Yes, Russia Likely Did Swing Votes For Donald Trump

The OP also likely makes Trump an "illegitimate" president. This is even worse than the George W. Bush debacle of 2000. At least Bush didn't have help from a hostile foreign power - just Jeb Bush, Katherine Harris, and the U.S. Supreme Court.

This is what happens when you grow up getting "participation" trophies.
 
Thanks!



Here's one.



View attachment 178942




So. Really? Does anyone really believe that reading that swayed votes?
the ones released before election favored trump and 2 others running over hillary ,,,,,after election they just posted whatever they thought would bring discord to America

So, the evidence shows that the Russians didn't like Hillary because of whatever, but you can't point to anyone who changed their minds because of the Russians. You should just be honest and admit that the Corporate Whore was a flawed candidate in 2008 and was no better in 2016. You supported the ONLY person in North America who couldn't beat Trump.
yes her campaign was flawed trump won and we're paying for it

You may be paying for it...I'm doing quite well.
I did well under GWB and Trump so far BUT the world laughs at us ,,,,I will vote Republican when hell freezes over

I am glad...if you start voting Republican, I'll know they've gone wrong.
 
Too bad those Russians didn't pay for large disorderly groups of manic paid protestors that blocked senior citizens cars in Arizona and placed freaky disorderly stunt people inside Trump rallies all over the country like SOROS did. I guess they are just broke Russian losers because I doubt those who even saw any Facebook postings are few and far between. It is known that one gets inundated by the sheer volume of messages on Facebook and social media and a smart person just keeps on going. Soros is hated in many countries by the way and he was a big funder of the Democrat campaign.


LewRockwell.com ANTI-STATEANTI-WARPRO-MARKET
It Looks Like George Soros is Funding the Trump Protests Just Like He Funded the Ferguson Riots

By Daisy Luther

November 11, 2016

Paid instigators are making an already bad situation much much worse.

As riots and protests rage through the streets of America, the question has to be asked:

Does someone behind the scenes want to see civil war in the United States?

The answer is almost certainly yes.

And it isn’t likely to settle down anytime in the next few days. (If you aren’t prepped for this, go here to learn how to stay safe.)

Just a little background: this has been going on since the midst of the campaign when actors were hired on Craigslist and trained to disrupt rallies.

For example, one Craigslist ad was answered by Paul Horner, who admitted he was paid $3,500 to cause a scene at a Trump event in Fountain Hills, Arizona.

“As for who these people were affiliated with that interviewed me, my guess would be Hillary Clinton’s campaign,” Horner said. “The actual check I received after I was done with the job was from a group called ‘Women Are The Future’. After I was hired, they told me if anyone asked any questions about who I was with or communicated with me in any way, I should start talking about how great Bernie Sanders is.” Horner continued, “It was mostly women in their 60’s at the interview that I went to…” (source)
 
So, you got an examples of the brilliant postings that these trolls did that swayed the election?
google them ,,,there are 1000's all targeted against hillary do your own work



I've seen none that are attributed to the Russian trolls.


I don't think they have released them.
Postings correll
These are the Facebook posts Russia used to undermine Hillary Clinton’s campaign
Russian Facebook and Twitter accounts masqueraded as pro-Trump Americans when they took aim at Clinton.
CASEY MICHELOCT 6, 2017, 8:01 AM
AN ANTI-CLINTON BIAS COURSED THROUGH FACEBOOK PAGES SECRETLY RUN BY RUSSIAN ACTORS (CREDIT: AP/ANDREW HARNIK)
earlier this week by analyzing Russia’s creation of hundreds of fake Facebook accounts, pumped via ads and promotion into Americans’ feeds.

For part 1 of this series, click here.

We’ve also learned that certain pages called for followers to vote for Jill Steinand Bernie Sanders, as opposed to Clinton — although those posts, especially as pertaining to Sanders, haven’t yet been revealed publicly.


Both the “Secured Borders” and “Beyond Patriotic” pages revealed by the Daily Beast were steeped in anti-Clinton rhetoric, with the latter organizing on-the-ground rallies that featured Americans chanting to “lock her up!” In one example from “Secured Borders,” the authors — referring to Clinton as “Killary” — piggy-backed on the outrage over Clinton’s comments that certain Trump supporters are “deplorables.” As the post wrote, “If Killary thinks that being American, loving your country and be concerned about ours and our children’s future is deplorable, then hell yeah count me in in that basket! [sic]”


Anti-Clinton rhetoric shone through on the “Heart of Texas” page, a Russian account that advocated for Texas secession. When the page, which was the most popular Texas secession account on Facebook, wasn’t pushing to break Texas off from the rest of the U.S., it was railing against Clinton’s campaign, policies, and personality.

One post described Clinton as “pure evil,” while another shared an obviously photoshopped picture of her shaking hands with Osama bin Laden. Another post exclaimed “Hillary for prison!”, saying that Clinton “committed so many crimes that lifelong prison sentence is the least of what she deserves [sic].” All but one of these posts were published in the run-up to the election.



Thanks!



Here's one.



