Why Palestinians don't just leave Gaza?? Difficul to do!

[Phoenall]

You have not shown the facts, as presented as false. That's impossible, the facts are the facts as reported by the UN. Jews owned less than 15% of the land. Now, what does the fact that the Jews stole the land from the Christians and Muslims, who owned more than 85% of it, have to do with death camps and the final solution? Weren't the death camps operated by Christians and the final solution a German idea?

I So if your link shows on one page that the arab muslims only owned 0.8% of Palestine land while the Jews owned 4.8% it is not showing your interpretation to be false. Since when has possessed been the same as owned, a thief can posses your property but they can never own it can they.
Read again the MANDATE for PALESTINE and see who LEGALLY owned the land and why that was made INTERNATIONAL LAW.
No they were operated by muslims and the final solution was an Islamic idea from the time of Mohamed. Today it is still touted by hamas and fatah as one of their goals for Palestine. This is what you support in your every post the genocide of the Jews and Christians so that you can them move on to Europe with your mantra first Saturday then sunday

Whoever owns pieces of private property is irrelevant.

It must be said, however, that the statute of the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine (1922) was itself in contradiction to the provisions of Art. 22 of the League’s Covenant insofar as it incorporated – in the Preamble and in Articles 2, 4, 6 and 7 – the basic provisions of the Balfour Declaration. The Mandate for Palestine in itself violated letter and spirit of Art. 22 of the League’s Covenant, which evokes (in Par. 1), in connection with the protection of the rights of peoples under the Mandate, a “sacred trust of civilization”.

On the basis of this legal concept, national Palestinian sovereignty was not annulled when Britain was entrusted by the League of Nations with the mandate over Palestine.[6] Furthermore, the mandate over Palestine – as the mandates over Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Transjordan – fell into category (A) according to the classification of the League of Nations. This category, in distinction from the categories (B) and (C), implied the expectation of early independence.[7] Henry Cattan rightly concludes: “The legal effect under international law of the detachment of Palestine from the Ottoman Empire and of recognition of its people as an independent nation was to make of this country a separate and independent state.”[8] All the legal assumptions relating to the international status of Palestine were based on the principle according to which sovereignty over a mandated territory lies in its inhabitants.[9] This legal notion has also been confirmed in a United Nations report on the origins of the Palestine problem where it is stated that the sovereignty of Palestine (having been classified as falling under a category “A” Mandate) “could not be alienated either by the Mandatory Power or by the League.”[10]

Palestinian-Israeli Conflict​

In fact, to allow the British to establish a European colony in Palestine, they had to circumvent the requirements of the Covenant of the LoN, contrary to International law which established how the administration of Class A Mandates (provisional states) was to be handled.

The source is invalid if you bother to read the link organized by the Arab Cause Solidarity Committee


The LoN made international law and you are trying to impose 2015 laws on something that happened in 1923

What source. I am A/364, not a subcommittee report.

A/364
3 September 1947
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE SECOND SESSION OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY


SUPPLEMENT No. 11



UNITED NATIONS
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
ON PALESTINE



REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

VOLUME 1

MANIPULATING THE REPORTS AGAIN TO PREACH YOUR RACIST ANTUI ISRAELI PROPAGANDA

 

[Phoenall]

As I said only a complete retard would ask why in this context when only they can answer the why.
I will hazard a guess and say the Jewish girls laughed at you and your miniscule penis and your premature emission. or the money lender sent you away because you did not have the backing you needed to borrow the money. Maybe you know that they are so much better than you and have a better chance in life, and it gets right up your nose.

Same thing to you Jew haters, and no amount of bluffing will alter that

Judaism is not what you hate it is the Jews, or the symbolic Jew that you see as being a greedy miser.

Seems that I have hit a raw nerve and you have just realised your cover is blown, so you reply with aggressive abusive foul mouthed tirade like the typical uneducated red neck trailer park trash


The only definition you have given is one centred around JEW HATRED deal with it

STOP LYING as I very rarely mention the holocaust. Shows you are beaten by facts and reality again

Definitely lost the plot and the argument so start screaming like a spoilt brat

Only in your drug induced fantasy world

I've only had one Jewish girlfriend, who I met in algebra class.

She was an absolute psycho in bed!

Trying to get away from your immature fumblings. You do know you sound like some 23 year old virgin don't you bragging about a non existent sex life.

