Why Is Liberal Ideology Increasingly Being Rejected By The West?

First off, it's not "liberal", it's leftist.

And it's because they're retards.
We may know that; but until actual Liberals take back their namesake, and openly, loudly differentiate themselves; the world will continue to conflate the two. Classical Liberals are nearly extinct.

There's..some here. Largely they are not the most vocal.

Coyote would be the name most recognized. OL, you know who you are, RC, you also know. I don't mind liberals at all. Leftist asshats, now that's a different story.

:eek: I don't know of any male liberals here. Unless maybe Pogo. He just likes to argue for the sake of the argument.
Shoot me now, pls.

All the real liberals I know of that are here, are female. Am not aware of any decent male liberals here. That's kinda...interesting.

I know a male liberal, I'm related to him. Smart guy, we're not going to agree on everything, though. :04:
 
Last edited:
Multiculturalism has been in the USA or North America since the minute the Pilgrims set foot on terra firma.
In those terms, it’s been here since long before European discovery. Preexisting, warring indigenous tribes in N American were an array of cultures.
But that’s not what multiculturalism is about.
Multiculturalism is a 20th Century Marxist contrivance aimed at dividing and dissolving American culture through dissuasion of assimilation.
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?

Because everyone is seeing the truth about “multiculturalism”. It’s really about eradicating white Christian culture and replacing it with non-whites and non-Christians.

Once you come to realize this truth, every decision the left makes and every position they take on social and economic issues makes perfect sense.


BINGO! :thup::thup::thup:


you are absolutely right!

yes yes and yes!
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?

Because everyone is seeing the truth about “multiculturalism”. It’s really about eradicating white Christian culture and replacing it with non-whites and non-Christians.

Once you come to realize this truth, every decision the left makes and every position they take on social and economic issues makes perfect sense.

Ah, trying to keep everything the same, everything comfortable. The world is a place where everything changes. Animals die out, new ones are found. The dinosaurs died out.

Culture has always changed. Skin tone has always changed. White people were probably not white back in the past, their skin CHANGED due to the climate.

So, push man made climate change and then complain about darker skin.

Does it matter if a person is born white or yellow or red or black? They live and they die.

Apparently it matters to the left, they hate white people more than anything.

Do they? Or is this just a convenient thing for you to say to make out that you're right and everyone is wrong because actually dealing in the truth would be too difficult?
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?
There is no such animal called liberal multiculturalism.
I know it's called liberal dumbasses.
 
First off, it's not "liberal", it's leftist.

And it's because they're retards.
We may know that; but until actual Liberals take back their namesake, and openly, loudly differentiate themselves; the world will continue to conflate the two. Classical Liberals are nearly extinct.

I can only speak for myself but I've been "taking that back" the whole time I've been here and specifically correcting non-Liberals when they conflate "Liberal" with "leftist" or "Democrat" or even, bizarrely, "Progressives". But all I can do is lead the horse to the water. I don't know a way to actually force said conflators into using terms correctly -- a cursory scan revealing several such conflators right on this page.

Ultimately no one can possibly be responsible for a label that some retard who doesn't understand his own terms, gets hung on his back out of his own ignorance.
 
First off, it's not "liberal", it's leftist.

And it's because they're retards.
We may know that; but until actual Liberals take back their namesake, and openly, loudly differentiate themselves; the world will continue to conflate the two. Classical Liberals are nearly extinct.

I can only speak for myself but I've been "taking that back" the whole time I've been here and specifically correcting non-Liberals when they conflate "Liberal" with "leftist" or "Democrat" or even, bizarrely, "Progressives". But all I can do is lead the horse to the water. I don't know a way to actually force said conflators into using terms correctly -- a cursory scan revealing several such conflators right on this page.

Ultimately no one can possibly be responsible for a label that some retard who doesn't understand his own terms, gets hung on his back out of his own ignorance.

It irks me when people conflate leftists with liberals.

Even worse, when leftist Authoritarians take on the "liberal" moniker.
 
I can only speak for myself but I've been "taking that back" the whole time I've been here and specifically correcting non-Liberals when they conflate "Liberal" with "leftist" or "Democrat" or even, bizarrely, "Progressives". But all I can do is lead the horse to the water. I don't know a way to actually force said conflators into using terms correctly -- a cursory scan revealing several such conflators right on this page.
Let's just cal them assholes.
 
Multiculturalism has been in the USA or North America since the minute the Pilgrims set foot on terra firma.

Hell, "multiculturalism" can easily be followed on a line back to at least Marco Polo, and that's seven hundred years right there. It's got nothing to do with "Liberalism" or any other flavor of government, so I'm flummoxed as to what the hell this thread is supposed to be about.
 
First off, it's not "liberal", it's leftist.

And it's because they're retards.
We may know that; but until actual Liberals take back their namesake, and openly, loudly differentiate themselves; the world will continue to conflate the two. Classical Liberals are nearly extinct.

I can only speak for myself but I've been "taking that back" the whole time I've been here and specifically correcting non-Liberals when they conflate "Liberal" with "leftist" or "Democrat" or even, bizarrely, "Progressives". But all I can do is lead the horse to the water. I don't know a way to actually force said conflators into using terms correctly -- a cursory scan revealing several such conflators right on this page.

