Wisconsin Supreme Court Election

vote tampering is not exactly "voter fraud" you ignorant lout. This is why i stated that i was wrong to state that the jokers nickolaus was involved in were guilty of "voter fraud".

Had benny actually done his homework, he would have known that
in 2001, nickolaus was granted immunity to testify about her role as a computer analyst for the assembly republican caucus, then under investigation - along with the senate republican caucus and the democratic caucuses for both houses - for using state resources to secretly run campaigns.

nickolaus, who worked for seven years as a data analyst and computer specialist for the assembly republican caucus, headed up an effort to develop a computer program that averaged the performance of republicans in statewide races by ward.
during some of that time, prosser served as assembly speaker, meaning he was essentially her boss.

Prosser, who was speaker of the assembly in 1995 and 1996 and controlled the republican caucus, was not part of the investigation.

Nickolaus resigned from her state job in 2002 shortly before launching her county clerk campaign.


new count gives prosser lead after waukesha county inputting error


you're the computer analyst screwing around with campaign performance records, that's screwing around with the records of how people are perceived to vote, how they respond to polls, projections on voting districts and how they are leaning, etc. That's tampering with voter information, plain and simple.

But now, benny will spin this tidbit until kingdom come, because benny is just too damned willfully ignorant to admit/recognize when he's wrong on a point. Subsequently, benny is too much of a coward to answer a simple quesiton...if the situation were reveresed and kloppenburg won, would benny be so acquiescent?

I expect just more dodging and bs from benny, folks.....

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bk-dqj4fhmm&feature=related]youtube - ‪classic movie line #4‬‏[/ame]



translation: Del doesn't have the brains or the cojones to debate the issue rationally.

she lost. get over it.

when candidates that i vote for lose, that's what i do, you whiny pissant. :lol:
 
Notice how our intellectually coward Windbag STILL won't answer the question! :razz:

Bottom line: Wisconsin LAW gave Kloppenburg the right to pertition for the recount....she got it under the LAW. If there was no money for such, then the State would have long ago removed such a statute and stipulated that a candidate had to fund such themselves....a stupid notion that only a stupid person, such as our Quantum Windbag, would propose.

Neocon toadies like the Windbag will scurry to any corner rather than just answer a simple question honestly.

Are you talking about the question I answered pages ago? Do you see me whining about NY-26?

If you answered the question honestly and straight forward, I must have either missed it, forgotten it, or confused you with another neocon numbskull. I'll check it just to make sure.

And there's no comparison between NY-26 and Wisconsin, you silly Windbag. NY-26 is where the neocon GOP got it's ass handed to them for embracing the teabaggers and Ryan's budget BS. Wisconsin had a politico crony with a dubious past in elections involved AGAIN in questionable actions. Big difference that any rational, intelligent person can see.


Wisconsin law allows her to take it to court too, if she ponies up the cash. Bottom line, the only reason she challenged the vote is she knew she did not have to pay for it.

Bottom line: supposition and conjecture by a Quantum Windbag who doesn't have the cojones to admit that Kloppenburg had more than probable cause and a legal right to take the avenue she did. The results are in, and as she stated, she accepted them. End of story.

I have told you before not to rewrite my posts. Now you can defend your actions to the mods.
 
taichiliberal;3713664[COLOR="Red" said:
Vote tampering is not exactly "voter fraud" you ignorant lout. This is why I stated that I was wrong to state that the jokers Nickolaus was involved in were guilty of "voter fraud".
That would be correct, vote tampering is the act of changing the OFFICIAL numbers of votes in an election, voter fraud is the act of a person voting illegally. Neither of which was an issue in any investigation. You lied... you continue to lie.

Nickolaus was in charge of the computer tally of potential voters for the GOP in a primary/standard election season, you simpleton! If the GOP members were guilty of illegal use of funds during their (secret) campaigns, and Nickolaus was part of screwing with those numbers, then that's tampering with the official numbers of GOP voters. Got that bunky? This is why the cops investigating the GOP officials were looking at Nicolaus as a person of interest, and offered her (or her lawyer requested) immunity from prosecution for her testimony.....and people were convicted.

The only liar here, Benny is YOU. Either that or you're truly stupid and can't comprehend the facts, or your just another willfully ignorant and stubborn neocon flunkie.


This dumbass is what the investigation was about, state workers working on campaigns during state time.

none of which constitute vote tampering. She created programs that analyzed voting patterns, she did not tamper with votes.

