Why Would Holocaust Deniers Lie.

I think you'll find we looked to ancient Greece as the foundation of Western civilisation, but hey, you must read some weird history books...oh, and Harry Elmer Barnes (author of The History of Western Civilisation) was an American anti-Semite. Always happy to help. :)

In fact----in the standard texts-----Egypt and Sumeria are cited as-------the early foundation----then we move onto Greece----in the standard British version of the
history of western civilization------but those civilizations are represented almost
as a "fairy tale"------something like "way back in the era of myths" ------no matter
that an American wrote a history------he still writes from the POV---of british "historians" Try looking into a standard high school history text------cups of tea
all but fall out of the book when you open it. Real "modern" history----is presented
as BEGINNING IN ROME------(remember? "ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME").

As I said, you must read some weird history books.
 
The point is that the goal of the Nazis was to expel the Jews. Not exterminate them.

Up to 1939, maybe. But then after invading Poland, France, Belgium the Netherlands, Greece, Yugoslavia and later the Soviet Union, the nazis suddenly found themselves hving to deal with the bulk of Europe's Jewish population. Epic fail on the expulsion front, don't you think? So if you can't expel them....let's go have chat about it...I know a nice villa near Wannsee...

Adolf expressed his desire to exterminate jews in his famous sequel to the
koran----Mein Kampf,
 
I think you'll find we looked to ancient Greece as the foundation of Western civilisation, but hey, you must read some weird history books...oh, and Harry Elmer Barnes (author of The History of Western Civilisation) was an American anti-Semite. Always happy to help. :)

In fact----in the standard texts-----Egypt and Sumeria are cited as-------the early foundation----then we move onto Greece----in the standard British version of the
history of western civilization------but those civilizations are represented almost
as a "fairy tale"------something like "way back in the era of myths" ------no matter
that an American wrote a history------he still writes from the POV---of british "historians" Try looking into a standard high school history text------cups of tea
all but fall out of the book when you open it. Real "modern" history----is presented
as BEGINNING IN ROME------(remember? "ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME").

As I said, you must read some weird history books.

no----I got the standard stuff-------
 
The Romans were indeed pretty fucked up..

Compared to who, exactly?

compared to WHOM.......... well----at that time? -----compared to the Zoroastrians
of Iran------and the Buddhists of Afghanistan-------and the Tahitians of Tahiti ---assuming there were some

I.e. nobody worth mentioning.

You actually believe that the cultures of BUDDHISTs---2000 years ago
and Zoroastrians 2000 years ago are not "worth mentioning"? You have
a very skewed understanding of human history and development. I do
understand-----you have been brainwashed by the BRITISH WORLD
VIEW. An interesting factoid----it is the British who wrote "THE HISTORY
OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION" it was done in a very very ethnocentric
manner------If you review----you will find that according to tea sipping armchair
"historians"-------History starts 2000 years ago IN ROME and almost instantly
MOVES to the British Isles

Excuse me for butting in, but people 2000 years ago were pretty fucked up. And today, followers of any religion are fucked up. Especially muslims, Buddhists and Hindus. All you have to do is look at their civilization to see the results of it.
 
The point is that the goal of the Nazis was to expel the Jews. Not exterminate them.

Up to 1939, maybe. But then after invading Poland, France, Belgium the Netherlands, Greece, Yugoslavia and later the Soviet Union, the nazis suddenly found themselves hving to deal with the bulk of Europe's Jewish population. Epic fail on the expulsion front, don't you think? So if you can't expel them....let's go have chat about it...I know a nice villa near Wannsee...

And how were they supposedly killed. I have no doubt that some were. But most likely not as many as the Jews or the Allied victors would like people to think. And it is absolutely certain that they weren't gassed. So where does that leave your brainwashed ideas.
 
I know you never described them as "drunken fucks." I was just having a bit of fun at your expense.

