Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sure you do. The correlation between temperature and CO2 is broken. Cross plotting it proves it.
What evidence is that
You might care s0n but few others do.
Most people...by far btw...don't tend to the hysterical. Have real things to worry about.
Show us some evidence the public cares about extinction.
Links please....
Drrrrrrr
I don't give a rat's ass whether or not something is a cross plot and your new claim here that it is necessary is just absolute IDIOCY. You've never mentioned a crossplot before today. If its crucial, what the fuck have you been relying on all this time?Again... that's not a cross plot. I get that you are afraid of cross plotting atmospheric CO2 versus temperature. And you should be too.
Don't be afraid of cross plots.I don't give a rat's ass whether or not something is a cross plot and your new claim here that it is necessary is just absolute IDIOCY. You've never mentioned a crossplot before today. If its crucial, what the fuck have you been relying on all this time?
And, despite saying that it's the best possible evidence for your claim, you have yet to present one. WHERE is the crossplot of CO2 vs temperature upon which you've put all your hopes and dreams?
No tell usRead my thread. Look at all the graphs I posted after it.
No tell us
Fuck you, you ignorant asshole.Don't be afraid of cross plots.
I don't deny the existence of the GHG effect. I deny their ridiculous modeling which multiplies the GHG effect by 3 times.Only a moron or a polluter would deny the existence of the greenhouse effect. Which CO2 causes. Though CO2 isn't the cause, you probably heard of children dying in cars parked out in the sun. It is the same principle.
Check it out. This dumbass doesn't understand that CO2 has a logarithmic effect. He's claiming that since the effect isn't linear, it isn't real, even though nobody has ever said it was linear.Don't be afraid of cross plots.
Empirical climate data shouldn't make you this angry. The origin of the data is Antarctic ice cores but you get the same result with any dataset which compares pre to post industrial revolution time periods.Fuck you, you ignorant asshole.
1) What is the origin of this plot?
2) What time frames are included in Pre and Post Industrial Revolution?
3) What could have caused a correlation of 0.9856, based on the laws of physics and chemistry, to break?
Check it out. This dumbass doesn't understand that CO2 has a logarithmic effect. He's claiming that since the effect isn't linear, it isn't real, even though nobody has ever said it was linear.
That is, because he's a moron, he thinks everyone else is wrong.
No, it's on the logarithmic line for the current concentration.Increased CO2 hasn't caused shit. The present temperature is still on it's pre-industrial trend line.
I didn’tTell you? I just called you an idiot. Did you hear me?
My questions concerned your beloved crossplot as you well knew. I suspect there is a reason you don't want to tell us.Empirical climate data shouldn't make you this angry. The origin of the data is Antarctic ice cores but you get the same result with any dataset which compares pre to post industrial revolution time periods.
There is also his belief that making this sort of plot is the standard (the only?) method by which scientists/statisticians calculate correlation.Increased CO2 hasn't caused shit. The present temperature is still on it's pre-industrial trend line. I'm proving to you that there is no correlation for temperature following CO2. Feel free to show a cross plot of CO2 versus temperature that you believe agrees with you.
View attachment 780917
Increased CO2 hasn't caused shit. The present temperature is still on it's pre-industrial trend line. I'm proving to you that there is no correlation for temperature following CO2. Feel free to show a cross plot of CO2 versus temperature that you believe agrees with you.
View attachment 780917
Cross plots don’t lie. Maybe you should make a post Industrial Revolution cross plot of CO2 versus temperature to discover your error.No, it's on the logarithmic line for the current concentration.
Let's start simple. Did you do a logarithmic fit?
Let's start simpler. Do you know what a logarithm is?
Oh, your graph is nonsense. Why did it only use 3 points, for example? Since far more points are available, your graph looks to be deliberately deceptive. Honest brokers don't leave out inconvenient data , and you did.
I get that you are upset. I have rocked your world.Read this and learn something.
Linear Global Temperature Correlation to Carbon Dioxide Level, Sea Level, and Innovative Solutions to a Projected 6°C Warming by 2100
Discover the truth about climate change projections and the causative factors behind global warming. Explore evidence-based analysis, temperature correlations, and future trends. Stay informed on policy recommendations for climate remediation.www.scirp.org