View attachment 178942




So. Really? Does anyone really believe that reading that swayed votes?
the ones released before election favored trump and 2 others running over hillary ,,,,,after election they just posted whatever they thought would bring discord to America


I asked a question. Do you believe that argument is so compelling that it swayed voters?
 
the ones released before election favored trump and 2 others running over hillary ,,,,,after election they just posted whatever they thought would bring discord to America

So, the evidence shows that the Russians didn't like Hillary because of whatever, but you can't point to anyone who changed their minds because of the Russians. You should just be honest and admit that the Corporate Whore was a flawed candidate in 2008 and was no better in 2016. You supported the ONLY person in North America who couldn't beat Trump.
yes her campaign was flawed trump won and we're paying for it

You may be paying for it...I'm doing quite well.
I did well under GWB and Trump so far BUT the world laughs at us ,,,,I will vote Republican when hell freezes over

I am glad...if you start voting Republican, I'll know they've gone wrong.
I was one of you up until my last republican vote for gwb in 2000 It still sickens me ,my GWB vote BUT this pos trump makes GWB look like FDR
 
google them ,,,there are 1000's all targeted against hillary do your own work



I've seen none that are attributed to the Russian trolls.


I don't think they have released them.
Postings correll
These are the Facebook posts Russia used to undermine Hillary Clinton’s campaign
Russian Facebook and Twitter accounts masqueraded as pro-Trump Americans when they took aim at Clinton.
CASEY MICHELOCT 6, 2017, 8:01 AM
AN ANTI-CLINTON BIAS COURSED THROUGH FACEBOOK PAGES SECRETLY RUN BY RUSSIAN ACTORS (CREDIT: AP/ANDREW HARNIK)
earlier this week by analyzing Russia’s creation of hundreds of fake Facebook accounts, pumped via ads and promotion into Americans’ feeds.

For part 1 of this series, click here.

We’ve also learned that certain pages called for followers to vote for Jill Steinand Bernie Sanders, as opposed to Clinton — although those posts, especially as pertaining to Sanders, haven’t yet been revealed publicly.


Both the “Secured Borders” and “Beyond Patriotic” pages revealed by the Daily Beast were steeped in anti-Clinton rhetoric, with the latter organizing on-the-ground rallies that featured Americans chanting to “lock her up!” In one example from “Secured Borders,” the authors — referring to Clinton as “Killary” — piggy-backed on the outrage over Clinton’s comments that certain Trump supporters are “deplorables.” As the post wrote, “If Killary thinks that being American, loving your country and be concerned about ours and our children’s future is deplorable, then hell yeah count me in in that basket! [sic]”


Anti-Clinton rhetoric shone through on the “Heart of Texas” page, a Russian account that advocated for Texas secession. When the page, which was the most popular Texas secession account on Facebook, wasn’t pushing to break Texas off from the rest of the U.S., it was railing against Clinton’s campaign, policies, and personality.

One post described Clinton as “pure evil,” while another shared an obviously photoshopped picture of her shaking hands with Osama bin Laden. Another post exclaimed “Hillary for prison!”, saying that Clinton “committed so many crimes that lifelong prison sentence is the least of what she deserves [sic].” All but one of these posts were published in the run-up to the election.



Thanks!



Here's one.



View attachment 178942




So. Really? Does anyone really believe that reading that swayed votes?
the ones released before election favored trump and 2 others running over hillary ,,,,,after election they just posted whatever they thought would bring discord to America


I asked a question. Do you believe that argument is so compelling that it swayed voters?
I do believe it swayed votes Enough to win in the states she lost ,,I don't know How did you let this moron win ?
 
I've seen none that are attributed to the Russian trolls.


I don't think they have released them.
Postings correll
These are the Facebook posts Russia used to undermine Hillary Clinton’s campaign
Russian Facebook and Twitter accounts masqueraded as pro-Trump Americans when they took aim at Clinton.
CASEY MICHELOCT 6, 2017, 8:01 AM
AN ANTI-CLINTON BIAS COURSED THROUGH FACEBOOK PAGES SECRETLY RUN BY RUSSIAN ACTORS (CREDIT: AP/ANDREW HARNIK)
earlier this week by analyzing Russia’s creation of hundreds of fake Facebook accounts, pumped via ads and promotion into Americans’ feeds.

For part 1 of this series, click here.

We’ve also learned that certain pages called for followers to vote for Jill Steinand Bernie Sanders, as opposed to Clinton — although those posts, especially as pertaining to Sanders, haven’t yet been revealed publicly.


Both the “Secured Borders” and “Beyond Patriotic” pages revealed by the Daily Beast were steeped in anti-Clinton rhetoric, with the latter organizing on-the-ground rallies that featured Americans chanting to “lock her up!” In one example from “Secured Borders,” the authors — referring to Clinton as “Killary” — piggy-backed on the outrage over Clinton’s comments that certain Trump supporters are “deplorables.” As the post wrote, “If Killary thinks that being American, loving your country and be concerned about ours and our children’s future is deplorable, then hell yeah count me in in that basket! [sic]”


Anti-Clinton rhetoric shone through on the “Heart of Texas” page, a Russian account that advocated for Texas secession. When the page, which was the most popular Texas secession account on Facebook, wasn’t pushing to break Texas off from the rest of the U.S., it was railing against Clinton’s campaign, policies, and personality.