I am sorry to know that fact about you------Long ago----when I was a teen in high school-------the school LOCKED the girls' lavatory----during the day-----opened only during lunchtime-------the reason was that there were snotty sluts who used
to hang out near the TOILETS----to smoke and to mock any ordinary girl who walked in. I was horrified- ------a little verbal attack by snotty sluts with a perverted sense of fun,,,,,, was far better than URGENCY

What the hell are you talking about.

I was referring to your perverted sense of "fun"

Well you were the one who called Northern Europeans a bunch of drunkards.

no-----I did not call northern Europeans "a bunch of drunkards"------I cited a bit of actual information on prevalence of alcoholism in various populations. In the USA there is a very high prevalence of alcoholism in both black americans and in
Native americans. It is notable that alcoholism is relatively rare in
American Italians and American jews. Some people have attributed those stats
to the fact that both Italians and jews do not MYSTIFY wine

irosie91,
Any drinkenness probably has more to do with culture than it does to genetics. Also, you know that I hate Jews right down to their core. But I have to hand it to the Jew doctor or student doctor who recently who tried to stop a negroid from abducting a drunk White woman off the street. Though obviously, he probably didn't think he would get shot. He was lucky to have lived. But with all the racemixing and multiethnic bullshit the Jews try to sell to the American public, if he had been murdered, it would have been poetic justice.
 
The point is that the goal of the Nazis was to expel the Jews. Not exterminate them.

Up to 1939, maybe. But then after invading Poland, France, Belgium the Netherlands, Greece, Yugoslavia and later the Soviet Union, the nazis suddenly found themselves hving to deal with the bulk of Europe's Jewish population. Epic fail on the expulsion front, don't you think? So if you can't expel them....let's go have chat about it...I know a nice villa near Wannsee...

Adolf expressed his desire to exterminate jews in his famous sequel to the
koran----Mein Kampf,

I've never read Mein Kampf. So I only have your word to go by. Which, coming from a Jew, is utterly worthless. But despite what Hitler may or may not have written, exterminating Jews isn't what he did. If that was the plan, there would have been real gas chambers for something else besides clothing at Auschwitz. Also, take your koran- Mein Kampf association and stick it up your ass.
 
The point is that the goal of the Nazis was to expel the Jews. Not exterminate them.

Up to 1939, maybe. But then after invading Poland, France, Belgium the Netherlands, Greece, Yugoslavia and later the Soviet Union, the nazis suddenly found themselves hving to deal with the bulk of Europe's Jewish population. Epic fail on the expulsion front, don't you think? So if you can't expel them....let's go have chat about it...I know a nice villa near Wannsee...

Adolf expressed his desire to exterminate jews in his famous sequel to the
koran----Mein Kampf,

I've never read Mein Kampf. So I only have your word to go by. Which, coming from a Jew, is utterly worthless. But despite what Hitler may or may not have written, exterminating Jews isn't what he did. If that was the plan, there would have been real gas chambers for something else besides clothing at Auschwitz. Also, take your koran- Mein Kampf association and stick it up your ass.

I agree-----shove your stinking koran up the ass of any handy pig------or your own
 
Who would have reason to lie about the holocaust and why. If the holocaust happened as is generally believed, why would there be those who would deny it. Let's list the reasons.
1. To make money. There are people who write books or give lectures to make money by supporting all sorts of conspiracy theories. I imagine holocaust denial would fit right in.
2. To cover the guilt of having killed so many "innocent" people. Which is no reason to me. There are people out there who would say that even if 6 million Jews were killed, it wasn't nearly enough.
3. To help sell the idea of White patriotism not being so bad by saying White patriots didn't kill as many Jews as is generally believed.
4. Those who don't like the Jews would likely be interested in slandering them by saying that the Jews mostly made up the whole holocaust thing.

