They are busting Trump rght now in court

[Faun]

You're really not that bright.

Have you not been watching the news lately?

For starters...Jack Smith and the FBI have their ass in a sling because they've been shown to have manipulated the documents found at Mar A Lago. Sharing classified documents? You mean holding up some papers that may or may not have BEEN classified and talking about them?

It's not illegal to try and use alternate electors. Sorry but it's not.

What else would you call payments to a lawyer other than "legal services"? Paying for an NDA isn't illegal. It's done quite often.

They did not manipulate documents. That's the rightwing spin for what they actually did in a vain attempt to discard that case. All the boxes have the same documents or place holders as they did when they were first seized. Only in some of the boxes, they were not placed back in the same order.

It's very illegal to send fake electors to Congress to alter the outcome of an election. It's fraud and no candidate in the history of America ever tried a stunt like that. And because it's illegal, dozens of fake electors have been charged. So has Trump and his attorneys who came up with that scheme.

And it's not a "legal service" when it's to commit a crime.

 

[Faun]

How is your lawyer making a totally legal payment on a totally legal NDA an "illegal campaign contribution"?

Holy shit, you're in this deep.

It was illegal enough that Cohen went to jail for that, among other crimes.

 

[Slade3200]

Nope, no parrot here..what Merchan is doing, however, is just trying to silence Trump. Nothing Trump has said is detrimental to the case, he’s not speaking of case issues that are forbidden. He’s just saying how much of a scam this case is, and how much of an injustice it is, and sure, he may say the judge is corrupt. Merchan doesn’t like that so he is going to silence trump.

Trump still has free speech…even though Merchan may not like the speech, as long as trump isnt breaking any of the rules of the case, he should be allowed to speak

His gag order is preventing him from attacking witnesses and jury members in public. That’s not a special case against Trump. That’s something nobody is allowed to do and it’s totally constitutional.

Trump is under arrest

 

[postman]

LOL...seriously? Now you're claiming that Trump only ran for President because it was a legal ploy in the documents case? Jesus, Faun...what are you smoking this morning? That's stupid even for you!

Actually it was a legal ploy for all four cases. Trumps world was crashing down on him. And the only reason it didn't happen sooner is that presidents are held immune from investigation, indictment or prosecution while in office.

 

[postman]

Oh please...the IRS has been up Trump's ass for years, Postman! I'd be shocked if you could find another American who's tax returns have been more scrutinized over the past eight years than Donald Trump's!

What about Trumps first two years in office. Trumps IRS didn't even look at his tax returns, as was required by law to audit them.

Two years !!

 

[Faun]

Actually it was a legal ploy for all four cases. Trumps world was crashing down on him. And the only reason it didn't happen sooner is that presidents are held immune from investigation, indictment or prosecution while in office.

Yet another person aligned with Trump goes down. I've lost count.

Investor found guilty in Trump Media insider trading case

Bruce Garelick was among three men who were arrested and charged last June in the insider trading case

www.cbsnews.com

 

[postman]

You're really not that bright.

Have you not been watching the news lately?

For starters...Jack Smith and the FBI have their ass in a sling because they've been shown to have manipulated the documents found at Mar A Lago. Sharing classified documents? You mean holding up some papers that may or may not have BEEN classified and talking about them?

Actually that controversy is about the order of the documents found in the boxes, not the contents of the boxes.
Such as one inventory says documents A-B-C, while an inventory for discovery list the contents as documents A-C-B.

The defense claims not putting them back in the exact order they were found in, is tampering with evidence.

 

[postman]

How is your lawyer making a totally legal payment on a totally legal NDA an "illegal campaign contribution"?

It would be no different than a "perfectly legal NDA" that the person who helped you rob the bank, can't disclose any information about you.

 

[postman]

Ah yes...the 16 women who claim they were "assaulted" by Trump! What ever happened to all of those women and all of those claims that were made to smear someone running for President, Postman?

