Why is it OK to call POTUS a Racist, but NOT OK to call Paddock a LIBERAL?

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Liberalism does not advocate mass murder.

BULLSHIT.

Communists have killed over 90 million people.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Other than his passion for guns...what makes him liberal?

Palpable hatred...

 

[S.J.]

Other than his passion for guns...what makes him liberal?

His passion for killing Americans.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Paddock like Hodgkinson was a registered democrat

yes indeed he was

 

[LoneLaugher]

I see our nutbags are working themselves up into a lather again.

 

[deanrd]

Strange days indeed, when the Left can offer up all of their Conspiracy Theories AD NAUSEUM about why they think The President is a Racist with NO Proof, and even testimony to the contrary, but you cannot discuss, the fact or EVEN THE POSSIBILITY that Paddock the Vegas Shooter was a Liberal.

There is far more evidence to suggest that calling Paddock a Liberal in the Same category with The Congressional Baseball Shooter (Hodgkinson) is a legitimate claim worthy to be discussed in The Politics Forum than there is evidence enough to discuss The President being a Racist.

So why is one discussion welcome and encouraged and the other called a Conspiracy Theory?

My other question is:

Why is it OK for THE LEFT to Politicize this Shooting of Deplorables and Country Music Fans for the purposes of forwarding a gun control agenda, but it is NOT OK to discuss an emerging pattern of violence that we are seeing on The Left with Groups like ANTIFA, BLM, Violence paid for by the DNC at Trump Rallies (Democracy Advocates) & even Hollywood actors and Actresses trying to mainstream calls for Violence against The President and Conservatives?

Undercover video shows Democrats saying they hire agitators to disrupt Donald Trump events

A wealthy white guy who loves guns and murder.

Doesn't sound very liberal.

But it does sound very conservative.

 

[gallantwarrior]

Anyone with that many gun has got to vote Republican which makes him a nutcase.

Last I knew, no one had banned Dems/libs/progs from purchasing firearms in this country. Maybe we should start, liberalism is a mental disease, after all.

 

[The Original Tree]

Strange days indeed, when the Left can offer up all of their Conspiracy Theories AD NAUSEUM about why they think The President is a Racist with NO Proof, and even testimony to the contrary, but you cannot discuss, the fact or EVEN THE POSSIBILITY that Paddock the Vegas Shooter was a Liberal.

There is far more evidence to suggest that calling Paddock a Liberal in the Same category with The Congressional Baseball Shooter (Hodgkinson) is a legitimate claim worthy to be discussed in The Politics Forum than there is evidence enough to discuss The President being a Racist.

So why is one discussion welcome and encouraged and the other called a Conspiracy Theory?

My other question is:

Why is it OK for THE LEFT to Politicize this Shooting of Deplorables and Country Music Fans for the purposes of forwarding a gun control agenda, but it is NOT OK to discuss an emerging pattern of violence that we are seeing on The Left with Groups like ANTIFA, BLM, Violence paid for by the DNC at Trump Rallies (Democracy Advocates) & even Hollywood actors and Actresses trying to mainstream calls for Violence against The President and Conservatives?

Undercover video shows Democrats saying they hire agitators to disrupt Donald Trump events

A wealthy white guy who loves guns and murder.

Doesn't sound very liberal.

But it does sound very conservative.

Obama Bin Laden was wealthy, so is George Soros.

Your point is?

You don't have a point.

All you have is a poor attempt at deflection and a failed attempt at avoiding the actual topic.

 

[gallantwarrior]

The fact that they're hiding the information they've gathered on Paddock tells us he's a liberal. If there was even a hint of him being anything else the media would be shouting it from the rooftops.

No probably a conservative, we know one think he was white same as the guy who shot Scalise, Dylan Roof, Tim McVeigh, and many more. McVeigh a vet even and Nickols got so upset over pedophile Koresh (a white Christian freak) they did the Oklahoma city bombing. Conservatives they sound like, even the Ruby Ridge guy and his wife, Christian zealots.

OK, that didn't even make sense. Use some verbs, that might help. Otherwise, you might want to quit posting after the third beer.

 

[Windparadox]

I see our nutbags are working themselves up into a lather again.

`
I thought this was a nutbag thread?

 

[Care4all]

Strange days indeed, when the Left can offer up all of their Conspiracy Theories AD NAUSEUM about why they think The President is a Racist with NO Proof, and even testimony to the contrary, but you cannot discuss, the fact or EVEN THE POSSIBILITY that Paddock the Vegas Shooter was a Liberal.