Now let's say that the holocaust was largely a fabrication. Why would people lie by saying that 6 million Jews were killed. Let's list those reasons.
1. For the victors to demonize their enemies is a tactic that is probably as old as mankind. A holocaust story would help do that.
2. In 1933, a London newspaper headline read, "Judea declares war on Germany." And in war it is said that truth is the first casuality. The Jews controlled the movie industry. They may have also had a major influence in the raido industry. This gave them a huge "soapbox" from which to spread their lies.
3. Jews probably sought revenge against the Germans for having dared to deport or force out the "chosen of GOD!"
4. Reparations were made by Germany for the whole holocaust thing. As far as I know, they're still being made. If the holocaust was shown to largely have been a fraud, those reparations would dry up. Jews may even have to pay most of them back.
5. The U.S. might lessen its funding of Israel. A country that it already gave nuclear weapons to.
6. By playing the "pity" card, Jews can get away with far more.
7. For many Christians, a good way to prove the power of their imaginary god is to support the Jewish people.
8. If the holocaust was ever disproved, Jews might again be persecuted.
9. National Socialism was economically sucessful. Capitalism wasn't and still isn't. To support "The American Way," it would be very helpful to discredit National Socialism in any way possible.
10. Stalin was the real monster. The holocaust and other things could be supported so the U.S. doesn't look so bad for having supported Stalin.
11. If the holocaust was shown to largely be a fraud, most people would feel extrmemly suckered. They would lose even more faith in the U.S. government.
12. German National Socialism wasn't into the whole multiethnic society thing that is constantly being shoved down Americans throats. So to support their multiethnic society, they have to discredit the White patriot national socialist party. Etc.

Keep in mind that history is written by the victors. Consider the power the U.S. government and the jews have to see that their version of history prevails. Compare to that to the power of the few who seek the truth for the truth's sake. Holocaust deniers vs holocaust promoters. Holocaust promoters have much more reason to lie.
You left out stupidity. Anyone that denies the holocaust never happened has some screws loose.

Not at all.

Muslims know that the major reason the Zionist nation was formed after the war was due to the sufferings they encountered during the Holocaust. So what do they do, deny it ever happened and insist the Zionists give up their home land.

It's really just that simple.
 
I am sorry to know that fact about you------Long ago----when I was a teen in high school-------the school LOCKED the girls' lavatory----during the day-----opened only during lunchtime-------the reason was that there were snotty sluts who used
to hang out near the TOILETS----to smoke and to mock any ordinary girl who walked in. I was horrified- ------a little verbal attack by snotty sluts with a perverted sense of fun,,,,,, was far better than URGENCY

What the hell are you talking about.

I was referring to your perverted sense of "fun"

Well you were the one who called Northern Europeans a bunch of drunkards.

no-----I did not call northern Europeans "a bunch of drunkards"------I cited a bit of actual information on prevalence of alcoholism in various populations. In the USA there is a very high prevalence of alcoholism in both black americans and in
Native americans. It is notable that alcoholism is relatively rare in
American Italians and American jews. Some people have attributed those stats
to the fact that both Italians and jews do not MYSTIFY wine

irosie91,
Any drinkenness probably has more to do with culture than it does to genetics. Also, you know that I hate Jews right down to their core. But I have to hand it to the Jew doctor or student doctor who recently who tried to stop a negroid from abducting a drunk White woman off the street. Though obviously, he probably didn't think he would get shot. He was lucky to have lived. But with all the racemixing and multiethnic bullshit the Jews try to sell to the American public, if he had been murdered, it would have been poetic justice.

for the record-----alcoholism is associated with a genetic disposition-----one of theissues is the activity of the liver enzyme group ---the Alcohol dehydrogenases---
it is also associated with the incidence of endogenous depression----another condition with a genetic predisposition
 
Who would have reason to lie about the holocaust and why. If the holocaust happened as is generally believed, why would there be those who would deny it. Let's list the reasons.
1. To make money. There are people who write books or give lectures to make money by supporting all sorts of conspiracy theories. I imagine holocaust denial would fit right in.
2. To cover the guilt of having killed so many "innocent" people. Which is no reason to me. There are people out there who would say that even if 6 million Jews were killed, it wasn't nearly enough.
3. To help sell the idea of White patriotism not being so bad by saying White patriots didn't kill as many Jews as is generally believed.
4. Those who don't like the Jews would likely be interested in slandering them by saying that the Jews mostly made up the whole holocaust thing.

