Why is Obama Really Bringing Muslims Here?

[Clementine]

Obama contradicts himself when you think about it. On one hand, he says ISIS is JV and that they are contained. Then he rushes to bring refugees over as quickly as possible even though the State Dept, on it's own website, says that it takes 18 - 24 months to properly vet refugees. Obama is talking of a plan to bring them here to escape ISIS over the next few years. That certainly indicates that he knows his plan won't work any time in the near future even as he claims it is working. Seems the best course would be to aggressively eliminate ISIS so the people can stay in their homeland. In the mean while, it would help more people at less cost to relocate them closer to their homeland. Obama seems more intent on leaving ISIS alone and relocating Muslims to the U.S. That is beginning to look like the main goal. Most of the Muslims believe in sharia law, which does not bode well for the communites they will be placed in and ultimately will be bad for the country as the population of those against our rights and constitution increases.

"So maybe where he ought to start is a foreign policy in the Middle East and Syria where people can go back to their homelands, which is their preference," Gowdy continued. "Maybe you ought to defeat that JV team you thought you had contained. That would be the very best thing you could do to help people aspire to a better life."

https://www.foramerica.org/2015/11/this-congressman-has-the-perfect-answer-to-the-syrian-refugee-crisis/



Obama didn't seem concerned when it was just Christians being persecuted. Once it was Muslims saying they need help, he couldn't move fast enough. Several Christian families who came to the U.S. were denied help and deported, yet Obama doesn't want us to even question the Muslims.

Here is an interview with a real refugee. Lots of scum are jumping on the bandwagon for a free ride to the U.S. We don't have the money, yet Obama is choosing a plan that is less cost effective and opens us up to threats from ISIS members joining the refugees.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXSnm4H5DiU

 

[leftwinger]

Americans vote for a guy with Three Muslim Names then wonder why the lady at Kroger won't check out their Bacon..........Barry from Honolulu aka Barack Hussien Obama.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Every President for the last several decades has brought in Muslims you spineless rubes

 

[bendog]

Literally? Because Obama's failed to man up to the necessisty of no fly and safe zones in Iraq and Syria, and do whatever we have to do to put in place a force (hopefully muslim/kurd and special forces) to remove ISIS and at least take over the 80% or so of Syria Assad doesn't control, and the result is a human calamity like we've not seen since the end of WWII. So now the civilized nations are scrambling around trying to band aid the damn thing.

 

[bendog]

Every President for the last several decades has brought in Muslims you spineless rubes

Well, that's true, but the global size seems larger than before. There are around 85K Somali-americans.

 

[Clementine]

Every President for the last several decades has brought in Muslims you spineless rubes

What other president specifically favored Muslims while ignoring the plight of Christians? Christians remain the most persecuted of all in all those Muslim countries, yet make up such a tiny percent of the refugees. And it would be better to relocate most of the Muslims over there instead of bringing them here. More would be helped that way, but Obama is determined to bring as many Muslims as he can here and spread them across the states. That sounds like a plan ISIS would come up with, not a U.S. president.

 

[bendog]

I don't see that we're ignoring Christians so much as ..... the vast maj of refugees aren't Christian. So, it would seem you're suggesting we favor Christians over non-Christians.

And, if memory serves, we did the same with SE Asia.

 

[Siete]

Why is Obama Really Bringing Muslims Here

to give all the RW's a stroke so they'll stfu... why else?

 

[Seawytch]

Obama isn't "bringing" anyone here. The US is accepting refugees fleeing torture and persecution...like we've always done.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Every President for the last several decades has brought in Muslims you spineless rubes

What other president specifically favored Muslims while ignoring the plight of Christians? Christians remain the most persecuted of all in all those Muslim countries, yet make up such a tiny percent of the refugees. And it would be better to relocate most of the Muslims over there instead of bringing them here. More would be helped that way, but Obama is determined to bring as many Muslims as he can here and spread them across the states. That sounds like a plan ISIS would come up with, not a U.S. president.

Well your problem there is that nobody is ignoring Christians or favoring Muslims. I know you want to prioritize Christians and leave those filthy Muzzies to die but it's not going to happen.