One post described Clinton as “pure evil,” while another shared an obviously photoshopped picture of her shaking hands with Osama bin Laden. Another post exclaimed “Hillary for prison!”, saying that Clinton “committed so many crimes that lifelong prison sentence is the least of what she deserves [sic].” All but one of these posts were published in the run-up to the election.



Thanks!



Here's one.



View attachment 178942




So. Really? Does anyone really believe that reading that swayed votes?
the ones released before election favored trump and 2 others running over hillary ,,,,,after election they just posted whatever they thought would bring discord to America


I asked a question. Do you believe that argument is so compelling that it swayed voters?
I do believe it swayed votes Enough to win in the states she lost ,,I don't know How did you let this moron win ?



It is hard for me to credit that you truly believe that THIS,

upload_2018-2-25_15-13-47-png.178942




determined the Presidential election.



This site, for one example was full of Trump supporters, making far better arguments for him that anything that any Russian could have come up with.



WHy not give the credit to the election to the Trump supporters on this site?
 
So, the evidence shows that the Russians didn't like Hillary because of whatever, but you can't point to anyone who changed their minds because of the Russians. You should just be honest and admit that the Corporate Whore was a flawed candidate in 2008 and was no better in 2016. You supported the ONLY person in North America who couldn't beat Trump.
yes her campaign was flawed trump won and we're paying for it

You may be paying for it...I'm doing quite well.
I did well under GWB and Trump so far BUT the world laughs at us ,,,,I will vote Republican when hell freezes over

I am glad...if you start voting Republican, I'll know they've gone wrong.
I was one of you up until my last republican vote for gwb in 2000 It still sickens me ,my GWB vote BUT this pos trump makes GWB look like FDR

eddie, I really have to admire your consistancy, but I believe that if I find that you and I are voting alike, I must pulling the wrong lever.
 
5a909a0c2000008806eafd48.jpeg


And he didn’t keep talking about the WikiLeaks emails stolen by Russia because he thought voters didn’t care.


WASHINGTON ― As John Bentley waited in line to see President Barack Obama campaign for Hillary Clinton just days before the 2016 election, he worried that he’d been unable to persuade his son to cast a ballot for Clinton, too.

The 24-year-old believed Clinton was untrustworthy, with new emails released by WikiLeaks providing fresh proof on a daily basis.

“Can you believe it?” wondered Bentley, a 70-year-old African-American man and a lifelong Democrat.

Fifteen months later, special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation has found that the skepticism that afflicted people like Bentley’s son was no fluke. It was the result of deliberate efforts by the Russian government to hurt Clinton and help Donald Trump win the presidency ― efforts that included the targeting of young African-Americans like Bentley’s son.

“Defendants and their co-conspirators began to encourage U.S. minority groups not to vote in the 2016 U.S. presidential election or to vote for a third-party U.S. presidential candidate,” according to a Feb. 16 grand jury indictment obtained by Mueller.

In fact, the day before Obama visited Jacksonville, Florida, to support Clinton, Russians purchased an ad for the Instagram account of a fake group called Blacktivist. It urged African-Americans to vote for a third-party candidate. “Choose peace and vote for Jill Stein. Trust me, it’s not a wasted vote,” the ad read, according to Mueller’s indictment.

It is impossible to know precisely how many voters nationally stayed home or voted for a third-party candidate because of the Russians’ social media campaign. Nevertheless, the details from the indictment raise new questions about the legitimacy of Trump’s victory.

While Trump maintains there is no proof that the Russian assistance affected the election, the contours of that final month of campaigning and the closeness of the tally suggest that the opposite is true: that it is highly unlikely the Russian efforts did not affect the outcome.

“There’s no question that it mattered,” said Democratic pollster Mark Mellman. “There’s no question that they thought it mattered. There’s no question that the Hillary Clinton folks thought it mattered.”

Over the entire final month of the race, Trump essentially centered his campaign on talking about the emails stolen by Russian intelligence and then released through its allied group WikiLeaks. The messages, which were sent to and from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, cast Clinton in a bad light. “We love WikiLeaks!” Trump would tell his rally crowds and live TV audiences, urging them to go to the website and read the emails for themselves. “Boy, do we love WikiLeaks.”

Democrats and even some Republican consultants said the Trump campaign would not have based its closing strategy on that theme if it were not working.

More: Yes, Russia Likely Did Swing Votes For Donald Trump

There is no doubt that Russia swung votes for Trump. There is no doubt that Trump knew that in real time. I didn't really need this article to tell me what I've known all along. It was obvious. The OP also likely makes Trump an "illegitimate" president. This is even worse than the George W. Bush debacle of 2000. At least Bush didn't have help from a hostile foreign power - just Jeb Bush, Katherine Harris, and the U.S. Supreme Court.
Every day you get on here and tell everyone how dumb trump is and what a buffoon he is; and now you're saying he's so smart he controlled an entire election. Hilarious
 

Forum List

Back
Top