Now let's say that the holocaust was largely a fabrication. Why would people lie by saying that 6 million Jews were killed. Let's list those reasons.
1. For the victors to demonize their enemies is a tactic that is probably as old as mankind. A holocaust story would help do that.
2. In 1933, a London newspaper headline read, "Judea declares war on Germany." And in war it is said that truth is the first casuality. The Jews controlled the movie industry. They may have also had a major influence in the raido industry. This gave them a huge "soapbox" from which to spread their lies.
3. Jews probably sought revenge against the Germans for having dared to deport or force out the "chosen of GOD!"
4. Reparations were made by Germany for the whole holocaust thing. As far as I know, they're still being made. If the holocaust was shown to largely have been a fraud, those reparations would dry up. Jews may even have to pay most of them back.
5. The U.S. might lessen its funding of Israel. A country that it already gave nuclear weapons to.
6. By playing the "pity" card, Jews can get away with far more.
7. For many Christians, a good way to prove the power of their imaginary god is to support the Jewish people.
8. If the holocaust was ever disproved, Jews might again be persecuted.
9. National Socialism was economically sucessful. Capitalism wasn't and still isn't. To support "The American Way," it would be very helpful to discredit National Socialism in any way possible.
10. Stalin was the real monster. The holocaust and other things could be supported so the U.S. doesn't look so bad for having supported Stalin.
11. If the holocaust was shown to largely be a fraud, most people would feel extrmemly suckered. They would lose even more faith in the U.S. government.
12. German National Socialism wasn't into the whole multiethnic society thing that is constantly being shoved down Americans throats. So to support their multiethnic society, they have to discredit the White patriot national socialist party. Etc.

Keep in mind that history is written by the victors. Consider the power the U.S. government and the jews have to see that their version of history prevails. Compare to that to the power of the few who seek the truth for the truth's sake. Holocaust deniers vs holocaust promoters. Holocaust promoters have much more reason to lie.
You left out stupidity. Anyone that denies the holocaust never happened has some screws loose.

Not at all.

Muslims know that the major reason the Zionist nation was formed after the war was due to the sufferings they encountered during the Holocaust. So what do they do, deny it ever happened and insist the Zionists give up their home land.

It's really just that simple.

wrong-----Holocaust denial dates back to the early to mid 1930s -----just when the Nazis were preparing and getting revved up-----their muslim allies embraced the idea as nothing new------they deny their own genocides of jews including the comprehensive genocide of the jews of arabia which dates back to the time of the rapist pig of mecca
 
The point is that the goal of the Nazis was to expel the Jews. Not exterminate them.

Up to 1939, maybe. But then after invading Poland, France, Belgium the Netherlands, Greece, Yugoslavia and later the Soviet Union, the nazis suddenly found themselves hving to deal with the bulk of Europe's Jewish population. Epic fail on the expulsion front, don't you think? So if you can't expel them....let's go have chat about it...I know a nice villa near Wannsee...

Adolf expressed his desire to exterminate jews in his famous sequel to the
koran----Mein Kampf,

I've never read Mein Kampf. So I only have your word to go by. Which, coming from a Jew, is utterly worthless. But despite what Hitler may or may not have written, exterminating Jews isn't what he did. If that was the plan, there would have been real gas chambers for something else besides clothing at Auschwitz. Also, take your koran- Mein Kampf association and stick it up your ass.

I agree-----shove your stinking koran up the ass of any handy pig------or your own

Why would I shove something that has absolutely nothing to do with me, such as a koran, up my ass. More appropriately, you need to shove a torah up your ass.
 
Who would have reason to lie about the holocaust and why. If the holocaust happened as is generally believed, why would there be those who would deny it. Let's list the reasons.
1. To make money. There are people who write books or give lectures to make money by supporting all sorts of conspiracy theories. I imagine holocaust denial would fit right in.
2. To cover the guilt of having killed so many "innocent" people. Which is no reason to me. There are people out there who would say that even if 6 million Jews were killed, it wasn't nearly enough.
3. To help sell the idea of White patriotism not being so bad by saying White patriots didn't kill as many Jews as is generally believed.
4. Those who don't like the Jews would likely be interested in slandering them by saying that the Jews mostly made up the whole holocaust thing.

