usmbguest5318
Gold Member
Sheesh, you obviously suck as a lawyer but you'd make a great Lewinsky.
mmm. maybe not for Republicans though.
S.T. F. U.
Nope, now it's more fun
Well more power to you, I do wonder why you need to go out of your way to convince others you are several bricks shy of a load.
.. if I was brought up to be a sniveling, emotional basket case, I'd probably feel the same...
I won't comment on how you were brought up, that is a topic which is and ought to be against the rules of this site.
It is sufficient to point out you aren't very bright, that is if your posts are a measure of your intelligence. Your efforts to be humorous fall flat.
Are you really naive enough to think that the houses of Congress being comprised as it is of so many attorneys cannot make the case that the behavior our current president has exhibited constitutes a high crime or misdemeanor? If they so determine to do, there is likely no person or entity that can reverse their decision. (Such a thing has never been tested, but then much about what Trump's thoughts, said and done has never happened before, for good reason.)I have for months now thought Congress should remove Trump from office on general principle alone. After all, it's not as though his successor won't be a Republican.bye-bye Mr Pres.
I didn't know "general principal" was a matter of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Yes, that's what America really needs, liberal thought, speech and in my opinion gestapo..
Please excuse Lumpy, he meant America needs liberal thought, speech and gazpacho.
I agree with what he stated, notwithstanding his spelling error; breaking good bread and eating healthy will benefit Trump supporters, if and only if they will listen to liberal ideas and liberal speeches on serious issues.
Not listening and simply reading tweets is harmful to every living thing!
breaking good bread and eating healthy will benefit Trump supporters, if and only if they will listen to liberal ideas and liberal speeches on serious issues.
Truly, for me it's not about liberal or illiberal, conservative or not conservative, ideas. It's simply a matter of sage, lawful and ethical comportment and expression. I don't have to agree with anyone's policy ideas for there are strong arguments for and against specific ideas and policies on both sides of a most matters. That isn't and has nothing to do with the nature of my disapprobation for Trump and Trumpkins. The problem I have pertains to their procrustean formulation that agitates for conclusions and preferences that defy even the most marginal animation of cognitive perspicacity. I find that simply unacceptable wherever and in whomever it be manifest because that is the behavior of rocks and creatures of only instinct. It is subhuman.