Will The Democrats Finally Admit They Are a Socialist Party?

[kaz]

Some of the problems with Social Security: it was fashioned during the Great Depression and FDR did not want to pull too much money from the economy, two he didn't want it to be a socialist program but rather one in which the people financed it not the government. Three, FDR did not want the Republicans to be able to cancel it when they regained office. The program also had to stop the Townsend plan and other ideas that were gaining backers, and finally in a democracy the government seldom creates a perfect program, in that it must have some appeal to both sides of the Congress.

And, your conclusion, Perry?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

One of the benefits of the time passed is that the old Republican cry of "socialism leads to communism" is no longer a Republican battle cry, as it now seems most Americans no longer accept that concept.

you mean Democrats actually have said how big they want the govt to be???

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

One of the benefits of the time passed is that the old Republican cry of "socialism leads to communism" is no longer a Republican battle cry, as it now seems most Americans no longer accept that concept.

you mean Democrats actually have said how big they want the govt to be??
Interesting, Bush introduced the first $2 and $3 trillion budgets, Obama is at $4 trillion and now Hilary and Sanders want far bigger still!

What does that teach a liberal fool??[/QUOTE]

 

[Programmer]

Liberals and socialists are different.

When will you admit that some socialist polices are the main stay of civilization??? We wouldn't have civilization without them.

Sure but they have to be chosen by free will.
Anyone is free to enroll in a school that has certain policies,
and if you disagree then you go to a different school.

Why can't parties set up their own statewide and national programs
for members who can voluntarily CHOOSE to fund, participate and live by their own mandates.

Why subject other people to rules and terms of membership they don't consent to?

The same way capitalism is abused to force consequences onto people
against their will, socialism is opposed for the same reasons: nobody wants
a different small elite group to dictate their policies for them! Everyone wants
to be part of group they trust to represent their values. So let each have their own.

Ponzi requires participation. The United State requires one government.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. The United State requires one government.

yes, but its supposed to be one tiny Republican federal govt, not a big national Democratic govt!!.

 

[Programmer]

. The United State requires one government.

yes, but its supposed to be one tiny Republican federal govt, not a big national Democratic govt!!.

The constitution calls for a proportional government.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. The United State requires one government.

yes, but its supposed to be one tiny Republican federal govt, not a big national Democratic govt!!.

The constitution calls for a proportional government.

most importantly it calls for very very tiny Republican govt.. Why do you think liberals spied for Stalin and Hitler and gave Stalin the bomb??

Do you understand??

 

[Programmer]

. The United State requires one government.

yes, but its supposed to be one tiny Republican federal govt, not a big national Democratic govt!!.

The constitution calls for a proportional government.

most importantly it calls for very very tiny Republican govt.. Why do you think liberals spied for Stalin and Hitler and gave Stalin the bomb??

Do you understand??

Where?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Where?

100% stupid and liberal as always!! Article 1 Section 8; they are called enumerated powers

isn't learning your ABC's fun??

 

[danielpalos]

One of the benefits of the time passed is that the old Republican cry of "socialism leads to communism" is no longer a Republican battle cry, as it now seems most Americans no longer accept that concept.

you mean Democrats actually have said how big they want the govt to be???

some on the left want to simplify government to lower our tax burden.

 

[danielpalos]

Where?

100% stupid and liberal as always!! Article 1 Section 8; they are called enumerated powers

isn't learning your ABC's fun??

dear, a general government for a Union is not tiny.

 

[Staidhup]

Funny even the head to DNC cant explain how Bernie can be a socialist and running as a Democrat nor the difference between the socialist point of view and platform of the DNC. Apparently there isn't a difference?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

a general government for a Union is not tiny.

the govt our Founders created was 1% the size of today's on a inflation adjusted per capita basis,i.e., it was tiny.

See why we say a liberal will be stupid? Is any other conclusion possible?

 

[Indeependent]

a general government for a Union is not tiny.

the govt our Founders created was 1% the size of today's on a inflation adjusted per capita basis,i.e., it was tiny.

See why we say a liberal will be stupid? Is any other conclusion possible?

Big enough to send Thomas Jefferson to France from 1784-1789 to get some pussy.
But he deserved some relief after the Revolution.

 

[Rustic]

The goal of socialism is communism.
-Vladimir Lenin-
That is all there is to socialism...

 

[Programmer]

Where?

100% stupid and liberal as always!! Article 1 Section 8; they are called enumerated powers

isn't learning your ABC's fun??

Quote the law.

 

[francoHFW]

Socialism is always democratic, communism NEVER, cold war dinosaur? Rushbot whatever?.

 

[francoHFW]

a general government for a Union is not tiny.

the govt our Founders created was 1% the size of today's on a inflation adjusted per capita basis,i.e., it was tiny.

See why we say a liberal will be stupid? Is any other conclusion possible?

As if the Booshes and Reagan didn't grow the gov't and debt more than anyone. In good times.

 

[Rustic]

Socialism is always democratic, communism NEVER, cold war dinosaur? Rushbot whatever?.

In real world application socialism has never worked long term, it always runs out of other people's money.

Getting along is always overrated, just look at this forum...ain't this fun??

 

[Rustic]

a general government for a Union is not tiny.

the govt our Founders created was 1% the size of today's on a inflation adjusted per capita basis,i.e., it was tiny.

See why we say a liberal will be stupid? Is any other conclusion possible?

As if the Booshes and Reagan didn't grow the gov't and debt more than anyone. In good times.

Progressives tend to do that...