Now let's say that the holocaust was largely a fabrication. Why would people lie by saying that 6 million Jews were killed. Let's list those reasons.
1. For the victors to demonize their enemies is a tactic that is probably as old as mankind. A holocaust story would help do that.
2. In 1933, a London newspaper headline read, "Judea declares war on Germany." And in war it is said that truth is the first casuality. The Jews controlled the movie industry. They may have also had a major influence in the raido industry. This gave them a huge "soapbox" from which to spread their lies.
3. Jews probably sought revenge against the Germans for having dared to deport or force out the "chosen of GOD!"
4. Reparations were made by Germany for the whole holocaust thing. As far as I know, they're still being made. If the holocaust was shown to largely have been a fraud, those reparations would dry up. Jews may even have to pay most of them back.
5. The U.S. might lessen its funding of Israel. A country that it already gave nuclear weapons to.
6. By playing the "pity" card, Jews can get away with far more.
7. For many Christians, a good way to prove the power of their imaginary god is to support the Jewish people.
8. If the holocaust was ever disproved, Jews might again be persecuted.
9. National Socialism was economically sucessful. Capitalism wasn't and still isn't. To support "The American Way," it would be very helpful to discredit National Socialism in any way possible.
10. Stalin was the real monster. The holocaust and other things could be supported so the U.S. doesn't look so bad for having supported Stalin.
11. If the holocaust was shown to largely be a fraud, most people would feel extrmemly suckered. They would lose even more faith in the U.S. government.
12. German National Socialism wasn't into the whole multiethnic society thing that is constantly being shoved down Americans throats. So to support their multiethnic society, they have to discredit the White patriot national socialist party. Etc.

Keep in mind that history is written by the victors. Consider the power the U.S. government and the jews have to see that their version of history prevails. Compare to that to the power of the few who seek the truth for the truth's sake. Holocaust deniers vs holocaust promoters. Holocaust promoters have much more reason to lie.
You left out stupidity. Anyone that denies the holocaust never happened has some screws loose.

Not at all.

Muslims know that the major reason the Zionist nation was formed after the war was due to the sufferings they encountered during the Holocaust. So what do they do, deny it ever happened and insist the Zionists give up their home land.

It's really just that simple.

My views on the holocaust have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with anything that any muslim might think. It has more to do with things such as the Leuchter report. Along with very many other things.
 
What the hell are you talking about.

I was referring to your perverted sense of "fun"

Well you were the one who called Northern Europeans a bunch of drunkards.

no-----I did not call northern Europeans "a bunch of drunkards"------I cited a bit of actual information on prevalence of alcoholism in various populations. In the USA there is a very high prevalence of alcoholism in both black americans and in
Native americans. It is notable that alcoholism is relatively rare in
American Italians and American jews. Some people have attributed those stats
to the fact that both Italians and jews do not MYSTIFY wine

irosie91,
Any drinkenness probably has more to do with culture than it does to genetics. Also, you know that I hate Jews right down to their core. But I have to hand it to the Jew doctor or student doctor who recently who tried to stop a negroid from abducting a drunk White woman off the street. Though obviously, he probably didn't think he would get shot. He was lucky to have lived. But with all the racemixing and multiethnic bullshit the Jews try to sell to the American public, if he had been murdered, it would have been poetic justice.

for the record-----alcoholism is associated with a genetic disposition-----one of theissues is the activity of the liver enzyme group ---the Alcohol dehydrogenases---
it is also associated with the incidence of endogenous depression----another condition with a genetic predisposition

What you say in this instance could be true. But consider this. You say that Italians aren't as alcoholic. But aren't they more prone to drink wine than those from northern Europe? Even giving it to their kids, (Though from what I have heard, they sometimes water it down) That sounds kind of alcoholic to me. Also, I heard an apparent expert say once that even if you only drank once a year, as long as you felt you NEEDED to drink that one time, you were an alcoholic. Maybe they were right and maybe they were wrong. But that's what I heard.
 
