Why Left Wingers HATE the Electoral College !!!

[JakeStarkey]

We are no more marxists than Uncensored is a responsible, solid thinking conservative.

He is merely a wack who spews.

 

[The T]

You want the GOP to become a liberal party.

No, I want it to become a conservative party:

con·serv·a·tive
   [kuhn-sur-vuh-tiv]
adjective
1.
disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.
2.
cautiously moderate or purposefully low: a conservative estimate.
3.
traditional in style or manner; avoiding novelty or showiness: conservative suit.

Then why do you insist they hold liberal views?

More like Statist/Marxist views

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, I want it to become a conservative party:

con·serv·a·tive
   [kuhn-sur-vuh-tiv]
adjective
1.
disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.
2.
cautiously moderate or purposefully low: a conservative estimate.
3.
traditional in style or manner; avoiding novelty or showiness: conservative suit.

Then why do you insist they hold liberal views?

More like Statist/Marxist views

If that is so, then da T and da daveman are fascist nazis. You guys are weird.

 

[daveman]

Then why do you insist they hold liberal views?

More like Statist/Marxist views

If that is so, then da T and da daveman are fascist nazis. You guys are weird.

Considering you're an Obamabot who thinks he's a mainstream Republican, I'd say your perceptions are worth the contents of the average public toilet.

But it's not at all surprising that you're coming to your fellow leftist's defense.

 

[JakeStarkey]

daveman continues to lie and think he is any impact on thinking folks on the board.

 

[thereisnospoon]

daveman continues to lie and think he is any impact on thinking folks on the board.

You lefties throw the word "lie" around like it was a free throw.
It is your absence of substantive rebuttal that causes you to accuse others of not being truthful. It's all you have.
You keep it up. Guess what? We don't care. Call us names. Accuse of whatever you wish.
It doesn't matter.
We don't care. Guns without bullets can only be thrown.

 

[JakeStarkey]

daveman lies like he is a rug.

He throws terms like socialist, marxist, liberals, dems, etc, like dirt clods.

He has never offer a substantive assertion or offered substantive rebuttal.

Guess what. We Americans who want America to succeed don't care what you say or think.

Call us name all you want. We don't care.

daveman is melting down.

 

[daveman]

daveman lies like he is a rug.

He throws terms like socialist, marxist, liberals, dems, etc, like dirt clods.

He has never offer a substantive assertion or offered substantive rebuttal.

Once again, Jake lies.

I notice you NEVER responded to this post, in this very thread:

If ever daveman ever makes an assertion with evidence then I can argue with him.

But, although the affirmative is his duty, he never has done so.

Thus, daveman continues as the little Teapot who loves to Spout and Pout.

Gasp. Fakey's lying. Again.

Here are some assertions with evidence:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...hate-the-electoral-college-7.html#post4800148

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...en-obama-mentioned-goin-to-2.html#post4796756

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...when-obama-mentioned-goin-to.html#post4796642

http://www.usmessageboard.com/milit...rt-martial-in-wikileaks-case.html#post4786257

Tell some more lies, Fakey. It's all you can do.

So then you repeat your lies.

Do you really think if you ignore posts, that means they don't exist? Leftists do that a lot. You really do believe that your opinions define reality.

Guess what. We Americans who want America to succeed don't care what you say or think.

Call us name all you want. We don't care.

daveman is melting down.

I do tend to get a little annoyed when people repeat disproven lies about me.

But then, I should expect it from you. You're a liar.

 

[JakeStarkey]

daveman thinks posting silly non-substantial clips is somehow substantive argumentation.

It's not. That is another example of your lying.

Keep braying your nonsense.

Call us name all you want. We don't care.

daveman is melting down

ps: what is particularly dispicable about daveman is that he would rather have America fail if his ilk don't come to power. He need not worry: Neither will happen.

 

[daveman]

daveman thinks posting silly non-substantial clips is somehow substantive argumentation.

It's not. That is another example of your lying.

Keep braying your nonsense.

Call us name all you want. We don't care.

daveman is melting down

ps: what is particularly dispicable about daveman is that he would rather have America fail if his ilk don't come to power. He need not worry: Neither will happen.

