Why we should listen to the 97%

[PMZ]

Fascists are extreme, extreme conservatives.

You are at least on the border of that.

The nature of conservativism is small, unobtrusive government which allows people to succeed or fail more or less on their own or with their local community. The constitution is pure classical liberalism, or modern conservativism...(one in the same) Would you care to live under a government which strictly adheres to the literal word of the constitution? I would and the government under a literal interpretation of the constitution would be small and unobtrusive.....care to show me a small unobtrusive fascist state? Fascism is the left wing of liberalism and bears no resemblance to conservativism which is, in effect, classical liberalism.

There really is no excuse for you being so ignorant in the modern world.

''Would you care to live under a government which strictly adheres to the literal word of the constitution?''

We, the people, invested decades of blood, sweat, and tears, building American democracy from the founders plutocracy. By adhering to the Constitution including the Ammendment capability built into it. Conservatives would like to return to the plutocracy that we fought to end.

There is no way that we are going to reset to that era. Our government is of all of the people, not merely white, wealthy, males.

 

[westwall]

Fascists are extreme, extreme conservatives.

You are at least on the border of that.

Only in the fevered imaginations of the Fabian Socialists who perpetrated that lie to confuse the stupid people such as yourself. Fascism and socialism are cut from the same cloth, maximum power in the hands of the government and minimum rights to the individual.

Describes you and your fellow fascists to a "T"

Anybody who can't distinguish between American democracy and totalitarian tyranny has amply earned their irrelevance.

So why the hell are you still here polluting the forum? Your rep bar is as red as Stalin's flag.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

He was advised early in his debacle that he could pay off the entire national debt. He immediately, instead, instituted the largest redistribution of wealth up ever experienced in this country, cutting tax revenues way below expenses and began his wars on Islam. He then instructed the Fed to lower interest rates even though the economy that he inherited from Clinton was doing great, in order to inflate the housing bubble. While that was going on he cheered on Wall Street's invention of mortgage backed derivatives which, in the end, burst the housing bubble. He also cheered on business as they decimated American manufacturing in exchange for obscene executive bonuses.

Then, with the country crashing down all around, he escaped to where he'd spent most of his Presidency, Crawford, Texas, where he hasn't been heard from since.

Great job, Bushie.

He then instructed the Fed to lower interest rates even though the economy that he inherited from Clinton was doing great,

Doing great, except for the recession. And the slowdown caused by 9/11.

Perhaps it would have been smarter for him to prevent 9/11.

You're right, Bush should have killed Osama back in 1998.

 

[SSDD]

''Would you care to live under a government which strictly adheres to the literal word of the constitution?''

We, the people, invested decades of blood, sweat, and tears, building American democracy from the founders plutocracy. By adhering to the Constitution including the Ammendment capability built into it. Conservatives would like to return to the plutocracy that we fought to end.

There is no way that we are going to reset to that era. Our government is of all of the people, not merely white, wealthy, males.

So you would not care to live under a strict interpretation of the constitution. No surprise there. No fascist, socialist, or communist would. No doubt, you adhere to the "ist" idea that the constitution is a "living" document meant to be re-interpreted as necessary to further a progressive agenda.

Do you think the founders of the nation would really appreciate what has become of their idea or would they perhaps instigate another revolution as the opression we live under today is far worse than that of king george in the day. They revolted over pennies in taxes and tarrifs...what would they think of the tax structure that has come out of a liberal "interpretation" of their constitution?

 

[PMZ]

Only in the fevered imaginations of the Fabian Socialists who perpetrated that lie to confuse the stupid people such as yourself. Fascism and socialism are cut from the same cloth, maximum power in the hands of the government and minimum rights to the individual.

Describes you and your fellow fascists to a "T"

Anybody who can't distinguish between American democracy and totalitarian tyranny has amply earned their irrelevance.

So why the hell are you still here polluting the forum? Your rep bar is as red as Stalin's flag.

You 've been working hard on that as you've run completely out of rational ways to sell your snake oil.

 

[PMZ]

He then instructed the Fed to lower interest rates even though the economy that he inherited from Clinton was doing great,

Doing great, except for the recession. And the slowdown caused by 9/11.

Perhaps it would have been smarter for him to prevent 9/11.

You're right, Bush should have killed Osama back in 1998.

Of course that's unrelated to the topic of the Bushman listening to his advisors and protecting the country.

I suppose that was too much to expect from an ignorant wealthy playboy. The Great Gatsby of Crawford.

 

[PMZ]

''Would you care to live under a government which strictly adheres to the literal word of the constitution?''

We, the people, invested decades of blood, sweat, and tears, building American democracy from the founders plutocracy. By adhering to the Constitution including the Ammendment capability built into it. Conservatives would like to return to the plutocracy that we fought to end.