Who would have reason to lie about the holocaust and why. If the holocaust happened as is generally believed, why would there be those who would deny it. Let's list the reasons.
1. To make money. There are people who write books or give lectures to make money by supporting all sorts of conspiracy theories. I imagine holocaust denial would fit right in.
2. To cover the guilt of having killed so many "innocent" people. Which is no reason to me. There are people out there who would say that even if 6 million Jews were killed, it wasn't nearly enough.
3. To help sell the idea of White patriotism not being so bad by saying White patriots didn't kill as many Jews as is generally believed.
4. Those who don't like the Jews would likely be interested in slandering them by saying that the Jews mostly made up the whole holocaust thing.

Now let's say that the holocaust was largely a fabrication. Why would people lie by saying that 6 million Jews were killed. Let's list those reasons.
1. For the victors to demonize their enemies is a tactic that is probably as old as mankind. A holocaust story would help do that.
2. In 1933, a London newspaper headline read, "Judea declares war on Germany." And in war it is said that truth is the first casuality. The Jews controlled the movie industry. They may have also had a major influence in the raido industry. This gave them a huge "soapbox" from which to spread their lies.
3. Jews probably sought revenge against the Germans for having dared to deport or force out the "chosen of GOD!"
4. Reparations were made by Germany for the whole holocaust thing. As far as I know, they're still being made. If the holocaust was shown to largely have been a fraud, those reparations would dry up. Jews may even have to pay most of them back.
5. The U.S. might lessen its funding of Israel. A country that it already gave nuclear weapons to.
6. By playing the "pity" card, Jews can get away with far more.
7. For many Christians, a good way to prove the power of their imaginary god is to support the Jewish people.
8. If the holocaust was ever disproved, Jews might again be persecuted.
9. National Socialism was economically sucessful. Capitalism wasn't and still isn't. To support "The American Way," it would be very helpful to discredit National Socialism in any way possible.
10. Stalin was the real monster. The holocaust and other things could be supported so the U.S. doesn't look so bad for having supported Stalin.
11. If the holocaust was shown to largely be a fraud, most people would feel extrmemly suckered. They would lose even more faith in the U.S. government.
12. German National Socialism wasn't into the whole multiethnic society thing that is constantly being shoved down Americans throats. So to support their multiethnic society, they have to discredit the White patriot national socialist party. Etc.

Keep in mind that history is written by the victors. Consider the power the U.S. government and the jews have to see that their version of history prevails. Compare to that to the power of the few who seek the truth for the truth's sake. Holocaust deniers vs holocaust promoters. Holocaust promoters have much more reason to lie.
You left out stupidity. Anyone that denies the holocaust never happened has some screws loose.

Not at all.

Muslims know that the major reason the Zionist nation was formed after the war was due to the sufferings they encountered during the Holocaust. So what do they do, deny it ever happened and insist the Zionists give up their home land.

It's really just that simple.

wrong-----Holocaust denial dates back to the early to mid 1930s -----just when the Nazis were preparing and getting revved up-----their muslim allies embraced the idea as nothing new------they deny their own genocides of jews including the comprehensive genocide of the jews of arabia which dates back to the time of the rapist pig of mecca

How can a muslim or anybody deny something that hadn't happened yet. But as far as something bad happening to 6 million Jews, that does go back farther. Just look at these newspaper articles. And you could fault anybody for calling bullshit on the holocaust 6 million figure?
6 million Jews bullshit 1.jpg
6 million Jews bullshit 2.jpg
6 million Jews bullshit 3.jpg
6 million Jews bullshit 4.jpg
 
I was referring to your perverted sense of "fun"

Well you were the one who called Northern Europeans a bunch of drunkards.

