Why I am voting for Obama again

[Stephanie]

keep cuttin' and pastin' stuff from right wing blog sites... it's what you've always done.

really? your 13th post and you have us all figured out eh?
just be a good little tool for the Progressive party

I've seen you operate on other sites, sweetie.

doubt it..haven't been to any other in years..but you keep on being a good little useful tool, dearie

 

[Dot Com]

funny stuff.

Obama's grandfather was a communist who just so happened to work for the furniture store selling furniture.... HOW RADICAL! Obama's grandmother was a communist who worked for the bank.


and John Conyers, a supposed member of this evil and nefarious organization called the DSA is chairman of the judiciary committee. I wonder how Boehner let that slip by?

just keep your head buried in the sand and continue being the good sheep to the party..and chant, all hale the Democrat party

keep cuttin' and pastin' stuff from right wing blog sites... it's what you've always done.

I see you're familiar w/ Steph's tactics

 

[Dot Com]

So according to you TM the Pledge of Allegiance should be rewritten to include the word Democracy?

I pledge allegiance to the Flag
of the United States of America,
and to the Republic , a form of Democracy, for which it stands:
one Nation under God, indivisible,
With Liberty and Justice for all.

originally written by a socialist... and the "under God" part wasn't added until the 50's. So there certainly is precedent for editing it.

pos-repped

 

[peach174]

So according to you TM the Pledge of Allegiance should be rewritten to include the word Democracy?

I pledge allegiance to the Flag
of the United States of America,
and to the Republic , a form of Democracy, for which it stands:
one Nation under God, indivisible,
With Liberty and Justice for all.

originally written by a socialist... and the "under God" part wasn't added until the 50's. So there certainly is precedent for editing it.

Our Constitution guarantees us a Republic form of Government not a Democracy Republic.
If the founders wanted a Democracy Republic they would have written it into the constitution.
We are not suppose to be an Entitlement Socialist Government nor a Communist Government where business is owned by the Feds. The Treasury still owns 500 million shares -- a 32% stake in the world's largest automaker.

 

[expatriate]

really? your 13th post and you have us all figured out eh?
just be a good little tool for the Progressive party

I've seen you operate on other sites, sweetie.

doubt it..haven't been to any other in years..but you keep on being a good little useful tool, dearie

doubt it all you like, steph... we go way back, darlin'.

 

[Stephanie]

I've seen you operate on other sites, sweetie.

doubt it..haven't been to any other in years..but you keep on being a good little useful tool, dearie

doubt it all you like, steph... we go way back, darlin'.

no matter what you think or who you go way back with, you would probably the reason I left...lol
I could care less

 

[JakeStarkey]

If Smith and Conyer are communists, then Boehner and Ryan are fascists.

Words have definite meanings. YOU don't get to change the meanings.

funny stuff.

Obama's grandfather was a communist who just so happened to work for the furniture store selling furniture.... HOW RADICAL! Obama's grandmother was a communist who worked for the bank.


and John Conyers, a supposed member of this evil and nefarious organization called the DSA is chairman of the judiciary committee. I wonder how Boehner let that slip by?

Lamar Smith is the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and John Conyers is the ranking member. Boehner does not select who the Democrats appoint to these committees.

Are all Communists harmless, or just the some of them?

 

[JakeStarkey]

stephanie being outed again as a tool of the far extremist non-mainstream right?

 

[Stephanie]

stephanie being outed again as a tool of the far extremist non-mainstream right?

oh jakie, you were outed a long time ago for being a fake "responsible" Republican

 

[expatriate]

doubt it..haven't been to any other in years..but you keep on being a good little useful tool, dearie

doubt it all you like, steph... we go way back, darlin'.

no matter what you think or who you go way back with, you would probably the reason I left...lol
I could care less

neither here nor there... the fact of the matter is: I have seen you operate for a long time and you M.O. is cutting and pasting stuff from hard right wing blogs and trying to pawn it off as fact. The one you cut and pasted in THIS thread is so old you still have John Conyers as chair of the judiciary.... but you don't care. You'll just cut and paste more stupid stuff tuesday... and if not this tuesday, then next tuesday, and I'll keep laughing at it.

 

[Sinjorri]

doubt it all you like, steph... we go way back, darlin'.

no matter what you think or who you go way back with, you would probably the reason I left...lol
I could care less

neither here nor there... the fact of the matter is: I have seen you operate for a long time and you M.O. is cutting and pasting stuff from hard right wing blogs and trying to pawn it off as fact. The one you cut and pasted in THIS thread is so old you still have John Conyers as chair of the judiciary.... but you don't care. You'll just cut and paste more stupid stuff tuesday... and if not this tuesday, then next tuesday, and I'll keep laughing at it.

pretty much the same we do with the left, or if they run out links and just make stuff like like msnbc, cbs and nbc.