Really? Who says so? YOU? "Secret campaign" isn't about paying extra state workers for illegal work on a campaign, and that doesn't require a computer analyst, just an accountant with questionable morals. Campaigns are about voters, potential voters, demographics, etc. You fuck with those numbers in any shape, form or pattern, and you are tampering with voting results, you blithering idiot. See Benny, YOU keep trying to push you're incredibly absurd assumptions/suppostion and conjecture as FACT, while ignoring the actual FACTS of the case at hand...and you look the damned Benny fool doing it every time. But hey, all fucked up neocon zealots take their BS over reality, so I expect nothing less from our Benny boy.



New count gives Prosser lead after Waukesha County inputting error[/COLOR]

It's analyzing it you dumbfuck, not tampering with anything. The investigation had nothing to do with her analyzing public information, it had to do with her working for the GOP caucus on state time. Her work for the caucus did not change (tamper with) one fucking vote, it analyzed voting patterns. Political parties do it all the time, they should, it's information they can use to target their campaign messages into areas where they will have the best effect.

Analyzing a "secret campaign" isn't SOP, my Benny buffoon. It's not SOP for a political party to run a "secret campaign" using state personnel to do God knows what to the data obtained in the field. That COMPROMISES the integrity of the information....conflict of interest, questionable practices, etc. This is why there was an investigation, and indictments and convictions....and why Nickolaus took an immunity from prosecution deal. IF she was just analyzing data and was not aware of the shennanigans, she would have either blown the whistle or just testified as a witness. Bottom line: your fabricated scenario has NOTHING to do with the FACTS, Benny boy, because you sure as hell cannot produce any documents that back up your supposition and conjecture.

I do notice you're completely intellectually dishonest attempt to change the charge from "vote tampering" (an illegal act) to "tampering with voter information", which would be voter fraud if she actually did that since to tamper with voter information you have to change the voters official registration information. Simply analyzing publicly available data isn't tampering with anything you moron.

Folks, look at my responses above. Benny is such a pathetic liar and intellectually dishonest person that he actually believes repeating is erroneous opinions and convoluted logic will make them viable. Only Benny would be stupid enough to try and split a hair and then claim different roots.

But now, Benny will spin this tidbit until kingdom come, because Benny is just too damned willfully ignorant to admit/recognize when he's wrong on a point. Subsequently, Benny is too much of a coward to answer a simple quesiton...if the situation were reversed and Kloppenburg won, would Benny be so acquiescent?

I expect just more dodging and BS from Benny, folks.....
Why would I dodge pointing out how amazingly stupid and dishonest you are? There are a few possibilities here...

And here's where Benny yet again treats his fabrications, supposition and conjecture as viable fact to be built upon. Benny is one delusional little fool. Let's watch him dance.....

1. You're just too damned stupid to know the difference between analyzing data and vote tampering. Benny's opinion that the chronology of the posts does not support.2. You know what it is but refuse to acknowledge the truth because you've painted yourself to far into a corner to get out (you're a liar) Benny's opinion that the chronology of the posts does not support.
3. Both (which you've made clear is the case, you are stupid and a liar) Benny's opinion that the chronology of the posts does not support.

I'll comment on the rest of your drivel when you learn how to use the "quote function". I'm not going to go through my own post to parse out your stupid crap.

An excuse used by intellectually dishonest neocon toadies like Benny, because my technique keeps fresh in the mind of the reader how much of a POS Benny is in a debate.

And once again, when you ADMIT that what you posted in post 607 is a lie, and that all of your protestations since then are lies, I'll answer your question.


Do you want an answer bad enough to be honest?

Now, grow some fucking balls and just admit that what you said in post 607 was a lie. I mean hell, you've unwittingly posted all of the information that proves it was a lie in a rather bizarre attempt to support it, so it shouldn't be difficult to admit it.

Typical ploy of the intellectually dishonest neocon toadie...Benny IGNORES the facts for his own opinion and interpretation of law and history, and then wants people to accept and abide by his version as reality, and will just repeat himself ad nauseum. Pity Benny hasn't realized that nonsense didn't work for Rove in 2008 or in 2010.

As you can see folks, I took Benny to task and proved him to be just a frustrated, dishonest child with delusions of mature intellect. Benny's finished, but like all dishonest neocon toadies, Benny just has to have the last word, as Benny feels repeating a lie will magically make it true. I leave him to it.
The only thing anyone can see here dumbfuck, is just how stupid and dishonest you are.

Analyzing voting patterns is not, nor has it ever been vote tampering, nor is it illegal dumbass. Just admit you lied, it's that simple. Nicklaus was not granted immunity in any case that invilved any vote tampering. She was involved in a case that had to do with doing campaign work on public time.
 

Forum List

Back
Top