no-----I did not call northern Europeans "a bunch of drunkards"------I cited a bit of actual information on prevalence of alcoholism in various populations. In the USA there is a very high prevalence of alcoholism in both black americans and in
Native americans. It is notable that alcoholism is relatively rare in
American Italians and American jews. Some people have attributed those stats
to the fact that both Italians and jews do not MYSTIFY wine

irosie91,
Any drinkenness probably has more to do with culture than it does to genetics. Also, you know that I hate Jews right down to their core. But I have to hand it to the Jew doctor or student doctor who recently who tried to stop a negroid from abducting a drunk White woman off the street. Though obviously, he probably didn't think he would get shot. He was lucky to have lived. But with all the racemixing and multiethnic bullshit the Jews try to sell to the American public, if he had been murdered, it would have been poetic justice.

for the record-----alcoholism is associated with a genetic disposition-----one of theissues is the activity of the liver enzyme group ---the Alcohol dehydrogenases---
it is also associated with the incidence of endogenous depression----another condition with a genetic predisposition

What you say in this instance could be true. But consider this. You say that Italians aren't as alcoholic. But aren't they more prone to drink wine than those from northern Europe? Even giving it to their kids, (Though from what I have heard, they sometimes water it down) That sounds kind of alcoholic to me. Also, I heard an apparent expert say once that even if you only drank once a year, as long as you felt you NEEDED to drink that one time, you were an alcoholic. Maybe they were right and maybe they were wrong. But that's what I heard.

your post indicates that you are an idiot. A to the "experts" you "Hear" try to ignore those mutterings at the methadone clinic
 
Jews in Western Europe suffered horribly for centuries. They were made to wear special cloths and symbols, kicked out of entire countries, put in ghettos and rounded up and killed. All of the oppression you saw in Nazi Germany had already been done to the European Jew, but on a larger scale.

This is all well documented.

Jews would have to be crazy to give up their homeland.
 
Jews in Western Europe suffered horribly for centuries. They were made to wear special cloths and symbols, kicked out of entire countries, put in ghettos and rounded up and killed. All of the oppression you saw in Nazi Germany had already been done to the European Jew, but on a larger scale.

This is all well documented.

Jews would have to be crazy to give up their homeland.

well-----not exactly-------it is true that the legal code that ADOLF used to legalize
genocide of jews was nothing new-------in fact it was invented by CONSTANTINE----
emperor of Rome----300 AD--------the jerk who vilified the "pharasees" in his NT
to justify his Nazi filth--------BUT the Nazis did it more efficiently
 
Jews in Western Europe suffered horribly for centuries. They were made to wear special cloths and symbols, kicked out of entire countries, put in ghettos and rounded up and killed. All of the oppression you saw in Nazi Germany had already been done to the European Jew, but on a larger scale.

This is all well documented.

Jews would have to be crazy to give up their homeland.

well-----not exactly-------it is true that the legal code that ADOLF used to legalize
genocide of jews was nothing new-------in fact it was invented by CONSTANTINE----
emperor of Rome----300 AD--------the jerk who vilified the "pharasees" in his NT
to justify his Nazi filth--------BUT the Nazis did it more efficiently

Constantine was not even a Christian, although it was rumored he converted on his death bed.

Constantine was nothing more than a warmongering statist. Perhaps this is why Constantine left out the book of Enoch from his Bible, because the book of Enoch has many verses condemning the kings and nations of the earth in regard to their treatment of it's citizens and the poor and how they will all be judged and condemned to an everlasting hell.
 
Constantine was not even a Christian, although it was rumored he converted on his death bed. Constantine was nothing more than a warmongering statist. Perhaps this is why Constantine left out the book of Enoch from his Bible, because the book of Enoch has many verses condemning the kings and nations of the earth in regard to their treatment of it's citizens and the poor and how they will all be judged and condemned to an everlasting hell.
Constantine didn't compile the Bible. That was done by church leaders. He didn't care what was included; he just wanted Christian against Christian violence to end. The final compilation wasn't completed until after his death anyway.
 

Forum List

Back
Top