Trump said that as soon as the election was over, he was going to sue ALL SIXTEEN WOMEN.
They never backed down on their allegations, but Trump backed down from taking them to court.
And one of those women, E. Jean Carroll was able to sue under a statute of limitations law, and we saw the result of that.

 

[Man With A Plan]

They did not manipulate documents. That's the rightwing spin for what they actually did in a vain attempt to discard that case. All the boxes have the same documents or place holders as they did when they were first seized. Only in some of the boxes, they were not placed back in the same order.

It's very illegal to send fake electors to Congress to alter the outcome of an election. It's fraud and no candidate in the history of America ever tried a stunt like that. And because it's illegal, dozens of fake electors have been charged. So has Trump and his attorneys who came up with that scheme.

And it's not a "legal service" when it's to commit a crime.

You might want to actually research a topic before you make statements like "no candidate in the history of America ever tried a stunt like that". Would you care to now?

 

[Man With A Plan]

Trump said that as soon as the election was over, he was going to sue ALL SIXTEEN WOMEN.
They never backed down on their allegations, but Trump backed down from taking them to court.
And one of those women, E. Jean Carroll was able to sue under a statute of limitations law, and we saw the result of that.

Come on, Postman...what you "saw" in the E. Jean Carroll case was what you get when you have liberal judges and liberal juries sitting on cases where they hate the defendant so much that the verdict is predetermined. The reason why the "lawfare" that the Democrats thought would bring down Trump isn't working is that Americans have watched what the left has done for the past seven plus years and to be blunt...they're sick of it!
Carroll was able to sue because Democrats literally changed the law so that she COULD sue! One more example of the two tier justice system that we now live under.

 

[Man With A Plan]

It would be no different than a "perfectly legal NDA" that the person who helped you rob the bank, can't disclose any information about you.

I don't even know what that analogy is supposed to mean, Postman. Robbing a bank is a crime. Executing an NDA is not.

 

[Man With A Plan]

What about Trumps first two years in office. Trumps IRS didn't even look at his tax returns, as was required by law to audit them.

Two years !!

What are you referring to, Postman? Would you care to share what was found when they DID audit his returns?

 

[Faun]

You might want to actually research a topic before you make statements like "no candidate in the history of America ever tried a stunt like that". Would you care to now?

It's never been done the way Trump did it.

 

[Faun]

Come on, Postman...what you "saw" in the E. Jean Carroll case was what you get when you have liberal judges and liberal juries sitting on cases where they hate the defendant so much that the verdict is predetermined. The reason why the "lawfare" that the Democrats thought would bring down Trump isn't working is that Americans have watched what the left has done for the past seven plus years and to be blunt...they're sick of it!
Carroll was able to sue because Democrats literally changed the law so that she COULD sue! One more example of the two tier justice system that we now live under.

LOL

Trump's always the victim, huh? ALWAYS.

 

[Faun]

I don't even know what that analogy is supposed to mean, Postman. Robbing a bank is a crime. Executing an NDA is not.

Making an illegal campaign contribution is also a crime.

 

[Man With A Plan]

It's never been done the way Trump did it.

Alternate electors have been used before. Didn't go research it...did you?

 

[Man With A Plan]

Making an illegal campaign contribution is also a crime.

Trump executed an NCA. That's not illegal despite Alvin Bragg's attempts to call it that.

 

[Faun]

Alternate electors have been used before. Didn't go research it...did you?

Of course I did. That's how I know this was never done before. Those were alternate electors. Trump's were fake electors. There's a difference.

 

[Faun]

Trump executed an NCA. That's not illegal despite Alvin Bragg's attempts to call it that.

No, Trump didn't execute it. Stop lying to prop up your bullshit. At Trump's behest, Cohen executed it. With his own money. That was a benefit to Trump's campaign, establishing it as a campaign contribution. And it was far in excess of the legal limit, making it an illegal campaign contribution.