There is far more evidence to suggest that calling Paddock a Liberal in the Same category with The Congressional Baseball Shooter (Hodgkinson) is a legitimate claim worthy to be discussed in The Politics Forum than there is evidence enough to discuss The President being a Racist.

So why is one discussion welcome and encouraged and the other called a Conspiracy Theory?

My other question is:

Why is it OK for THE LEFT to Politicize this Shooting of Deplorables and Country Music Fans for the purposes of forwarding a gun control agenda, but it is NOT OK to discuss an emerging pattern of violence that we are seeing on The Left with Groups like ANTIFA, BLM, Violence paid for by the DNC at Trump Rallies (Democracy Advocates) & even Hollywood actors and Actresses trying to mainstream calls for Violence against The President and Conservatives?

Undercover video shows Democrats saying they hire agitators to disrupt Donald Trump events

Tracking down the cause of violence at Trump rallies

Geez Louise....

fake news!
No one paid for violence....

 

[The Original Tree]

Strange days indeed, when the Left can offer up all of their Conspiracy Theories AD NAUSEUM about why they think The President is a Racist with NO Proof, and even testimony to the contrary, but you cannot discuss, the fact or EVEN THE POSSIBILITY that Paddock the Vegas Shooter was a Liberal.

There is far more evidence to suggest that calling Paddock a Liberal in the Same category with The Congressional Baseball Shooter (Hodgkinson) is a legitimate claim worthy to be discussed in The Politics Forum than there is evidence enough to discuss The President being a Racist.

So why is one discussion welcome and encouraged and the other called a Conspiracy Theory?

My other question is:

Why is it OK for THE LEFT to Politicize this Shooting of Deplorables and Country Music Fans for the purposes of forwarding a gun control agenda, but it is NOT OK to discuss an emerging pattern of violence that we are seeing on The Left with Groups like ANTIFA, BLM, Violence paid for by the DNC at Trump Rallies (Democracy Advocates) & even Hollywood actors and Actresses trying to mainstream calls for Violence against The President and Conservatives?

Undercover video shows Democrats saying they hire agitators to disrupt Donald Trump events

Tracking down the cause of violence at Trump rallies

Geez Louise....

fake news!
No one paid for violence....

It was only a matter of time before the Professional Liars and Leftist Trolls showed up here to disrupt the thread and refuse to discuss the actual topic of discussion.

'Smoking Gun' Email Confirms DNC Involvement In Inciting Violence At Trump Rallies

Video: Democratic Activists Admit to Inciting Violence at Trump Events

Undercover Video Catches Clinton Operatives Admit to "Starting Sh*t" Inciting "Anarchy" at Trump Rallies

Bombshell Video: Clinton Campaign, DNC Pay to Incite Violence at Trump Rallies | The Stream

ISIS claims Las Vegas shooting, says Stephen Paddock "converted" to Islam

Video has Democratic operative fired, another resigns - CNN Video

"Don’t Repeat That To Anybody" - Hillary Clinton And Donna Brazile Personally Implicated In Latest Project Veritas Video

'Draw them to punch you': 2 Dem operatives lose jobs after undercover video comments

 

[bodecea]

Strange days indeed, when the Left can offer up all of their Conspiracy Theories AD NAUSEUM about why they think The President is a Racist with NO Proof, and even testimony to the contrary, but you cannot discuss, the fact or EVEN THE POSSIBILITY that Paddock the Vegas Shooter was a Liberal.

There is far more evidence to suggest that calling Paddock a Liberal in the Same category with The Congressional Baseball Shooter (Hodgkinson) is a legitimate claim worthy to be discussed in The Politics Forum than there is evidence enough to discuss The President being a Racist.

So why is one discussion welcome and encouraged and the other called a Conspiracy Theory?

My other question is:

Why is it OK for THE LEFT to Politicize this Shooting of Deplorables and Country Music Fans for the purposes of forwarding a gun control agenda, but it is NOT OK to discuss an emerging pattern of violence that we are seeing on The Left with Groups like ANTIFA, BLM, Violence paid for by the DNC at Trump Rallies (Democracy Advocates) & even Hollywood actors and Actresses trying to mainstream calls for Violence against The President and Conservatives?

