Why would Obama approve a LIE that he knew was a lie???

[Mac1958]

.

If there's proof that Obama approved the words, then he's busted, big time, easy call.

If there is not, this can be nothing more than partisan conjecture.

And yes, unapproved promo material of all kinds runs regularly. There's no certainty that it has been signed off on by the subject. In fact, it doesn't even need to be promo material. Error-filled stuff is run all the time.

.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's how he got into college

 

[The T]

.

If there's proof that Obama approved the words, then he's busted, big time, easy call.

If there is not, this can be nothing more than partisan conjecture.

And yes, unapproved promo material of all kinds runs regularly. There's no certainty that it has been signed off on by the subject. In fact, it doesn't even need to be promo material. Error-filled stuff is run all the time.

.

So where are the lawsuits for the errors? Liability?

 

[Mac1958]

.

If there's proof that Obama approved the words, then he's busted, big time, easy call.

If there is not, this can be nothing more than partisan conjecture.

And yes, unapproved promo material of all kinds runs regularly. There's no certainty that it has been signed off on by the subject. In fact, it doesn't even need to be promo material. Error-filled stuff is run all the time.

.

So where are the lawsuits for the errors? Liability?

Not sure what you mean.

.

 

[Seawytch]

And the birthers, in their dying throes, found...

TYPO-gate! {insert dramatic music here}

 

[The T]

.

If there's proof that Obama approved the words, then he's busted, big time, easy call.

If there is not, this can be nothing more than partisan conjecture.

And yes, unapproved promo material of all kinds runs regularly. There's no certainty that it has been signed off on by the subject. In fact, it doesn't even need to be promo material. Error-filled stuff is run all the time.

.

So where are the lawsuits for the errors? Liability?

Not sure what you mean.

.

If there is material out there that is filled with errors...where is the proof-reading? This material had to be vetted, no? Who's responsible for it?

 

[Vel]

.

If there's proof that Obama approved the words, then he's busted, big time, easy call.

If there is not, this can be nothing more than partisan conjecture.

And yes, unapproved promo material of all kinds runs regularly. There's no certainty that it has been signed off on by the subject. In fact, it doesn't even need to be promo material. Error-filled stuff is run all the time.

.

The fact that this booklet was published in 1991 and then updated multiple times until 2007 as he accomplished new things show that he was either clueless or using the false information to enhance the image of himself as a sophisticated internationalist. The Chicago paper referred to him as the Kenyan born Obama when he won his U.S Senate seat. He allowed this misinformation to stay because it suited him to do so. There is no way that a politician is not going to read the newspaper accounts of their elections. He spent 25 years allowing false stories about his birth out there and then cries racism when people believe them.

 

[Mac1958]

So where are the lawsuits for the errors? Liability?

Not sure what you mean.

.

If there is material out there that is filled with errors...where is the proof-reading? This material had to be vetted, no? Who's responsible for it?

Well first, I wouldn't assume proof-reading or fact-checking in pretty much anything, ever, period. The Houston Chronicle once did a piece on me that was correct in my quotes, but the credentials they cited on me were so far off as to be funny. No damage done, but a quick fact-checking phone call would have avoided that. The piece that includes Obama isn't exactly an important publication. Vetting? Not necessarily, and not even close.

I don't know who is responsible. Could Obama have approved it directly? Sure. Or could he have allowed it to continue for his personal agenda? You bet. But there has to be some kind of proof of that, dontcha think?

.

 

[Stephanie]

And the birthers, in their dying throes, found...

TYPO-gate! {insert dramatic music here}

oh brother...

 

[The T]

Not sure what you mean.

.

If there is material out there that is filled with errors...where is the proof-reading? This material had to be vetted, no? Who's responsible for it?

Well first, I wouldn't assume proof-reading or fact-checking in pretty much anything, ever, period. The Houston Chronicle once did a piece on me that was correct in my quotes, but the credentials they cited on me were so far off as to be funny. No damage done, but a quick fact-checking phone call would have avoided that. The piece that includes Obama isn't exactly an important publication. Vetting? Not necessarily, and not even close.

I don't know who is responsible. Could Obama have approved it directly? Sure. Or could he have allowed it to continue for his personal agenda? You bet. But there has to be some kind of proof of that, dontcha think?

.

