Why Is Liberal Ideology Increasingly Being Rejected By The West?

Vastator

Platinum Member
Oct 14, 2014
21,966
9,490
950
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?
 
Because the western world had enough of sewage.

Does that make sense? :04:
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?

Globalist multiculturalism (as in maintaining separate cultures within a nation) is neither advantageous to nor compatible with Western political philosophies or values.
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?
Nationalism has never died..nor even diminished. As resources diminish...instability is settling in--should be a great bloodbath...if history is any guide. Multiculturalism was always overstated anyway..for people's agendas. On both sides.
 
Liberalism used to mean something before the statists on the so-called left and the statists on the so-called right arbitrarily hijacked the term in order to create the illusion of some kind of separation between themselves.

Americans are pretty much all just a bunch of statists if you ask me. Most of em anyway.
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?
There is no such animal called liberal multiculturalism.
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?

Globalist multiculturalism (as in maintaining separate cultures within a nation) is neither advantageous to nor compatible with Western political philosophies or values.
The Nazis proved that.
 
Because the western world had enough of sewage.

Does that make sense? :04:
I think it’s more nuanced than that. For a greater part I think Liberals are to blame. No... Not Leftists. Liberals. Actual Liberals.
Their passive live, and let live ideology has opened their ranks up to the most militant and extreme examples of Leftist ideology; who have pretty much taken over the moniker of “liberal”; and once they were the loudest voices in the room so to speak they started replacing true liberal values with Marxist-Socialist agendas. To the point where in today’s common vernacular Liberal means leftist. And leftist is synonymous with socialist. And the Socialist mentality of “by any means necessary” including the displacement or replacement of native populations; has worn out the welcome amongst many people. People whom, while proud of their heritage, and once tolerant of a splash of foreign flavor; feel they are being choked out and having their birthright stolen in the name of an ideology that supports everyone but them.
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?
Because the more freedoms people win, the more that oppressors turn to fascism to fight back.
 
Because the western world had enough of sewage.

Does that make sense? :04:
I think it’s more nuanced than that. For a greater part I think Liberals are to blame. No... Not Leftists. Liberals. Actual Liberals.
Their passive live, and let live ideology has opened their ranks up to the most militant and extreme examples of Leftist ideology; who have pretty much taken over the moniker of “liberal”; and once they were the loudest voices in the room so to speak they started replacing true liberal values with Marxist-Socialist agendas. To the point where in today’s common vernacular Liberal means leftist. And leftist is synonymous with socialist. And the Socialist mentality of “by any means necessary” including the displacement or replacement of native populations; has worn out the welcome amongst many people. People whom, while proud of their heritage, and once tolerant of a splash of foreign flavor; feel they are being choked out and having their birthright stolen in the name of an ideology that supports everyone but them.


Liberals? look I would call the scum communists.


Do not be PC when you refer to these losers, ok?
 
Yeah and get ready for the gulags coming yer way in November...It's better when it's bitter cold to Trotsky yer ass out in the snow naked for political re-education.
 
Because the western world had enough of sewage.

Does that make sense? :04:
I think it’s more nuanced than that. For a greater part I think Liberals are to blame. No... Not Leftists. Liberals. Actual Liberals.
Their passive live, and let live ideology has opened their ranks up to the most militant and extreme examples of Leftist ideology; who have pretty much taken over the moniker of “liberal”; and once they were the loudest voices in the room so to speak they started replacing true liberal values with Marxist-Socialist agendas. To the point where in today’s common vernacular Liberal means leftist. And leftist is synonymous with socialist. And the Socialist mentality of “by any means necessary” including the displacement or replacement of native populations; has worn out the welcome amongst many people. People whom, while proud of their heritage, and once tolerant of a splash of foreign flavor; feel they are being choked out and having their birthright stolen in the name of an ideology that supports everyone but them.


Liberals? look I would call the scum communists.


Do not be PC when you refer to these losers, ok?
That’s quite the point. What commonly passes for a “Liberal” these days; isn’t actually a liberal at all.
 
Maybe you could do yerself a flava flave and specifically identify these liberals by name so we can see just what in the hell you be splainin.
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?

Globalist multiculturalism (as in maintaining separate cultures within a nation) is neither advantageous to nor compatible with Western political philosophies or values.
The Nazis proved that.

Nope. The Reich sought to destroy the "outsiders". The West wants them to assimilate.

St. Patty's Day is a celebration of foreign heritage, not the law of the land. No push to speak Gaelic here.
 
[QUOTE="EvilEyeFleegle, post: 20206764, member: 67367"
Nationalism has never died..nor even diminished. As resources diminish...instability is settling in--should be a great bloodbath...if history is any guide. Multiculturalism was always overstated anyway..for people's agendas. On both sides.[/QUOTE]
There are advantages to multiculturalism, but not to the point of undefining your own core culture and people.

It is much worse in Europe where the nationalism is ethnic based, but here in the USA we have a civic nationalism that is not tied to an ethnicity.

All the same, English language and culture has been a common factor keeping us together despite the stupidity of Anglo culture.

We are likely to transition into some kind of hybrid Anglo-catholic culture in the near future.

But we should not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Having multiple cultural heritages in our nation has brought us multiple perspectives on various issues and has brought us a keen creative advantage over our competitor nations.
 
How has the seemingly unstoppable juggernaut of liberal multiculturalism,come to such an abrupt halt?
With the election of nationalist leaders across the West; and the rise of populist parties across Europe; from the USA, to Austria, throughout Italy, and into Hungary...
What has happened to alter what seemed to be a foregone conclusion for many, that nationalism was dead; and that multiculturalism was the future?
It hasn't stopped.

Germany has told countries that their elections don't count b/c they failed to elect the right people.

leftist insanity is in full swing. Not even massive increases in rape has caused them to slow down.
 
Because the western world had enough of sewage.

Does that make sense? :04:
I think it’s more nuanced than that. For a greater part I think Liberals are to blame. No... Not Leftists. Liberals. Actual Liberals.
Their passive live, and let live ideology has opened their ranks up to the most militant and extreme examples of Leftist ideology; who have pretty much taken over the moniker of “liberal”; and once they were the loudest voices in the room so to speak they started replacing true liberal values with Marxist-Socialist agendas. To the point where in today’s common vernacular Liberal means leftist. And leftist is synonymous with socialist. And the Socialist mentality of “by any means necessary” including the displacement or replacement of native populations; has worn out the welcome amongst many people. People whom, while proud of their heritage, and once tolerant of a splash of foreign flavor; feel they are being choked out and having their birthright stolen in the name of an ideology that supports everyone but them.


Liberals? look I would call the scum communists.


Do not be PC when you refer to these losers, ok?
That’s quite the point. What commonly passes for a “Liberal” these days; isn’t actually a liberal at all.

Sure :thup:

it's called scum

say it out loud!

SAY IT
 
Maybe you could do yerself a flava flave and specifically identify these liberals by name so we can see just what in the hell you be splainin.
Here’s a pic of a few. Kinda old timey; but they were certainly the liberals of their day. A stark contrast to what the Liberals(Socialists) of today stand for. But I think it serves to illustrate the point...
A8B32AF7-CEDE-407C-8E18-0876308E1512.jpeg
 

Forum List

Back
Top