medieval weapons to slaughter, as they did in Rwanda

as a group, per capita, the blacks murder more.....

According to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, in the year 2008 black youths, who make up 16% of the youth population, accounted for 52% of juvenile violent crime arrests, including 58.5% of youth arrests for homicide and 67% for robbery. Black youths were overrepresented in all offense categories except DUI, liquor laws and drunkenness

look at these numbers!!!!!! OMG
Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

Yes, they do. Am I afraid of the truth? No. I'm afraid of people making arguments by using cherry picked facts out of context.

You say "cherry picking?? hahahahahahahahahaah" and yet, you didn't bring this fact up.

Now, why do black people commit more crimes, and more murders in the US? Is it because they're black? Or is it because of the history of the US black people have been sent to the bottom of the pile and left to rot by society?

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/480250/bulletin.pdf

If you look at figure 1.01 Ethnicity proportions throughout the CJS, 2014 you'll see that in the UK black people also commit a lot more crimes than white people. But they make up much more of the prison population than the number of arrests and the like.

Figure 3.01 shows that they're 50% more likely to be victims of crime too.

Poverty rates among ethnic groups in Great Britain

Black Africans have a 45% poverty rate compared to 30% for black Caribbeans and 20% for white people. So, poverty is higher, crime is higher.

Figure 4.02 shows population distribution and black people are far more likely to live in London. Nearly 60% of black people live in London. Nearly 80% of stop and searches on blacks are in London. 60% of these stop and searches are to do with drugs.

Figure 4.09 shows that black's highest crime is robbery, an economic crime along with drug dealing. Fraud is second, drugs are third. This is where a lot of people in poverty commit crimes, crime in order to enrich themselves.

The more you dig, the more you find out it's not just about someone being black for the reason why they commit crimes.

But you don't want to dig.

The countries with the most crime in the world, don't have large black populations. Like Honduras.

ok -- blacks do commit more crime per capita
poverty has something to do with it....but lot's of whites are poor that don't commit crime
my father lived during the DEPRESSION, and didn't commit crime
it's poverty + the culture
the poverty is a product of the culture + history

Blacks in certain countries do.

A lot of whites in poverty don't commit crimes, and a lot of blacks in poverty don't commit crimes. Cherry picking doesn't make things real.

Is it the culture? What do you mean by "culture" here?

You say it's "a product of the culture", well, potentially. The culture here is that black people went through slavery, segregation and discrimination on a large scale. This clearly has something to do with it.

Potentially there's something in the make up of the people too. Africa is a harsh place and to survive, which is what Africans have been doing for a long time, you need to be tough. China had an abundance of food, they didn't need to be tough. Europeans had more food. The animals in Africa are tougher, the people are tougher, it's a part of the mentality.

There is also a sense of entitlement. I don't know where this came from, but it does exist. Then again it also exists within other communities. African politics is corrupt, different tribes get in power and then hand out the benefits and mess over the other tribes. But that sounds just like US politics too, only without the tribes.