Undercover video shows Democrats saying they hire agitators to disrupt Donald Trump events

What is it about Paddock that leads you to believe he was a liberal? You realize that most of those at the concert were from California, right? You could make just a good a case that he was some trumpanzee shooting Left-Coast Californians.

 

[bodecea]

Anyone with that many gun has got to vote Republican which makes him a nutcase.

so no liberal has a big collection of guns?...

Well, the OP wants to assert that no liberal is a fan of Country Music.

 

[bodecea]

The fact that they're hiding the information they've gathered on Paddock tells us he's a liberal. If there was even a hint of him being anything else the media would be shouting it from the rooftops.

I've said this repeatedly. "It's a MYSTERY" to The Left and Main Stream Media why Paddock did this, but the signs are clearly there. They pulled the same stunt initially with Hodgkinson, until it was blatantly obvious he was a VIOLENT Leftist Extremist. Then as usual they tried to push "THAT STORY" to the back pages, and return to bashing Trump and pounding the pulpit like Kruschev FOR GUN CONTROL.

Instead of confronting the issues, they want to shift the narrative to gun control instead of discussing the rise of violent elements within The Democrat Party, and how The Left should renounce calls for violence against people they disagree with politically, and how it would be better for America and their party if they purged such people from their ranks.

We know you WANT this guy to be a liberal. Why? I thought guns were cool. What's wrong with taking ownership of this wealthy, gun-collecting guy?

 

[deanrd]

Strange days indeed, when the Left can offer up all of their Conspiracy Theories AD NAUSEUM about why they think The President is a Racist with NO Proof, and even testimony to the contrary, but you cannot discuss, the fact or EVEN THE POSSIBILITY that Paddock the Vegas Shooter was a Liberal.

There is far more evidence to suggest that calling Paddock a Liberal in the Same category with The Congressional Baseball Shooter (Hodgkinson) is a legitimate claim worthy to be discussed in The Politics Forum than there is evidence enough to discuss The President being a Racist.

So why is one discussion welcome and encouraged and the other called a Conspiracy Theory?

My other question is:

Why is it OK for THE LEFT to Politicize this Shooting of Deplorables and Country Music Fans for the purposes of forwarding a gun control agenda, but it is NOT OK to discuss an emerging pattern of violence that we are seeing on The Left with Groups like ANTIFA, BLM, Violence paid for by the DNC at Trump Rallies (Democracy Advocates) & even Hollywood actors and Actresses trying to mainstream calls for Violence against The President and Conservatives?

Undercover video shows Democrats saying they hire agitators to disrupt Donald Trump events

Tracking down the cause of violence at Trump rallies

Geez Louise....

fake news!
No one paid for violence....

It was only a matter of time before the Professional Liars and Leftist Trolls showed up here to disrupt the thread and refuse to discuss the actual topic of discussion.

'Smoking Gun' Email Confirms DNC Involvement In Inciting Violence At Trump Rallies

Video: Democratic Activists Admit to Inciting Violence at Trump Events

Undercover Video Catches Clinton Operatives Admit to "Starting Sh*t" Inciting "Anarchy" at Trump Rallies

Bombshell Video: Clinton Campaign, DNC Pay to Incite Violence at Trump Rallies | The Stream

ISIS claims Las Vegas shooting, says Stephen Paddock "converted" to Islam

Video has Democratic operative fired, another resigns - CNN Video

"Don’t Repeat That To Anybody" - Hillary Clinton And Donna Brazile Personally Implicated In Latest Project Veritas Video

'Draw them to punch you': 2 Dem operatives lose jobs after undercover video comments

Some Mexicans don't rape.
They are sending us their rapists and drug dealers.
A Mexican can't be a good judge.

Sounds like a Republican talking. In fact, take out the word Mexican and replace it with black or Muslim or gay or what ever and there you have the GOP.

 

[bodecea]

Paddock like Hodgkinson was a registered democrat

Link to Paddock's party registration, please.

 

[BlindBoo]

It's okay, you can call Paddock a liberal.

He's still a crazy motherfucker with a gun who killed a bunch of people.

I can still call Captain Blurt a racist..........opps I mean President Blurt.

He's still a crazy motherfucker with nukes........

 

[NYcarbineer]

What the OP is really asking is,

why is it okay to be right, but not okay to be wrong?

 

[WEATHER53]

You question implies the existence of two way streets but in lib land it's a one way street so calling him a liberal first hurts their feelings and second has to be racist in some odd and convoluted way