 

[Rustic]

Obama contradicts himself when you think about it. On one hand, he says ISIS is JV and that they are contained. Then he rushes to bring refugees over as quickly as possible even though the State Dept, on it's own website, says that it takes 18 - 24 months to properly vet refugees. Obama is talking of a plan to bring them here to escape ISIS over the next few years. That certainly indicates that he knows his plan won't work any time in the near future even as he claims it is working. Seems the best course would be to aggressively eliminate ISIS so the people can stay in their homeland. In the mean while, it would help more people at less cost to relocate them closer to their homeland. Obama seems more intent on leaving ISIS alone and relocating Muslims to the U.S. That is beginning to look like the main goal. Most of the Muslims believe in sharia law, which does not bode well for the communites they will be placed in and ultimately will be bad for the country as the population of those against our rights and constitution increases.

"So maybe where he ought to start is a foreign policy in the Middle East and Syria where people can go back to their homelands, which is their preference," Gowdy continued. "Maybe you ought to defeat that JV team you thought you had contained. That would be the very best thing you could do to help people aspire to a better life."

https://www.foramerica.org/2015/11/this-congressman-has-the-perfect-answer-to-the-syrian-refugee-crisis/



Obama didn't seem concerned when it was just Christians being persecuted. Once it was Muslims saying they need help, he couldn't move fast enough. Several Christian families who came to the U.S. were denied help and deported, yet Obama doesn't want us to even question the Muslims.

Here is an interview with a real refugee. Lots of scum are jumping on the bandwagon for a free ride to the U.S. We don't have the money, yet Obama is choosing a plan that is less cost effective and opens us up to threats from ISIS members joining the refugees.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXSnm4H5DiU

He does not like swine...

 

[ABikerSailor]

Literally? Because Obama's failed to man up to the necessisty of no fly and safe zones in Iraq and Syria, and do whatever we have to do to put in place a force (hopefully muslim/kurd and special forces) to remove ISIS and at least take over the 80% or so of Syria Assad doesn't control, and the result is a human calamity like we've not seen since the end of WWII. So now the civilized nations are scrambling around trying to band aid the damn thing.

What good would a no fly zone do? Daesh (ISIL) doesn't have any pilots or planes, and Syria is working alongside the US, Russia and France to bomb Daesh.

As far as creating safe zones? You DO realize that in order to do that it would require troops on the ground, right? And, since most Americans don't want any more boots on the ground in Syria than we absolutely have to, it would fall to Egypt, Syria and Russia to create those zones. When are they going to do it?

Where did you pull those solutions from? Your posterior?

 

[Katzndogz]

obama is counting on the muslims to do here what they are doing in the middle east. He's counting on them killing off the Christians.

 

[Rustic]

Let France, Syria, Iran and Russia form in a circular firing squad...

 

[Katzndogz]

Literally? Because Obama's failed to man up to the necessisty of no fly and safe zones in Iraq and Syria, and do whatever we have to do to put in place a force (hopefully muslim/kurd and special forces) to remove ISIS and at least take over the 80% or so of Syria Assad doesn't control, and the result is a human calamity like we've not seen since the end of WWII. So now the civilized nations are scrambling around trying to band aid the damn thing.

What good would a no fly zone do? Daesh (ISIL) doesn't have any pilots or planes, and Syria is working alongside the US, Russia and France to bomb Daesh.

As far as creating safe zones? You DO realize that in order to do that it would require troops on the ground, right? And, since most Americans don't want any more boots on the ground in Syria than we absolutely have to, it would fall to Egypt, Syria and Russia to create those zones. When are they going to do it?

Where did you pull those solutions from? Your posterior?

Boots on the ground.

90% of the refugees are fighting age men. Draft them, train them and send them back to fight for their homeland. Those are the boots to be on the ground.

 

[g5000]

Seems the best course would be to aggressively eliminate ISIS so the people can stay in their homeland.

That's funny. I've been asking you tards for your ISIS plan for over year and you ran away every time.

So did the GOP. They have refused to pass an AUMF against ISIS for over a year.

Cowards. The whole lot of you. And now you continue in your yellow-belliedness by shitting your pants over women and children who would be slaughtered if we turned them away.

THAT is why Obama is trying to bring them here, dumbass. I guess it takes Captain Obvious to explain to you the reason is TO SAVE THEIR LIVES. The same reason we bring any refugees here.

"Why is Obama bringing Muslims here." I see what you did there, bigot.

The are REFUGEES.

WAR refugees.

 

[Rustic]

Seems the best course would be to aggressively eliminate ISIS so the people can stay in their homeland.