 

[Stephanie]

doubt it all you like, steph... we go way back, darlin'.

no matter what you think or who you go way back with, you would probably the reason I left...lol
I could care less

neither here nor there... the fact of the matter is: I have seen you operate for a long time and you M.O. is cutting and pasting stuff from hard right wing blogs and trying to pawn it off as fact. The one you cut and pasted in THIS thread is so old you still have John Conyers as chair of the judiciary.... but you don't care. You'll just cut and paste more stupid stuff tuesday... and if not this tuesday, then next tuesday, and I'll keep laughing at it.

oh goody, you've supposedly seen me operate, what they kick you off this other board so you decide to bless us here..lol
am I suppose to care now or later

 

[Navy1960]

It looks like I still remain one of those undecided voters , Mitt Romney appears to represent failed economic policies that were tried and failed under the Bush Administration which led to where we are now. I did not vote for President Obama the first time around , for the simple reason is that his party while tending to the needs to the American people which is a noble thing to do, keeping this nations financial house in order is also noble and has been put on sidelines. Mitt Romney's economic and foreign policy is nothing but a revisit of the Bush Administration in which we as a nation made the choice to cut taxes several times while at war as well as reduce regulations to point where the economy eventually could not sustain it. I do not see much daylight betweeen these two men in terms of how much will get done while they are in office, so I tend to remain undecided and hopeful that perhaps one day someone will step forward and provide real leadership our nation has been lacking for a very long time now.

 

[Freewill]

It looks like I still remain one of those undecided voters , Mitt Romney appears to represent failed economic policies that were tried and failed under the Bush Administration which led to where we are now. I did not vote for President Obama the first time around , for the simple reason is that his party while tending to the needs to the American people which is a noble thing to do, keeping this nations financial house in order is also noble and has been put on sidelines. Mitt Romney's economic and foreign policy is nothing but a revisit of the Bush Administration in which we as a nation made the choice to cut taxes several times while at war as well as reduce regulations to point where the economy eventually could not sustain it. I do not see much daylight betweeen these two men in terms of how much will get done while they are in office, so I tend to remain undecided and hopeful that perhaps one day someone will step forward and provide real leadership our nation has been lacking for a very long time now.

How can you say that with the state of the economy that the democrats take care of the needs of the people? The needs of the people should NOT be dependency on the government. Because of the democrats, who have controlled things for 5 1/2 years the needs of the people have risen to historic proportions. To me that stinks of failure. I am going to use an analogy that is consistant with the DNC history. Taking care of the needs of the people is like saying that the slave owner took care of his slaves that were in chains by feeding them.

Romney reformed Mass. and did pretty well at it. What you need to think is, does Obama deserve to be rewarded for the job he has done regardless of whom he is running against. In this case the man he is running against has a proven history of success so the choice should be easy.

 

[peach174]

Why is your party LYING about the definitions of words so you can trash the label democracy?

teh constitution backs us up. go read it some day.

No it doesn't you fucking brainwashed idiot.


go read the definitions of the words.

we ARE a Democracy

Yes TM, our Constitution in Article 4 - Section four says so.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.
It does not say a Democracy Republican form of Government.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You idiots want deregulation and tax cuts for the wealthy.

that is what caused this mess

Which deregulation caused this mess? Be specific.
How did tax cuts for the rich cause this mess? Be specific.

 

[Truthmatters]

The SEC withholding of the broker rules in GLB

 

[Truthmatters]

SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers
Eight Years After Passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Key Provisions Will Now Be Implemented
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2007-190
Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2007 - Ending eight years of stalled negotiations and impasse, the Commission today voted to adopt, jointly with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), new rules that will finally implement the bank broker provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Board will consider these final rules at its Sept. 24, 2007 meeting. The Commission and the Board consulted with and sought the concurrence of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Thrift Supervision.

 

[Truthmatters]

You idiots want deregulation and tax cuts for the wealthy.

that is what caused this mess

Which deregulation caused this mess? Be specific.
How did tax cuts for the rich cause this mess? Be specific.

The tax cuts for the wealthy in the Bush years decreased our revenue anlong with two wars that were kept off budget.


why do you idiots keep pretending you have not been told all this before?

 

[expatriate]

no matter what you think or who you go way back with, you would probably the reason I left...lol
I could care less

neither here nor there... the fact of the matter is: I have seen you operate for a long time and you M.O. is cutting and pasting stuff from hard right wing blogs and trying to pawn it off as fact. The one you cut and pasted in THIS thread is so old you still have John Conyers as chair of the judiciary.... but you don't care. You'll just cut and paste more stupid stuff tuesday... and if not this tuesday, then next tuesday, and I'll keep laughing at it.

oh goody, you've supposedly seen me operate, what they kick you off this other board so you decide to bless us here..lol
am I suppose to care now or later

care? of course not. I merely state that, through past experience, I DO know your style and I DO know your M.O. and it remains a source of great humor for me. I'll be sure to follow your antics as time goes by and point out the errors in them every once in a while.