WTF??!! WMD's after all!!!!

We know Iraq had chemical weapons all along because we sold them to them.



That may be but the punchline for the past 9 or 10 years is that there were no WMD's. Go out and ask 100 people today and 95% of them will say no WMD's.

This isnt a thread about whether we should have went or not.........its about how crooked our government is. No wonder Obama lies every day.......he got it from Bush!!!:2up:

We're getting hosed s0ns!!! They want all this partisan bickering going on while they amass more and more government power!!:eusa_dance:
 
We know Iraq had chemical weapons all along because we sold them to them.



That may be but the punchline for the past 9 or 10 years is that there were no WMD's. Go out and ask 100 people today and 95% of them will say no WMD's.

This isnt a thread about whether we should have went or not.........its about how crooked our government is. No wonder Obama lies every day.......he got it from Bush!!!:2up:

We're getting hosed s0ns!!! They want all this partisan bickering going on while they amass more and more government power!!:eusa_dance:


Depends on how WMD is being defined. Right now, it applies to any explosive no matter how trivial. If wea pplied current definitions of WMD abroad, eevryone would have them if they have so much as a grenade.

At the time, Iraq possibly having WMD was more in the sense they might have a nuclear or biological program. And it's not like a holy thing either as the US has one of the biggest WMD programs around.
 
Nobody went to war over inert chemical weapons, the cutting edge technology of 1914.

They went to war because Bush implied that Saddam had nukes he was willing to hand over to Bin Laden.



LOL......of course, the superhero of the matrix bubble dwellers jumps in and brings the sheeple zombie viewpoint.

Holy fuck s0n......how do you navigate the real world being so fucking naïve??:coffee::up::up:
 
Sorry, but Gomer Bush and his henchmen/woman claimed there was an ACTIVE chemical and nuclear weapons program not a bunch of crap leftover from the 1980s. This stuff wasn`t a threat to the U.S.
 
Sorry, but Gomer Bush and his henchmen/woman claimed there was an ACTIVE chemical and nuclear weapons program not a bunch of crap leftover from the 1980s. This stuff wasn`t a threat to the U.S.



Oh Gawd!!!


Of course the PC zombie matrix dwellers miss the point as per usual!! No wonder why our society is devolving into a shithole.:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::up:
 
Bush had his WMD. Obabble has his "ISIS is not islamic"...along with host of other "realities"...like the unprecedented coalition. If you don't know when you are being bullshitted you are doomed. The presence of bullshit does not necessarily mean bad decisions are about to be made. It just attempts to make you feel better about the decisions being made. You have to sort thru the bs...no matter what the situation.
 
Well Saddam didn't kill all those Kurds with his good looks.

I never thought he had nuclear weapons but I knew he had chemical because he used them on the Kurds.

He also ingnored the UN after his Kuwait debacle.

I didn't agree with invading Iraq but I could understand it. WMD's aren't anything to take lightly especially when in the hands of a psycho like Saddam and his minions.
 
We know Iraq had chemical weapons all along because we sold them to them.
So Bush didn't lie.

End of story.

Uh, no, he did.

He did not say, "Saddam has some old Chemical weapons that have gone largely inert because of age and chemical degradation, and he lacks the missiles or artillery pieces to delivery them."

He talked about mushroom clouds and threats to american cities, which there clearly wasn't.
 

Forum List

Back
Top