There is no way that we are going to reset to that era. Our government is of all of the people, not merely white, wealthy, males.

So you would not care to live under a strict interpretation of the constitution. No surprise there. No fascist, socialist, or communist would. No doubt, you adhere to the "ist" idea that the constitution is a "living" document meant to be re-interpreted as necessary to further a progressive agenda.

Do you think the founders of the nation would really appreciate what has become of their idea or would they perhaps instigate another revolution as the opression we live under today is far worse than that of king george in the day. They revolted over pennies in taxes and tarrifs...what would they think of the tax structure that has come out of a liberal "interpretation" of their constitution?

I'm a fan of America and Americans, not royalty. The royalty here at the beginning really wanted to replace British royalty with their own. And they did.

It took the American people 150 years and the Civil War to turn that around to democracy and we did it never departing from the Constitution.

Now Conservatives want to turn back all of that progress.

You not liking or respecting America is your problem, not ours.

 

[westwall]

Anybody who can't distinguish between American democracy and totalitarian tyranny has amply earned their irrelevance.

So why the hell are you still here polluting the forum? Your rep bar is as red as Stalin's flag.

You 've been working hard on that as you've run completely out of rational ways to sell your snake oil.

I'm not "selling" anything. It's you and your fellow propagandists who are trying to sell the world a con job of epic, and I mean truly epic proportions.

You and yours are the only snake oil hucksters in this thread.

 

[westwall]

''Would you care to live under a government which strictly adheres to the literal word of the constitution?''

We, the people, invested decades of blood, sweat, and tears, building American democracy from the founders plutocracy. By adhering to the Constitution including the Ammendment capability built into it. Conservatives would like to return to the plutocracy that we fought to end.

There is no way that we are going to reset to that era. Our government is of all of the people, not merely white, wealthy, males.

So you would not care to live under a strict interpretation of the constitution. No surprise there. No fascist, socialist, or communist would. No doubt, you adhere to the "ist" idea that the constitution is a "living" document meant to be re-interpreted as necessary to further a progressive agenda.

Do you think the founders of the nation would really appreciate what has become of their idea or would they perhaps instigate another revolution as the opression we live under today is far worse than that of king george in the day. They revolted over pennies in taxes and tarrifs...what would they think of the tax structure that has come out of a liberal "interpretation" of their constitution?

I'm a fan of America and Americans, not royalty. The royalty here at the beginning really wanted to replace British royalty with their own. And they did.

It took the American people 150 years and the Civil War to turn that around to democracy and we did it never departing from the Constitution.

Now Conservatives want to turn back all of that progress.

You not liking or respecting America is your problem, not ours.

No, no you're not. You espouse the "virtues" of the UN and global governance, you hate America and all it stands for.

 

[mamooth]

Losing big on the shutdown issue has driven the American rightwingfruitloop cult over the edge. It's starting to sink in, that they're the minority, that status is permanent, and the hostage-taking tactics are no longer effective.

That leaves them with nothing. Hence all the impotent rage on display.

 

[flacaltenn]

Fascists are extreme, extreme conservatives.

You are at least on the border of that.

Only in the fevered imaginations of the Fabian Socialists who perpetrated that lie to confuse the stupid people such as yourself. Fascism and socialism are cut from the same cloth, maximum power in the hands of the government and minimum rights to the individual.

Describes you and your fellow fascists to a "T"

Anybody who can't distinguish between American democracy and totalitarian tyranny has amply earned their irrelevance.

Sometimes it is hard to tell the diff.. For instance, I have problems distinguishing PMZ posts from the fortune cookies that came with my lunch..

 

[westwall]

Only in the fevered imaginations of the Fabian Socialists who perpetrated that lie to confuse the stupid people such as yourself. Fascism and socialism are cut from the same cloth, maximum power in the hands of the government and minimum rights to the individual.

Describes you and your fellow fascists to a "T"

Anybody who can't distinguish between American democracy and totalitarian tyranny has amply earned their irrelevance.

Sometimes it is hard to tell the diff.. For instance, I have problems distinguishing PMZ posts from the fortune cookies that came with my lunch..

PmsMZ's posts remind of the lunatics wandering the streets muttering to themselves.

 

[mamooth]

Rage on, kooks! Rage! Why, you'll show those dirty liberals that you can't be ignored! The ones who laughed at you will pay, yes they will!

Sucks to be irrelevant, eh?

 

[SSDD]

I'm a fan of America and Americans, not royalty. The royalty here at the beginning really wanted to replace British royalty with their own. And they did.

It took the American people 150 years and the Civil War to turn that around to democracy and we did it never departing from the Constitution.

Now Conservatives want to turn back all of that progress.

You not liking or respecting America is your problem, not ours.

Spoken like a true marxist/socialist. You have all of the buzzwords down pat. To bad you are as ignorant of American history as you are of science. Ignorance seems to be your stock in trade.