Ultimately no one can possibly be responsible for a label that some retard who doesn't understand his own terms, gets hung on his back out of his own ignorance.

It irks me when people conflate leftists with liberals.

Even worse, when leftist Authoritarians take on the "liberal" moniker.

I agree. I like to capsulize it thusly: To declare "all men are created equal" is the essence of Liberalism; to then declare "therefore we need affirmative action laws to ensure they get there" is leftism. The first is natural, the second, synthetic. The former is a passive statement of ideology, the latter is an activism contrived to crystallize the ideal.
 
First off, it's not "liberal", it's leftist.

And it's because they're retards.
We may know that; but until actual Liberals take back their namesake, and openly, loudly differentiate themselves; the world will continue to conflate the two. Classical Liberals are nearly extinct.

I can only speak for myself but I've been "taking that back" the whole time I've been here and specifically correcting non-Liberals when they conflate "Liberal" with "leftist" or "Democrat" or even, bizarrely, "Progressives". But all I can do is lead the horse to the water. I don't know a way to actually force said conflators into using terms correctly -- a cursory scan revealing several such conflators right on this page.

Ultimately no one can possibly be responsible for a label that some retard who doesn't understand his own terms, gets hung on his back out of his own ignorance.

It irks me when people conflate leftists with liberals.

Even worse, when leftist Authoritarians take on the "liberal" moniker.
Democrats and the left are synonymous and democrats stopped being liberal about 46 years ago when they were hijacked by Marxism.
 
Because the western world had enough of sewage.

Does that make sense? :04:
I think it’s more nuanced than that. For a greater part I think Liberals are to blame. No... Not Leftists. Liberals. Actual Liberals.
Their passive live, and let live ideology has opened their ranks up to the most militant and extreme examples of Leftist ideology; who have pretty much taken over the moniker of “liberal”; and once they were the loudest voices in the room so to speak they started replacing true liberal values with Marxist-Socialist agendas. To the point where in today’s common vernacular Liberal means leftist. And leftist is synonymous with socialist. And the Socialist mentality of “by any means necessary” including the displacement or replacement of native populations; has worn out the welcome amongst many people. People whom, while proud of their heritage, and once tolerant of a splash of foreign flavor; feel they are being choked out and having their birthright stolen in the name of an ideology that supports everyone but them.

If you research the new world order you will see where the root of all of this is at. Why it started etc. but nobody wants to go back in time because the leftist douches tell you it's a conspiracy . But yet the live map of it all is right in front of people.

Taking over the west has been the plan, a plan , a plan PEOPLE DO NOT PAY ATTENTION . The leftist liberals esp.
Thats' why we have infowars================ because this is an information war most aren't comprehending that fact.
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?
The answer is that it's not. We are seeing the effects of wars and corruption driving people towards the free and opportunistic countries. There will be growing pains and there will be attempts by the xenophobic to stop it, but the mixing of people is inescapable. It's part of nature. You can see it in other species and in humans going back 10s of thousands of years. What we see in America is the right frantically trying to cling to the status quo as usual, to prevent inevitable change. They will have some successes but when the kids mingle they learn that the racism and xenophobia are baseless and immoral. Skin color, place of birth, even religion don't define a person's goodness or potential.
 
Because the western world had enough of sewage.

Does that make sense? :04:
I think it’s more nuanced than that. For a greater part I think Liberals are to blame. No... Not Leftists. Liberals. Actual Liberals.
Their passive live, and let live ideology has opened their ranks up to the most militant and extreme examples of Leftist ideology; who have pretty much taken over the moniker of “liberal”; and once they were the loudest voices in the room so to speak they started replacing true liberal values with Marxist-Socialist agendas. To the point where in today’s common vernacular Liberal means leftist. And leftist is synonymous with socialist. And the Socialist mentality of “by any means necessary” including the displacement or replacement of native populations; has worn out the welcome amongst many people. People whom, while proud of their heritage, and once tolerant of a splash of foreign flavor; feel they are being choked out and having their birthright stolen in the name of an ideology that supports everyone but them.


Liberals? look I would call the scum communists.


Do not be PC when you refer to these losers, ok?
I'm center left and support a mostly free market. The other educated ones I know do as well. You're a fail hard blow hard fraud. Stop tattooing hannitys, limbaugh's, and trump's foul thoughts on your brain.
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?
The answer is that it's not. We are seeing the effects of wars and corruption driving people towards the free and opportunistic countries. There will be growing pains and there will be attempts by the xenophobic to stop it, but the mixing of people is inescapable. It's part of nature. You can see it in other species and in humans going back 10s of thousands of years. What we see in America is the right frantically trying to cling to the status quo as usual, to prevent inevitable change. They will have some successes but when the kids mingle they learn that the racism and xenophobia are baseless and immoral. Skin color, place of birth, even religion don't define a person's goodness or potential.
Bullshit. People aren’t mixing. They’re segregating and it’s getting a push from leftist ideology.
 

Forum List

Back
Top