And we've heard many versions of Obama's truth. Which is real? Easy. Deeds.

 

[Douger]

He was just following orders.

 

[konradv]

.

If there's proof that Obama approved the words, then he's busted, big time, easy call.

If there is not, this can be nothing more than partisan conjecture.

And yes, unapproved promo material of all kinds runs regularly. There's no certainty that it has been signed off on by the subject. In fact, it doesn't even need to be promo material. Error-filled stuff is run all the time.

.

So where are the lawsuits for the errors? Liability?

Liability for what? You have to show harm. He doesn't seem to be hurting and that's what's getting to you, eh?

 

[RockyRacoon]

When Bush took office there were still "projected" surpluses over the next 10 years of 5 trillion dollars. Instead of paying down the debt or maintaining that projected surplus for a rainy day, such as the dotcom bubble bursting, he cut taxes and put this country right back in the red. Then along came 9/11. Bush and his administration knew something was afoot but did nothing to prevent it. As far as a 2 trillion dollar price tag (which some economist put at 3 trillion), that was because of Bush's escalation of the "war on terror" by invading Iraq. Not only did he not put it on the books but for the first time in our history he cut taxes during a time of war. Of course no lies were told to get us into that war. We could talk about his budget busting expansion of Medicare and the development of an entirely new department of the government. Obama has already created more jobs than Bush did in his entire presidency and if it wasn't for republican governors slashing public sector jobs all across the country the unemployment rate would be quite a bit lower.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

So, you're saying that Obama's former literary agency is lying when it says it was a mistake and Obama had nothing to do with it?

'Born in Kenya': Obama's Literary Agent Misidentified His Birthplace in 1991 - ABC News

This man's entire life seems to be a lie...

 

[The T]

So, you're saying that Obama's former literary agency is lying when it says it was a mistake and Obama had nothing to do with it?

'Born in Kenya': Obama's Literary Agent Misidentified His Birthplace in 1991 - ABC News

This man's entire life seems to be a lie...

Depending on which version you read or hear...

 

[gallantwarrior]

When Bush took office there were still "projected" surpluses over the next 10 years of 5 trillion dollars. Instead of paying down the debt or maintaining that projected surplus for a rainy day, such as the dotcom bubble bursting, he cut taxes and put this country right back in the red. Then along came 9/11. Bush and his administration knew something was afoot but did nothing to prevent it. As far as a 2 trillion dollar price tag (which some economist put at 3 trillion), that was because of Bush's escalation of the "war on terror" by invading Iraq. Not only did he not put it on the books but for the first time in our history he cut taxes during a time of war. Of course no lies were told to get us into that war. We could talk about his budget busting expansion of Medicare and the development of an entirely new department of the government. Obama has already created more jobs than Bush did in his entire presidency and if it wasn't for republican governors slashing public sector jobs all across the country the unemployment rate would be quite a bit lower.

Deflection. The OP is about obama's lies, not your opinions about what Bush may, or may not have done.

 

[Sallow]

"Bush Lied People died"

How many times did we hear that?

While Bush "may" have lied it certainly wasn't a LIE that would personally benefit Bush.

Unlike Obama who ALLOWED this publication to tout his Kenyan birth to sell books.. a gross venial money grubbing tactic Bush's lie was in the nation's interest and ONLY the extremist Bush bashers could find some linkage of personal gain from the "possibility" of any lies Bush may have told.

But OBAMA??? Very clear tactic of deceit.
And those die hard kook aid Obama fools don't see any thing wrong with Obama lying!

But it is those independents that voted for Obama primarily BECAUSE he was black.. they should be the ones that will make a difference!
If they now UNDERSTAND just because Obama is black IS not a good enough reason to be President!

Obama lied about health care.. and now people health care costs are going up dramatically.
Obama said you'd be able to keep your plan, your doctor... tell that to the 30% of businesses that are dropping their health plans!

Obama lied about energy costs. Everytime he uses that cliched, worn out comment.. "the USA has just 2% of proven reserves but uses 20% of world's production"... OUT AND OUT LIE!
There are enough discovered reserves alone on Federal lands that Obama has drastically reduced leasing to equal Saudia Arabia's reserves!

And that you independent voters has hit you in the pocketbook everytime you pump gas!

You are feeling the AFFECT of Obama's lies!

And our country is being destroyed by Obama's lies!