 

[montelatici]

I So if your link shows on one page that the arab muslims only owned 0.8% of Palestine land while the Jews owned 4.8% it is not showing your interpretation to be false. Since when has possessed been the same as owned, a thief can posses your property but they can never own it can they.
Read again the MANDATE for PALESTINE and see who LEGALLY owned the land and why that was made INTERNATIONAL LAW.
No they were operated by muslims and the final solution was an Islamic idea from the time of Mohamed. Today it is still touted by hamas and fatah as one of their goals for Palestine. This is what you support in your every post the genocide of the Jews and Christians so that you can them move on to Europe with your mantra first Saturday then sunday

Whoever owns pieces of private property is irrelevant.

It must be said, however, that the statute of the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine (1922) was itself in contradiction to the provisions of Art. 22 of the League’s Covenant insofar as it incorporated – in the Preamble and in Articles 2, 4, 6 and 7 – the basic provisions of the Balfour Declaration. The Mandate for Palestine in itself violated letter and spirit of Art. 22 of the League’s Covenant, which evokes (in Par. 1), in connection with the protection of the rights of peoples under the Mandate, a “sacred trust of civilization”.

On the basis of this legal concept, national Palestinian sovereignty was not annulled when Britain was entrusted by the League of Nations with the mandate over Palestine.[6] Furthermore, the mandate over Palestine – as the mandates over Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Transjordan – fell into category (A) according to the classification of the League of Nations. This category, in distinction from the categories (B) and (C), implied the expectation of early independence.[7] Henry Cattan rightly concludes: “The legal effect under international law of the detachment of Palestine from the Ottoman Empire and of recognition of its people as an independent nation was to make of this country a separate and independent state.”[8] All the legal assumptions relating to the international status of Palestine were based on the principle according to which sovereignty over a mandated territory lies in its inhabitants.[9] This legal notion has also been confirmed in a United Nations report on the origins of the Palestine problem where it is stated that the sovereignty of Palestine (having been classified as falling under a category “A” Mandate) “could not be alienated either by the Mandatory Power or by the League.”[10]

Palestinian-Israeli Conflict​

In fact, to allow the British to establish a European colony in Palestine, they had to circumvent the requirements of the Covenant of the LoN, contrary to International law which established how the administration of Class A Mandates (provisional states) was to be handled.

The source is invalid if you bother to read the link organized by the Arab Cause Solidarity Committee


The LoN made international law and you are trying to impose 2015 laws on something that happened in 1923

What source. I am A/364, not a subcommittee report.

A/364
3 September 1947
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE SECOND SESSION OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY


SUPPLEMENT No. 11



UNITED NATIONS
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
ON PALESTINE



REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

VOLUME 1

MANIPULATING THE REPORTS AGAIN TO PREACH YOUR RACIST ANTUI ISRAELI PROPAGANDA

You are such a silly person. How can the title of a document be "manipulated".

 

[Phoenall]

Whoever owns pieces of private property is irrelevant.

It must be said, however, that the statute of the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine (1922) was itself in contradiction to the provisions of Art. 22 of the League’s Covenant insofar as it incorporated – in the Preamble and in Articles 2, 4, 6 and 7 – the basic provisions of the Balfour Declaration. The Mandate for Palestine in itself violated letter and spirit of Art. 22 of the League’s Covenant, which evokes (in Par. 1), in connection with the protection of the rights of peoples under the Mandate, a “sacred trust of civilization”.

On the basis of this legal concept, national Palestinian sovereignty was not annulled when Britain was entrusted by the League of Nations with the mandate over Palestine.[6] Furthermore, the mandate over Palestine – as the mandates over Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Transjordan – fell into category (A) according to the classification of the League of Nations. This category, in distinction from the categories (B) and (C), implied the expectation of early independence.[7] Henry Cattan rightly concludes: “The legal effect under international law of the detachment of Palestine from the Ottoman Empire and of recognition of its people as an independent nation was to make of this country a separate and independent state.”[8] All the legal assumptions relating to the international status of Palestine were based on the principle according to which sovereignty over a mandated territory lies in its inhabitants.[9] This legal notion has also been confirmed in a United Nations report on the origins of the Palestine problem where it is stated that the sovereignty of Palestine (having been classified as falling under a category “A” Mandate) “could not be alienated either by the Mandatory Power or by the League.”[10]

Palestinian-Israeli Conflict​

In fact, to allow the British to establish a European colony in Palestine, they had to circumvent the requirements of the Covenant of the LoN, contrary to International law which established how the administration of Class A Mandates (provisional states) was to be handled.

The source is invalid if you bother to read the link organized by the Arab Cause Solidarity Committee


The LoN made international law and you are trying to impose 2015 laws on something that happened in 1923

What source. I am A/364, not a subcommittee report.

