- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,429
- 142,931
- 2,615
Dont you get it RW?
She does not need to release the information...and as the former speaker, she knows she cant.
And your attitude is exactly why she idd it the way she did it.....now people see Newt as hiding something.
He has an uphill battle...and he eartned it with his ethics violation..
But in the meantime, we have a house minority leader, former speaker, possibly future speaker who played a political game for political expediency with information that she gathered while on the peoples payroll.
Such would result in termination of that employee in the private sector..and rightfully so.
Curious...does it nbot concern you that she may have as much damning information on some of our other law makers that are part of the demoicratic party and uses it to force their hands when it comes to legislation?
In my eyes, she has proven to not be trusted.
And if Newt does not come clean, he could also not be trusted.
But she is still writing our laws....he is not.
Newts ethical violations will now become the 800 lb gorilla in the room. The more Newt tries to say he has confidentiality protections, the more guilty he will seem
Newt can run, but he can't hide. The more he declines comment, the more people will use their imaginations about what really happened
His ethics file will be released one way or another.....and Pelosi got the ball rolling
Bring on the Princess and let's vet her! It's about time. She has nothing to hide, right? LOL!
When Pelosi runs for President you can go after her
Until that time, it is between her and her district