Clearly you wouldn't like to live under a government that strictly adhered to the Constitution. And as for slavery, the generational dependence the welfare state has created among the black community has been more insidious than slavery ever could have been. At least slaves knew that they were slaves.

The founders of this nation would spit in your face. I suppose to a socialist/marxist such as yourself, that might be a badge of honor. Clearly you are not a fan of a truly free America as it was founded.

 

[SSDD]

Rage on, kooks! Rage! Why, you'll show those dirty liberals that you can't be ignored! The ones who laughed at you will pay, yes they will!

Sucks to be irrelevant, eh?

I am afraid that it is you who is irrelevant.....perhaps that is the source of your perpetual anger and bitterness.

You have become laughing stock.

 

[westwall]

Rage on, kooks! Rage! Why, you'll show those dirty liberals that you can't be ignored! The ones who laughed at you will pay, yes they will!

Sucks to be irrelevant, eh?

Rage on? It's you assahts who are angry. We're kicking your collective asses in the scientific arena and the government shutdown doesn't bother us one bit.

 

[bripat9643]

''Would you care to live under a government which strictly adheres to the literal word of the constitution?''

We, the people, invested decades of blood, sweat, and tears, building American democracy from the founders plutocracy. By adhering to the Constitution including the Ammendment capability built into it. Conservatives would like to return to the plutocracy that we fought to end.

There is no way that we are going to reset to that era. Our government is of all of the people, not merely white, wealthy, males.

So you would not care to live under a strict interpretation of the constitution. No surprise there. No fascist, socialist, or communist would. No doubt, you adhere to the "ist" idea that the constitution is a "living" document meant to be re-interpreted as necessary to further a progressive agenda.

Do you think the founders of the nation would really appreciate what has become of their idea or would they perhaps instigate another revolution as the opression we live under today is far worse than that of king george in the day. They revolted over pennies in taxes and tarrifs...what would they think of the tax structure that has come out of a liberal "interpretation" of their constitution?

I'm a fan of America and Americans, not royalty. The royalty here at the beginning really wanted to replace British royalty with their own. And they did.

It took the American people 150 years and the Civil War to turn that around to democracy and we did it never departing from the Constitution.

Now Conservatives want to turn back all of that progress.

You not liking or respecting America is your problem, not ours.

There was no royalty, nimrod. The Founding Fathers were the first men ever to abolish royalty and the aristocracy. They did, however, attempt to make merit a requirement of having a say in government. Too bad they failed. Now anyone who can fog a mirror has a say in running the lives of everyone else.

It's no surprise that bootlickers like you have such high regard for the Civil War. that's when the Constitution as it was intended to work was destroyed and replaced by mob rule. Aside from eliminating slavery, there was no progress.

The United States has been marching steadily to its destruction ever since.

 

[SSDD]

Rage on? It's you assahts who are angry. We're kicking your collective asses in the scientific arena and the government shutdown doesn't bother us one bit.

Personally, I don't mind the shutdown....congress can't steal my money or reduce my freedom when they are not in session.

 

[SSDD]

There was no royalty, nimrod. The Founding Fathers were the first men ever to abolish royalty and the aristocracy. They did, however, attempt to make merit a requirement of having a say in government. Too bad they failed. Now anyone who can fog a mirror has a say in running the lives of everyone else.

It's no surprise that bootlickers like you have such high regard for the Civil War. that's when the Constitution as it was intended to work was destroyed and replaced by mob rule. Aside from eliminating slavery, there was no progress.

The United States has been marching steadily to its destruction ever since.

He is as ignorant regarding history as he is regarding science. To modern socialists/marxists like himself, any system that isn't based on absolute government power and handouts to anyone who doesn't feel like working for a living is something like an aristocracy. Idiots like him never learn. To bad he didn't have the chance to live his dream in the old soviet union.

 

[bripat9643]

There was no royalty, nimrod. The Founding Fathers were the first men ever to abolish royalty and the aristocracy. They did, however, attempt to make merit a requirement of having a say in government. Too bad they failed. Now anyone who can fog a mirror has a say in running the lives of everyone else.

It's no surprise that bootlickers like you have such high regard for the Civil War. that's when the Constitution as it was intended to work was destroyed and replaced by mob rule. Aside from eliminating slavery, there was no progress.

The United States has been marching steadily to its destruction ever since.

He is as ignorant regarding history as he is regarding science. To modern socialists/marxists like himself, any system that isn't based on absolute government power and handouts to anyone who doesn't feel like working for a living is something like an aristocracy. Idiots like him never learn. To bad he didn't have the chance to live his dream in the old soviet union.

In the liberal lexicon, if you don't support looting and pillaging the rich, then you "favor" the rich.

That's really how they think.