A/364
3 September 1947
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE SECOND SESSION OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY


SUPPLEMENT No. 11



UNITED NATIONS
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
ON PALESTINE



REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

VOLUME 1

MANIPULATING THE REPORTS AGAIN TO PREACH YOUR RACIST ANTUI ISRAELI PROPAGANDA

You are such a silly person. How can the title of a document be "manipulated".

By truncating it and leaving parts out. better to just post the link and take the flak for linking to islamomoron propaganda.

 

[Billo_Really]

Trying to get away from your immature fumblings.

No, just responding you to bringing up me and Jewish women.

You do know you sound like some 23 year old virgin don't you bragging about a non existent sex life.

I wasn't a virgin when I was 23.

Get back on topic, asshole!

 

[Phoenall]

Trying to get away from your immature fumblings.

No, just responding you to bringing up me and Jewish women.

You do know you sound like some 23 year old virgin don't you bragging about a non existent sex life.

I wasn't a virgin when I was 23.

Get back on topic, asshole!

See just another 23 year old virgin bragging about his conquests with his right hand.

 

[Billo_Really]

See just another 23 year old virgin bragging about his conquests with his right hand.

Don't tell me you've never used your left hand and acted like you were on a first date?

Now back to the thread topic...

...it's a little hard to leave when you have over 500 roadblocks and checkpoints restricting your movements on YOUR OWN FUCKING PROPERTY!

 

[Phoenall]

See just another 23 year old virgin bragging about his conquests with his right hand.

Don't tell me you've never used your left hand and acted like you were on a first date?

Now back to the thread topic...

...it's a little hard to leave when you have over 500 roadblocks and checkpoints restricting your movements on YOUR OWN FUCKING PROPERTY!

That was as a result of terrorist attacks on Jewish children, so is allowed under the Geneva conventions.

And your source is telling RACIST LIES as the Palestinians deliberately register their vehicles to get the different coloured number plate. The green number plates are issued by the Palestinians not by the Israelis.
The orange roads are in Israel so the Palestinians have no right to enter Israel.

You should really check on your links first dildo because you show yourself to be a Jew Hater when you use the anti semitic sites for your information.

 

[montelatici]

In fact, to allow the British to establish a European colony in Palestine, they had to circumvent the requirements of the Covenant of the LoN, contrary to International law which established how the administration of Class A Mandates (provisional states) was to be handled.

The source is invalid if you bother to read the link organized by the Arab Cause Solidarity Committee


The LoN made international law and you are trying to impose 2015 laws on something that happened in 1923

What source. I am A/364, not a subcommittee report.

A/364
3 September 1947
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE SECOND SESSION OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY


SUPPLEMENT No. 11



UNITED NATIONS
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
ON PALESTINE



REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

VOLUME 1

MANIPULATING THE REPORTS AGAIN TO PREACH YOUR RACIST ANTUI ISRAELI PROPAGANDA

You are such a silly person. How can the title of a document be "manipulated".

By truncating it and leaving parts out. better to just post the link and take the flak for linking to islamomoron propaganda.

I left nothing out. You are making things up, as usual.

 

[P F Tinmore]

See just another 23 year old virgin bragging about his conquests with his right hand.

Don't tell me you've never used your left hand and acted like you were on a first date?

Now back to the thread topic...

...it's a little hard to leave when you have over 500 roadblocks and checkpoints restricting your movements on YOUR OWN FUCKING PROPERTY!

 

[Phoenall]

See just another 23 year old virgin bragging about his conquests with his right hand.

Don't tell me you've never used your left hand and acted like you were on a first date?

Now back to the thread topic...

...it's a little hard to leave when you have over 500 roadblocks and checkpoints restricting your movements on YOUR OWN FUCKING PROPERTY!

If they didn't practice terrorism then they would not be subject to military law, or is that concept too hard for you to understand. If you were throwing water bombs at children the courts would put an injunction in place. Well that is what Israel has done in the west bank.

 

[Billo_Really]

That was as a result of terrorist attacks on Jewish children, so is allowed under the Geneva conventions.

You're such a fuckin' liar!

Quote the specific GC to back up your claim.

And your source is telling RACIST LIES as the Palestinians deliberately register their vehicles to get the different coloured number plate. The green number plates are issued by the Palestinians not by the Israelis.
The orange roads are in Israel so the Palestinians have no right to enter Israel.

There are orange roads in the West Bank, you dumbass!

You should really check on your links first dildo because you show yourself to be a Jew Hater when you use the anti semitic sites for your information.