Who died?

 

[Sallow]

When Bush took office there were still "projected" surpluses over the next 10 years of 5 trillion dollars. Instead of paying down the debt or maintaining that projected surplus for a rainy day, such as the dotcom bubble bursting, he cut taxes and put this country right back in the red. Then along came 9/11. Bush and his administration knew something was afoot but did nothing to prevent it. As far as a 2 trillion dollar price tag (which some economist put at 3 trillion), that was because of Bush's escalation of the "war on terror" by invading Iraq. Not only did he not put it on the books but for the first time in our history he cut taxes during a time of war. Of course no lies were told to get us into that war. We could talk about his budget busting expansion of Medicare and the development of an entirely new department of the government. Obama has already created more jobs than Bush did in his entire presidency and if it wasn't for republican governors slashing public sector jobs all across the country the unemployment rate would be quite a bit lower.

Deflection. The OP is about obama's lies, not your opinions about what Bush may, or may not have done.

Obama didn't lie.

 

[The T]

When Bush took office there were still "projected" surpluses over the next 10 years of 5 trillion dollars. Instead of paying down the debt or maintaining that projected surplus for a rainy day, such as the dotcom bubble bursting, he cut taxes and put this country right back in the red. Then along came 9/11. Bush and his administration knew something was afoot but did nothing to prevent it. As far as a 2 trillion dollar price tag (which some economist put at 3 trillion), that was because of Bush's escalation of the "war on terror" by invading Iraq. Not only did he not put it on the books but for the first time in our history he cut taxes during a time of war. Of course no lies were told to get us into that war. We could talk about his budget busting expansion of Medicare and the development of an entirely new department of the government. Obama has already created more jobs than Bush did in his entire presidency and if it wasn't for republican governors slashing public sector jobs all across the country the unemployment rate would be quite a bit lower.

Deflection. The OP is about obama's lies, not your opinions about what Bush may, or may not have done.

Obama didn't lie.

he lies at every stop he makes on his 'Campaign Trail Of American Destruction'.

Foward my ass. Try 'Continue'.

 

[healthmyths]

When Bush took office there were still "projected" surpluses over the next 10 years of 5 trillion dollars. Instead of paying down the debt or maintaining that projected surplus for a rainy day, such as the dotcom bubble bursting, he cut taxes and put this country right back in the red. Then along came 9/11. Bush and his administration knew something was afoot but did nothing to prevent it. As far as a 2 trillion dollar price tag (which some economist put at 3 trillion), that was because of Bush's escalation of the "war on terror" by invading Iraq. Not only did he not put it on the books but for the first time in our history he cut taxes during a time of war. Of course no lies were told to get us into that war. We could talk about his budget busting expansion of Medicare and the development of an entirely new department of the government. Obama has already created more jobs than Bush did in his entire presidency and if it wasn't for republican governors slashing public sector jobs all across the country the unemployment rate would be quite a bit lower.

1) The so-called "surplus"??? Was immediately eliminated because of the $5 trillion dot.com bust that the party hearty Clinton admin.. touted!
That caused a $200 billion a year loss in tax revenue and if you were smart enough you'd at least agree there.. but you're NOT... It's called NOL by IRS !
2 Right.. BUSH knew ALL along about Osama/9/11 you f...ing idiot! YOU never heard I'm sure of the Gorelick Memo??? Which forced the CIA NOT to share with FBI Clinton's Chinese donations for missile secrets?? Of course not because you are stupid and due to that Gorelick Memo the 9/11 commission said the 9/11 bombers identified by CIA couldn't be shared with FBI... so tell me again dumb f...k!
Oh at that event cost $2 trillion from 18,000 destroyed businesses/airlines not flying/Wall street shut down... but of course ALL OF THAT IS BUSH's FAULT.. RIGHT!!!!!!

3) Oh right.. Bush being the GOD he ordered the worst hurricane seasons in history!
Another $1 trillion in losses, 500,000 jobs.. BUT right ALL BUSH's fault!

Dumb dumb dumb dumb!!!!
But idiots LIKE you will NEVER have the integrity to admit THE ABOVE TRUTHS!
Primarily because you weren't HERE! YOU don't know these events because YOU are not Americans. YOU are traitors. YOU loved seeing troops being killed !
YOU are happy when the USA is blamed for everything!