More lies from the fake Republican. Gasp.

 

[JakeStarkey]

More lying name calling from daveman. He is melting down.

 

[JoeB131]

NOt really.

If that were the case, if being "Not the Current guy" was enough to get you over the finish line, then we'd be at the end of President Kerry's second term right now. Hate doesn't win elections.

It did in 2008.

And really, hate is all you leftists have.

Um. No. Actually. Obama won because McCain wasn't even liked by Most Republicans. Again, the only ones voting based on hate were the GOP last time. They were voting against, the Democrats were voting for. How often do you see anyone on this board who says he's a conservative have a kind word for John McCain? But he was acceptable to the establishment, and Huckabee wasn't. They couldn't sell Romney then, they can't sell him now.

I think I could support Santorum,

You're a communist, Santorum opposes everything you stand for.

Uh, no, guy. I'm someone who realizes that Capitalism ONLY survives if everyone benefits, which is not what's happening now. The only thing tha protects us from a European Style Socialism is a middle class earning a good paycheck and not wanting to pay it to folks who sit home and watch Jerry Springer all day. The problem with the GOP is that it's good with clowns like Romney eliminating those good paying jobs and pushing more of them on that couch.

Romney is to the left of Santorum, you are irrational.

As I've said before, in a world where Ann Coulter praises Romney's Health Care Takeover, we can really stop having discussions about left or right. They've become meaningless. Santorum is for working folks, Romney is for the Rich. That's the real divide here, not one of "left" and "right". We almost had this discussion in 2008, when it was Huckabee vs. Romney, and Huckabee won that discussion then. Then the GOP Establishment punted and nominated McCain.

Look, you're a lefty troll thinking that Republicans are so stupid that if a couple of leftwingers like you and fakey jake spew Marxism, the conservatives will think "golly gee, that thar uthor Reeepubleecan dun thanx that gubmint cuntrol orver everything is gud policee, sew Iz jesa gunna promotes its too..."

Once again, the GOP really no longer can claim the "small government mantra" when they supported TARP. We all became socialists when the Government had to save the banks.

Now, Obama's got the easy job. All he has to do is get 94% of the people who voted for him last time to do so again.

That's not so easy, those who were fooled in 2008 won't be eager to be fooled again.

Really? I haven't seen anyone on this board who has said, "I voted for Obama in 2008, and what a mistake that was. I'm voting for whoever the GOP puts up!" Haven't met that person in real life, either. Human nature is not admit you made a mistake. On the other hand, I voted for McCain, I won't vote for Romney because I hate Mormons. (and a lot of other reasons.) I won't vote for Paul because he's crazy. I could vote for Santorum or Gingrich, but I know a lot of McCain supporters who won't go for them because they are too far to the right.

Santorum's religious nature puts me off a bit. But again, he gets that we need a middle class to survive as a society.

Yep, you're convinced that Obama's Reich will last a thousand years...

NO, I expect it to last 8 years. Because the GOP has not put up good candidates.

There were a lot of guys who would be taking the fight to Obama right now. Mitch Daniels, Jeb Bush. They picked not to run. They did the political calculus, figured that it would be too much trouble to wrest the nomination from Romney, and then get pilloried in the press for oppossing the first black president.

They figured that in 2016, the Dems have an empty bench (especially after a bunch of Democrats get cleaned out in the 2014 midterms.)

SOmething I thought I would never hear. "Boy, I wish Jeb Bush would run." A couple more years, I might be saying it.

 

[Contumacious]

Because the GOP has not put up good candidates.
.

Bullshit.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

Ron Paul is clearly the best candidate.

.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Because the GOP has not put up good candidates.
.

Bullshit.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

Ron Paul is clearly the best candidate.

.

Says one of the most unsavory characters on the Board.

This is rich!

 

[Dragon]

Then why do you insist they hold liberal views?

I don't. I suggest (not insist) that they should hold conservative views as opposed to insane ones. There is such a thing as conservatism that doesn't try to deny reality. You wouldn't think so these days, but I'm old enough to remember it.

I wouldn't vote Republican even so, because that's not my role in the dialog, but I recognize its importance, and the fact that we don't have a reality-based conservative party is a serious problem for us as a nation.