You keep pushing that lie, because you're an immature little 15 year old.

Now fuck off, it's past your bedtime.

 

[Billo_Really]

If they didn't practice terrorism then they would not be subject to military law, or is that concept too hard for you to understand. If you were throwing water bombs at children the courts would put an injunction in place. Well that is what Israel has done in the west bank.

You're so full of shit!

Take your life, you fuckin' loser.

 

[Phoenall]

That was as a result of terrorist attacks on Jewish children, so is allowed under the Geneva conventions.

You're such a fuckin' liar!

Quote the specific GC to back up your claim.

And your source is telling RACIST LIES as the Palestinians deliberately register their vehicles to get the different coloured number plate. The green number plates are issued by the Palestinians not by the Israelis.
The orange roads are in Israel so the Palestinians have no right to enter Israel.

There are orange roads in the West Bank, you dumbass!

You should really check on your links first dildo because you show yourself to be a Jew Hater when you use the anti semitic sites for your information.

You keep pushing that lie, because you're an immature little 15 year old.

Now fuck off, it's past your bedtime.

Why cant you read it yourself, you got the link to the source and now you want more

Not quite they are in the parts of the west bank that the Palestinians handed over to the Jews

 

[Phoenall]

If they didn't practice terrorism then they would not be subject to military law, or is that concept too hard for you to understand. If you were throwing water bombs at children the courts would put an injunction in place. Well that is what Israel has done in the west bank.

You're so full of shit!

Take your life, you fuckin' loser.

You have just proven that you are a Jew Hater by your outburst, really I should complain and have you removed from the board for trolling

 

[Billo_Really]

You have just proven that you are a Jew Hater by your outburst, really I should complain and have you removed from the board for trolling

Another tactic by the pro-Israeli crowd, is to try and silence their critics. Somewhat like what a bunch of Israeli doctors are doing with a letter to get the editor of the Lancet fired, because of an editorial...

Israel’s War against The Lancet: When Medicine and Politics Mix

...criticizing Israel's disproportionate use of force in the Gaza campaign last summer.

You don't have the stones (or moral integrity) to take responsibility for your actions, so you try to silence anyone who speaks out about those actions.

Fuck you, retard, you're a scumbag to the core!

 

[Billo_Really]

Why cant you read it yourself, you got the link to the source and now you want more

You made the claim, you back it up, punk!

BTW, we both know you can't.

Not quite they are in the parts of the west bank that the Palestinians handed over to the Jews

You're a perfect example of why the Israeli's are the bad guys.

 

[Phoenall]

You have just proven that you are a Jew Hater by your outburst, really I should complain and have you removed from the board for trolling

Another tactic by the pro-Israeli crowd, is to try and silence their critics. Somewhat like what a bunch of Israeli doctors are doing with a letter to get the editor of the Lancet fired, because of an editorial...

Israel’s War against The Lancet: When Medicine and Politics Mix

...criticizing Israel's disproportionate use of force in the Gaza campaign last summer.

You don't have the stones (or moral integrity) to take responsibility for your actions, so you try to silence anyone who speaks out about those actions.

Fuck you, retard, you're a scumbag to the core!

Very mixed up aren't you dildo as I am not living in Israel, nor am I a Jew.

But do explain why a medical journal is involving itself in politics and allowing LIES to be published.

From your link we see this


"The report did chide the authors for not being more open about affiliations with organisations that might have had a stake in the “situation in Gaza”, something The Lancet editors were recommended to rectify in due course.

Some language was also taken to task – that a mere 5 percent of Israeli academics who had pleaded with the government to halt aggression in Gaza implied that “the rest” were “complicit in the massacre and destruction of Gaza” was deemed extreme."

Seems it was done for purely anti Israeli reasons and not for medical ones ...............

 

[Phoenall]

Why cant you read it yourself, you got the link to the source and now you want more

You made the claim, you back it up, punk!

BTW, we both know you can't.

Not quite they are in the parts of the west bank that the Palestinians handed over to the Jews

You're a perfect example of why the Israeli's are the bad guys.

I did I provided a link...........................Is that like your claim that the Israelis are using poison gas to kill thousands of arab muslims ?


Keep telling you I am not an Israeli..................seems that you don't understand English

 

[Billo_Really]

I did I provided a link...........................

You didn't provide shit!

Is that like your claim that the Israelis are using poison gas to kill thousands of arab muslims ?

No, that's your claim.

Keep telling you I am not an Israeli..................seems that you don't understand English

You're an Israeli bitch! Same thing.