Obama claims he is NOT a big spender???

clevergirl

Gold Member
Oct 22, 2009
2,721
554
153
How can this president think this new whopper will be believed? Well, just read some of his defenders on this very board! BTW in case you don't read the entire artricle or check out the embedded links- at least check this one "Federal Budget In Pictures" out. There are like 6 charts- just hit "next chart" to go through each of them.


There are some things that are so apparent that they’re not even worth mentioning. What goes up must come down. The earth is round. President Barack Obama is a big spender. But this week, some in the media and in the White House are denying one of these totally obvious truths. It shouldn’t be a big surprise which one it is.

On Tuesday, MarketWatch’s Rex Nutting wrote that claims of Obama’s big spending ways are overblown and that the “Obama spending binge never happened.” In a press gaggle on Wednesday, White House spokesman Jay Carney picked up on the argument and claimed that “this President has been–has demonstrated significant fiscal restraint and acted with great fiscal responsibility.”

But sure as the sun rises in the east, not in the west, claims of Obama’s supposed “fiscal restraint” are just plain wrong. Heritage’s J.D. Foster explains:

Federal spending as a share of the economy will average over 24 percent during Obama’s term, and each and every year of that term will see a higher share than during any year since the Second World War. That apparently qualifies as ‘significant fiscal restraint’ Obama-style.

Fiscal responsibility? Obama has had by far the largest budget deficits, driven in large part by the eruption in spending.

Heritage’s Alison Fraser and Emily Goff thoroughly dismantle of the Nutting-Carney claim and point out that President Obama’s near-trillion-dollar stimulus “drove spending to a record 25.2 percent of the economy in 2009 and deficits topped $1 trillion for the first time in the nation’s history.”

read more
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6bmEv2-rFA]President Bush's speech on the financial crisis 9/24/08 (1) - YouTube[/ame]
 
Don't try to inerject truth.
The radical right would much preffer we just assume their delusions are truth and move on.
 
Did the $5 trillion in Dot.com bust happen or not.
Did 9/11 happen at a cost of $2 trillion?
Did worst hurricane seasons happen 2003-2008?

Obviously it did!
But almost NO ONE seems to recognize that the $8 trillion in losses means the US treasury
is NOT collecting $300 billion in tax revenue!
These are FACTS...
Yet idiots blame Bush for events he HAD no control over!
Blame Bush for spending like a Drunken sailor .. WITH NO FACTS to substantiate that!

BUT Obama??? WE know as a Senator he approved the spending! Approved Tarp.
So if he says it's all Bush's fault... THEN how can Obama take CREDIT if any for the recovery that he
says was Bush's spending???
 
Democrats believe that if obama says it, it's true. Most people aren't that gullible. They know better.
 
I don't believe jack shit any politician says. If one told me the sky was blue, I would start looking for conformation.

This is why I would make a poor Democrat.
 
New Spending - Bush $5.07 Trillion
Obama - $1.44 Trillion (includes estimates through 2017)


Numbers don't lie, Democrats do..

LOL, did you bother to look at how they falsified their report? They added all of the spending in Obama's first year, including the Stimulus onto Bush's column.

It’s been breaking news all over MSNBC, liberal blogs, newspapers and even The Wall Street Journal: “Federal spending under Obama at historic lows … It’s clear that Obama has been the most fiscally moderate president we’ve had in 60 years.” There’s even a chart!

I’ll pause here to give you a moment to mop up the coffee on your keyboard. Good? OK, moving on

Read more: Numbers don't lie, but Democrats do
 
Last edited:
How can this president think this new whopper will be believed?
read more

No one believes it. No one that is that doesn't completely have their head buried so far up odumbo's ass that they can't think.

All you have to do is take a look at this, and it's clear that odumbo has spent more money than any other president in history, and most of them all put together...

>>>>>Real Time US Debt Clock<<<<<

To deny the fact that Ovomit has added more to that debt clock since he took office than any other president is nothing short of a GARGANTUAN LIE. We've all WATCHED IT, we've LIVED THROUGH IT, we WITNESSED IT, and we're not going to listen to ODUMBOBOTS try and LIE their filthy little CAKE HOLES OFF that he didn't. It's right there in front our faces for the entire WORLD to see, so there is NO DENYING IT.
 
hey that unfair your using facts

TDM's definition of "facts"... any word(s) spoken or written by a progressive or a liberal whether or not such word(s) have any basis in reality.

For instance: if rdean types, "unicorns are alive and well in the heart of Africa", TDM will defend this statement as "fact". On the other hand, if The Rabbi types, "unicorns are alive and well in the heart of Africa", TDM will declare he is a liar and probably demand links proving it.

Immie
 
The obamabots on this board are just that, bots. No matter how badly Ron Paul was doing, paulbots always insisted he was going to win the election by a landslide. That's what bots do.

obama is not defending his record. He's denying his record exists. Most people see through that even when obamabots insist that he's telling the truth.

obama is running headlong into another problem of his own making. He is becoming boring. Since he has no record to run on his entire camaign is based on the premise that Romney is bad. It's all he can talk about. The failed policies of the past. Those policies are pollicies of free market capitalism. They made us the most successful and powerful country in the world. His real complaint is that we are the most successful and powerful country in the world. His invitation is that you join with him to change that.
 
obama-china-debt-holder.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top