Why it's important not to pay a living wage:

1) human nature is such that $15/hr at McDonalds will mean that many McDonald's workers will not aspire to more and will have instead learned that you get ahead with the help of govt coercion.


2) a business always faces a choice between labor and capital: do I dig a ditch using 15 guys with shovels or one guy with a huge earth mover, or, do I hire a person to say, "Welcome to McDonalds, may I take your order" or do I use a touch screen. $15/hour pushes McDonalds toward the touch screen and customers toward eating at home. No net benefit is possible.

This is called the law of supply and demand. When price goes up people buy less not more. This is why Rolls Royce sells fewer cars than Ford.

Simple enough for a child to grasp but not an adult liberal.

Is that why there are so few poor people in India?
 
Welfare should reward work -- the more hours you work, the more Welfare you get if you are in a qualifying "low income" line of work.
.

the problem is you don't work as hard and try to improve yourself when you get your wage subsidized by liberal govt
 
Here's a question: if a worker is not earning a "living wage" then how is he supposed to live? Just a simple question.

live at home, with room mates, with wife, etc etc. work 2 jobs etc etc
Most min wage workers are living in homes with other wage earners. This isnt rocket science. But somehow the Left thinks everyone is "entitled" to $30/hr for doing basically nothing.
 
1) human nature is such that $15/hr at McDonalds will mean that many McDonald's workers will not aspire to more and will have instead learned that you get ahead with the help of govt coercion.


2) a business always faces a choice between labor and capital: do I dig a ditch using 15 guys with shovels or one guy with a huge earth mover, or, do I hire a person to say, "Welcome to McDonalds, may I take your order" or do I use a touch screen. $15/hour pushes McDonalds toward the touch screen and customers toward eating at home. No net benefit is possible.

This is called the law of supply and demand. When price goes up people buy less not more. This is why Rolls Royce sells fewer cars than Ford.

Simple enough for a child to grasp but not an adult liberal.

Is that why there are so few poor people in India?
too stupid and illiterate as always!! India is socialist
 
Here's a question: if a worker is not earning a "living wage" then how is he supposed to live? Just a simple question.

live at home, with room mates, with wife, etc etc. work 2 jobs etc etc
Most min wage workers are living in homes with other wage earners. This isnt rocket science. But somehow the Left thinks everyone is "entitled" to $30/hr for doing basically nothing.

Yes. They are spouses working the second household job trying to pay the bills. They are teenagers living at home trying to save up for college.

No reason we should respect those people, I guess.
 
1) human nature is such that $15/hr at McDonalds will mean that many McDonald's workers will not aspire to more and will have instead learned that you get ahead with the help of govt coercion.


2) a business always faces a choice between labor and capital: do I dig a ditch using 15 guys with shovels or one guy with a huge earth mover, or, do I hire a person to say, "Welcome to McDonalds, may I take your order" or do I use a touch screen. $15/hour pushes McDonalds toward the touch screen and customers toward eating at home. No net benefit is possible.

This is called the law of supply and demand. When price goes up people buy less not more. This is why Rolls Royce sells fewer cars than Ford.

Simple enough for a child to grasp but not an adult liberal.

Is that why there are so few poor people in India?
too stupid and illiterate as always!! India is socialist

You're an idiot. Is the minimum wage $15 in India?
 
There is not enough demand for skilled workers to sustain the full population.

dear, supply equals demand. This is econ 101 class one day one. Do you have the education to be here??

What? That sounds pretty stupid. During a famine, does supply equal demand? I'm talking actual on the ground demand not some theoretical "realized demand" sort of thing to fit crude Econ 101 models.
 
There is not enough demand for skilled workers to sustain the full population.

dear, supply equals demand. This is econ 101 class one day one. Do you have the education to be here??

What? That sounds pretty stupid. During a famine, does supply equal demand? I'm talking actual on the ground demand not some theoretical "realized demand" sort of thing to fit crude Econ 101 models.
We aren't having a famine. Famines typically come about because of communist practices.
 
1) human nature is such that $15/hr at McDonalds will mean that many McDonald's workers will not aspire to more and will have instead learned that you get ahead with the help of govt coercion.


2) a business always faces a choice between labor and capital: do I dig a ditch using 15 guys with shovels or one guy with a huge earth mover, or, do I hire a person to say, "Welcome to McDonalds, may I take your order" or do I use a touch screen. $15/hour pushes McDonalds toward the touch screen and customers toward eating at home. No net benefit is possible.

This is called the law of supply and demand. When price goes up people buy less not more. This is why Rolls Royce sells fewer cars than Ford.

Simple enough for a child to grasp but not an adult liberal.

They're putting self serve checkouts in retail stores NOW. The minimum wage is not 15 bucks.
 

Forum List

Back
Top