That's funny. I've been asking you tards for your ISIS plan for over year and you ran away every time.

So did the GOP. They have refused to pass an AUMF against ISIS for over a year.

Cowards. The whole lot of you. And now you continue in your yellow-belliedness by shitting your pants over women and children who would be slaughtered if we turned them away.

THAT is why Obama is trying to bring them here, dumbass. I guess it takes Captain Obvious to explain to you the reason is TO SAVE THEIR LIVES. The same reason we bring any refugees here.

"Why is Obama bringing Muslims here." I see what you did there, bigot.

The are REFUGEES.

WAR refugees.

Let France, Syria, Iran and Russia form in a circular firing squad...

 

[Theowl32]

Very related to why he is kicking Iraqi Christians out.

While DC debates religion, refugees, Iraqi Christians feel Uncle Sam's boot

The skinny smoking Shiite American hating, Jewish hating pile of half black shit is nothing but a disaster. An absolute disaster.

A lying fucking disaster.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Literally? Because Obama's failed to man up to the necessisty of no fly and safe zones in Iraq and Syria, and do whatever we have to do to put in place a force (hopefully muslim/kurd and special forces) to remove ISIS and at least take over the 80% or so of Syria Assad doesn't control, and the result is a human calamity like we've not seen since the end of WWII. So now the civilized nations are scrambling around trying to band aid the damn thing.

What good would a no fly zone do? Daesh (ISIL) doesn't have any pilots or planes, and Syria is working alongside the US, Russia and France to bomb Daesh.

As far as creating safe zones? You DO realize that in order to do that it would require troops on the ground, right? And, since most Americans don't want any more boots on the ground in Syria than we absolutely have to, it would fall to Egypt, Syria and Russia to create those zones. When are they going to do it?

Where did you pull those solutions from? Your posterior?

Boots on the ground.

90% of the refugees are fighting age men. Draft them, train them and send them back to fight for their homeland. Those are the boots to be on the ground.

It's already been shown that the 90 percent figure is bogus, the figure is much lower than that.

However, I won't disagree. If a family comes and applies for refugee status, all the men of military age and able to serve should be told that getting trained and serving to fight against Daesh is a main component of their family being allowed refugee status.

If they want their country back, they've gotta put some skin in the game.

That being said, if they are willing to fight, their families should be allowed in.

 

[Theowl32]

Literally? Because Obama's failed to man up to the necessisty of no fly and safe zones in Iraq and Syria, and do whatever we have to do to put in place a force (hopefully muslim/kurd and special forces) to remove ISIS and at least take over the 80% or so of Syria Assad doesn't control, and the result is a human calamity like we've not seen since the end of WWII. So now the civilized nations are scrambling around trying to band aid the damn thing.

What good would a no fly zone do? Daesh (ISIL) doesn't have any pilots or planes, and Syria is working alongside the US, Russia and France to bomb Daesh.

As far as creating safe zones? You DO realize that in order to do that it would require troops on the ground, right? And, since most Americans don't want any more boots on the ground in Syria than we absolutely have to, it would fall to Egypt, Syria and Russia to create those zones. When are they going to do it?

Where did you pull those solutions from? Your posterior?

Boots on the ground.

90% of the refugees are fighting age men. Draft them, train them and send them back to fight for their homeland. Those are the boots to be on the ground.

It's already been shown that the 90 percent figure is bogus, the figure is much lower than that.

However, I won't disagree. If a family comes and applies for refugee status, all the men of military age and able to serve should be told that getting trained and serving to fight against Daesh is a main component of their family being allowed refugee status.

If they want their country back, they've gotta put some skin in the game.

That being said, if they are willing to fight, their families should be allowed in.

You stupid fuck face. 19 men with out a gun did what they did and 7 scumbags did what they did.

What is 1% of 10,000 asshole?

You are one of those that buy into them only allowing 10,000 in? Wait, what am I talking about? You are one of those that think the muslim skinny smoker who grew up hating this country, Israel and whites has never lied.

So, what it is 1% 10,000? You think 1% of 10,000 can cause massive damage? You fucking morons. You are nothing but a pawn. You fucking idiots.

You realize they are planning on a terror attack on this country right? What, do not believe them when they say they are?

Do you actually think they are not planning something or trying to destroy this country?

I fucking hate liberals.